RESUMEN
Cardiac allografts suffer diastolic dysfunction early post-heart transplantation (HTx) due to ischemic injury, however the natural course of diastology recovery post HTx remains unknown (Tallaj et al., 2007 [1]). We retrospectively reviewed 60 adult HTx patients between 2015 and 2021 at a single site. Invasive hemodynamics and echocardiograms were obtained at 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-HTx. RA strain by 2D feature tracking was compared to intracardiac pressure measurements. In all patients, we observed normalization of RV and RA filling pressures by post-operative week 12 and recovery of diastolic dysfunction by month 6. There was an inverse correlation between RV end-diastolic pressure and RA contractile (r = -0.192, p < 0.05) and reservoir (r = -0.128, p < 0.05) functions in the allograft. As the post-transplant care paradigm shifts away from invasive procedures, right atrial indices should be included in imaging-based allograft surveillance studies.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It remains controversial whether adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins has a more beneficial impact on the treatment efficacy and safety of patients with existing atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) compared to high-intensity statin regimens. HYPOTHESIS: A combination of low/moderate-intensity statins plus ezetimibe might be more effective and safer than high-intensity statin monotherapy. METHODS: We searched databases for randomized controlled trials comparing lipid profile alterations, drug-related adverse events, and MACE components between high-intensity statin monotherapy and low/moderate-intensity statin plus ezetimibe combination therapy. Pooled risk ratios (RR), mean differences (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Our comprehensive search resulted in 32 studies comprising 6162 patients treated with monotherapy against 5880 patients on combination therapy. Combination therapy was more effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels compared to monotherapy (MD = -6.6, 95% CI: -10.6 to -2.5); however, no significant differences were observed in other lipid parameters. Furthermore, the combination therapy group experienced a lower risk of myalgia (RR = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.13-0.57) and discontinuation due to adverse events (RR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.51-0.74). The occurrence of MACE was similar between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ezetimibe to low/moderate-intensity statins resulted in a greater reduction in LDL-C levels, a lower rate of myalgia, and less drug discontinuation compared to high-intensity statin monotherapy in patients with existing cardiovascular disease. However, according to our meta-analysis, the observed reduction in LDL-C levels in the combination group did not correlate with a reduction in MACE compared to the high-intensity statin group.
Asunto(s)
Anticolesterolemiantes , LDL-Colesterol , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ezetimiba , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Humanos , Ezetimiba/uso terapéutico , Ezetimiba/administración & dosificación , Ezetimiba/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , LDL-Colesterol/sangre , Anticolesterolemiantes/uso terapéutico , Anticolesterolemiantes/administración & dosificación , Anticolesterolemiantes/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Aterosclerosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Aterosclerosis/sangre , Biomarcadores/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter represent the most prevalent clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias. While the CHA2DS2-VASc score is commonly used to inform anticoagulation therapy decisions for patients with these conditions, its predictive power is limited. Therefore, we sought to improve risk prediction for left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT), a known risk factor for stroke in these patients. METHODS: We developed and validated an explainable machine learning model using the eXtreme Gradient Boosting algorithm with 5 × 5 nested cross-validation. The primary outcome was to predict the probability of LAAT in patients with atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter who underwent transesophageal echocardiogram prior to cardioversion. Our algorithm used 37 demographic, comorbid, and transthoracic echocardiographic variables. RESULTS: A total of 795 patients were included in our analysis. LAAT was present in 11.3% of the patients. The average age of patients was 63.3 years and 34.7% were women. Patients with LAAT had significantly lower left ventricular ejection fraction (29.9% vs 43.5%; p < 0.001), lower E' lateral velocity (5.7 cm vs. 7.9 cm; p < 0.001) and higher E/A ratio (2.6 vs 1.8; p = 0.002). Our machine learning model achieved a high AUC of 0.79, with a high specificity of 0.82, and modest sensitivity of 0.57. Left ventricular ejection fraction was the most important variable in predicting LAAT. Patients were split into 10 buckets based on the percentile of their predicted probability of having thrombus. The lower the percentile (e.g., 10%), the lower the probability of having thrombus. Using a cutoff point of 0.16 which includes 10.0% of the patients, we can rule out thrombus with 100% confidence. CONCLUSION: Using machine learning, we refined the predictive power of predicting LAAT and explained the model. These results show promise in providing better guidance for anticoagulation therapy and cardioversion in AF and AFL patients.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Right ventricular (RV) systolic dysfunction has been identified as a prognostic marker for adverse clinical events in patients presenting with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). However, challenges exist in identifying RV dysfunction using conventional echocardiography techniques. Strain echocardiography is an evolving imaging modality which measures myocardial deformation and can be used as an objective index of RV systolic function. This study evaluated RV Global Longitudinal Strain (RVGLS) in patients with intermediate risk PE as a parameter of RV dysfunction, and compared to traditional echocardiographic and CT parameters evaluating short-term mortality. METHODS: Retrospective single center cohort study of 251 patients with intermediate-risk PE between 2010 and 2018. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days. Statistical analysis evaluated each parameter comparing survivors versus non-survivors at 30 days. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for comparison of the two cohorts. RESULTS: Altogether 251 patients were evaluated. Overall mortality rate was 12.4%. Utilizing an ROC curve, an absolute cutoff value of 17.7 for RVGLS demonstrated a sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 70% for observed 30-day mortality. Individuals with an RVGLS ≤17.7 had a 25 times higher mortality rate than those with RVGLS above 17.7 (HR 25.24, 95% CI = 6.0-106.4, p < .001). Area under the curve was (.855), RVGLS outperformed traditional echocardiographic parameters, CT findings, and cardiac biomarkers on univariable and multivariable analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced RVGLS values on initial echocardiographic assessment of patients with intermediate-risk PE identified patients at higher risk for mortality at 30 days.
Asunto(s)
Embolia Pulmonar , Disfunción Ventricular Derecha , Humanos , Tensión Longitudinal Global , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Cohortes , Volumen Sistólico , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Función Ventricular Derecha , PronósticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the multimorbidity burden of clinical trial participants and assess its association with treatment response. METHODS: We conducted a reanalysis of patient level data. There were 29,954 participants from 8 clinical trials containing 11 comparisons between an intervention and control condition. Patients were classified by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score. The primary outcomes were the primary study endpoints as originally specified for each trial. A Cox model that included the CCI score groups, the randomized group, and their interaction, was used to compare the primary outcome between randomized groups. The interaction term between randomized group and comorbidity index allowed the treatment effect to differ by level of comorbidity index and comprised the primary effect of interest. Hazard ratios and risk differences were reported for all comparisons. RESULTS: The mean CCI scores of trial populations ranged from 2.1 to 3.9 points, and the percentage of patients with scores ≥5 from 3% to 39%. Tests of interaction terms in models yielded P values ≤ .10 for 4/11 comparisons and ≤ .05 for 2/11 comparisons. In 3 additional comparisons, potentially important treatment variation on an absolute scale was observed despite interaction tests with P values > .10 on the relative scale. CONCLUSIONS: These trials were mainly composed of patient populations with CCI scores ≤4. Despite this, biologically plausible treatment interactions were commonly suggested. These results are hypothesis generating; confirmation of results would require larger studies or studies targeted specifically toward patients with higher levels of multimorbidity.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Multimorbilidad , Humanos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Modelos de Riesgos ProporcionalesRESUMEN
AIM: The action to control cardiovascular risk in diabetes (ACCORD) trial showed a neutral average treatment effect of intensive blood glucose and blood pressure (BP) controls in preventing major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in individuals with type 2 diabetes. Yet, treatment effects across patient subgroups have not been well understood. We aimed to identify patient subgroups that might benefit from intensive glucose or BP controls for preventing MACE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As a post-hoc analysis of the ACCORD trial, we included 10 251 individuals with type 2 diabetes. We applied causal forest and causal tree models to identify participant characteristics that modify the efficacy of intensive glucose or BP controls from 68 candidate variables (demographics, comorbidities, medications and biomarkers) at the baseline. The exposure was (a) intensive versus standard glucose control [glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) <6.0% vs. 7.0%-7.9%], and (b) intensive versus standard BP control (systolic BP <120 vs. <140 mmHg). The primary outcome was MACE. RESULTS: Compared with standard glucose control, intensive one reduced MACE in those with baseline HbA1c <8.5% [relative risk (RR): 0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.67-0.93] and those with estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥106 ml/min/1.73 m2 (RR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.55-0.99). Intensive BP control reduced MACE in those with normal high-density lipoprotein levels (women >55 mg/dl, men >45 mg/dl; RR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34-0.74). Risk reductions were not significant in other patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest heterogeneous treatment effects of intensive glucose and BP control and could provide biomarkers for future clinical trials to identify more precise HbA1c and BP treatment goals for individualized medicine.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Presión Sanguínea , Glucemia , Hemoglobina Glucada , Factores de Riesgo de Enfermedad Cardiaca , Biomarcadores , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & controlRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Polypills, containing various combinations of medications for primary and secondary CVD prevention, have been developed to enhance medication adherence and reduce the healthcare burden of CVD. However, their effectiveness compared to usual care remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of polypills on cardiovascular risk factors, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and medication adherence. METHODS: We conducted a comprehensive search for large-scale randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing the effects of polypills versus usual care on CVD risk factors and events. Outcomes included changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), lipid profiles, occurrence of MACE, and medication adherence. RESULTS: The use of polypills led to a statistically significant yet clinically modest reduction in SBP (mean difference -1.47 mmHg, 95% CI: -2.50 to -0.44, p<0.01) and DBP (mean difference- 1.10 mmHg, 95% CI: -1.68 to -0.51, p< 0.01) compared to usual care. Polypills also showed a significant reduction in the risk of MACE (RR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.77 -0.95, p<0.01). There was a non-significant reduction in LDL and HDL levels. Adherence to medication improved by up to 17% in polypill users compared to those on usual care (p < 0.01). A multivariable metaregression analysis suggested that adherence may be the underlying factor responsible for the observed effect of the polypills on blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Polypills were found to significantly reduce SBP, DBP and MACE. An improvement in medication adherence was also observed among polypill users, which might be responsible for the significant reduction in SBP observed users. Future research might benefit from exploring a more personalized approach to the composition of polypills, which could reveal a more clinically significant impact of increased adherence on CVD outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Combinación de Medicamentos , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Prevención Primaria/métodosRESUMEN
This case report describes a man in his 80s with a medical history of essential hypertension who presented to the emergency department with sudden onset epigastric pain.
Asunto(s)
Infarto del Miocardio , Humanos , Infarto del Miocardio/diagnóstico , ElectrocardiografíaRESUMEN
Background: Primary cardiac tumors are often benign and commonly present as cardiac myxomas (CMs) or papillary fibroelastomas (CPFEs). There is a paucity of prognostic indicators for tumor burden or potential for embolic cerebrovascular events (CVEs). This study was performed to address these gaps. Methods: Medical records at the University of Florida Health Shands Hospital between 1996 and 2021 were screened to identify patients with CMs or CPFEs. Clinical features, echocardiographic reports, and CVE outcomes were quantitatively assessed. Results: A total of 55 patients were included in the study: 28 CM (50.9%) and 27 CPFE (49.1%) patients. Baseline patient characteristics were similar among patients. The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio was correlated (p < 0.005 in all cases) to three metrics of tumor size in both CM (r = 64-67%) and CPFE (r = 56-59%). CVEs were the presenting symptom in 30 (54.5%) patients. CVE recurrence was high; the 5-year CVE recurrence rate in patients with tumor resection was 24.0% compared to 60.0% without resection. No baseline patient characteristics or tumor features were associated with an initial presentation of CVEs compared to any other indication. Univariate analysis indicated that prolonged duration to surgical resection, left atrial enlargement, male sex, and a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >3.0 at the follow-up were significantly associated with 5-year CVE recurrence. Left atrial enlargement and a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio >3.0 at the follow-up remained significantly associated with 5-year CVE recurrence in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: The neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio may prognosticate tumor size and recurrence of neurologic events. An increased risk of CVE within 5 years of mass resection is almost exclusive to patients initially presenting with CVEs.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies on the longitudinal effects of intense physical training on cardiac remodeling are limited, especially in American collegiate football players. HYPOTHESIS: College-level American football training will result in remodeling in a pattern consistent of a sport with moderate static and dynamic demands with increases in both wall and chamber sizes. METHODS: We studied 85 American collegiate football players who underwent transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) for asymptomatic or mild COVID-19-related illness and compared the changes in echo dimensions to their preparticipation screening TTE. Pre- and posttraining variables were compared using a paired t-test for normally distributed variables. RESULTS: Mean age was 19 years ± 1 and 61% of athletes were Black. Mean follow-up between TTEs was 21 ± 13 months. There was an increase in left atrial volume index (26.4 ± 5.5 to 32.8 ± 8.4 mL/m2 , p < .001), LV end diastolic diameter (5.13 ± 0.4 to 5.27 ± 0.4 cm, p = .003), basal RV diameter (3.28 ± 0.7 to 3.83 ± 0.5 cm, p = <.001), LV mass index (86.7 ± 15.3 to 90.1 ± 15.3, p = .015), and aortic root diameter (3.1 ± 0.4 to 3.2 ± 0.3 cm, p = .03) from pre- to posttraining, with a slightly greater magnitude in athletes with >2 years of training. Presence of left atrial enlargement (≥35 mL/m2 ) increased from 2.9% to 29% pre- to postparticipation in athletes with >2 years training. No significant changes in wall thickness, diastolic function, or right ventricular systolic function were observed. CONCLUSION: American football players college-level training was associated with increases in left and right ventricular chamber sizes, left atrial size, and aortic root diameter.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial , COVID-19 , Fútbol Americano , Humanos , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Remodelación Ventricular , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagenAsunto(s)
Apéndice Atrial , Fibrilación Atrial , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Apéndice Atrial/cirugía , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Fibrilación Atrial/tratamiento farmacológico , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Among patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE), abnormal cardiac biomarkers and elevated right ventricular to left ventricular (RV/LV) diameter ratio are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. However, subjects with baseline heart failure (HF) have abnormalities in cardiac chamber dimensions and biomarkers. We sought to describe risk stratification variables in a cohort with acute PE and categorized HF status as no HF, HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), or HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). In total, 182 subjects were identified for this study, of whom 142 were categorized as having no HF, 16 as having HFrEF, and 24 as having HFpEF. The median age was 65 years [interquartile range 51 to 75 years], and 43% were male. Subjects with HFrEF had significantly greater LV diameters and significantly lower RV/LV diameter ratio (no HF 0.94, HFrEF 0.65, HFpEF 0.89, p = 0.002). Subjects with HFrEF also had significantly higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels (no HF 112 pg/mL, HFrEF 835 pg/mL, HFpEF 241 pg/mL, p <0.001) and higher 90-day mortality rates. Among subjects with acute PE, those with baseline HFrEF had significantly greater LV diameter and lower RV/LV diameter ratio than those of patients with HFpEF or no HF. In addition, subjects with HFrEF had significantly higher B-type natriuretic peptide levels and worse survival at 90 days. In conclusion, these results indicate that PE risk stratification using current guidelines, especially reliance on RV/LV ratio, is inaccurate among subjects with baseline HFrEF.
Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Embolia Pulmonar , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Péptido Natriurético Encefálico , Volumen Sistólico , Biomarcadores , Enfermedad Aguda , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Medición de Riesgo , PronósticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The association between statins and incident diabetes mellitus (DM) in observational studies is much larger than that reported from randomized controlled trials. We sought to assess this association using a novel design controlling for selection bias. METHODS: Using data from MarketScan, we identified a cohort of non-diabetic patients who initiated a statin and matched them to patients not taking statins. From the statin-user cohort, we identified two subgroups: patients who received statin refills for >6 months (continuers) and patients who received statin refills <6 months (discontinuers). Patients were followed for a minimum of two years to determine incident DM. RESULTS: We included 442,526 patients, divided equally between statin users and non-users. Statin use was associated with increased DM (9.9% vs. 4.4%, HR 2.2, p < 0.001). Among the 221,263 statin users, there were 194,357 continuers and 26,906 discontinuers. There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of DM between both groups (10.0% vs. 9.3%, HR 1.03, p = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: Statin use was strongly associated with incident diabetes when users were compared to non-users but not when continuers were compared to discontinuers. Selection bias confounds the association between statin use and incident diabetes in observational studies.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas , Humanos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/efectos adversos , Incidencia , Sesgo de Selección , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus/etiologíaRESUMEN
Beta-blockers (ßB) are a frequently used class of medications. Although ßB have many indications, those related to cardiovascular disease are among the most common and important. However, in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), ßB are used less often due to concerns about an unfavorable impact on respiratory morbidity and mortality. We performed a systematic review to assess the safety of ßB in patients with COPD. We included a total of 2 randomized controlled trials and 28 observational studies. The majority found statistically significant reductions in mortality. The two higher quality observational studies reported increased mortality with ßB. The risk of COPD exacerbations was reduced in about half of the studies. Nonetheless, there were significant biases that confounded the results. The highest quality RCT found a significant increase in severe and very severe COPD exacerbations with ßB use. In conclusion, data on the safety of ßB in patients with COPD are conflicting. However, given higher quality evidence showed harm with their use, ßB should be prescribed with caution in patients with COPD, including patients with cardiac indication for ßB.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Humanos , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Class IC antiarrhythmics are generally considered a safe means of treating many common arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation (a-fib), atrial flutter (a-flutter), and paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT). Essentially, flecainide works by binding and blocking sodium channels more effectively at higher heart rates. However, this class of drugs is known to exhibit use dependence which could predispose patients to the development of malignant arrhythmias during episodes of tachycardia. In this case, we present a patient who was being treated with flecainide for a-fib who ultimately developed a wide complex tachycardia after her metoprolol was held.
RESUMEN
This study aimed to assess long-term resource utilization and outcomes in patients with acute chest pain who underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and stress echocardiography (SE). This was a retrospective, propensity-matched analysis of health insurance claims data for a national sample of privately insured patients over the period January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2014. There were 3,816 patients matched 1:1 who received either CCTA (nâ¯=â¯1,908) or SE (nâ¯=â¯1,908). Patients were seen in the emergency department (ED) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2011 with a primary diagnosis of chest pain and received either CCTA or SE within 72 hours as the first noninvasive test and maintained continuous enrollment in the database from the time of the ED encounter through December 31, 2014. All individual patient data were censored at 3 years. Compared with SE, CCTA was associated with higher odds of downstream cardiac catheterization (9.9% vs 7.7%, adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.00 to 1.63), future noninvasive testing (27.7% vs 22.3%, AOR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.42), and return ED visits or hospitalization for chest pain at 3 years (33.1% vs 24.2%, AOR 1.37, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.59). There were no statistically significant differences in new statin use (15.5% vs 14.9%, AOR 1.04, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.28), coronary revascularization (2.7% vs 2.2%, AOR 1.25, 95% CI 0.77 to 2.01) or hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction (0.9% vs 0.9%, AOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.47 to 1.99). In conclusion, in patients who present to the ED with chest pain, CCTA is associated with increased downstream resource utilization compared with SE with no differences in long-term cardiovascular outcomes.