Comparative retention and effectiveness of migraine preventive treatments: A nationwide registry-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Little is known about the comparative effects of migraine preventive drugs. We aimed to estimate treatment retention and effectiveness of migraine preventive drugs in a nationwide registry-based cohort study in Norway between 2010 and 2020. METHODS: We assessed retention, defined as the number of uninterrupted treatment days, and effectiveness, defined as the reduction in filled triptan prescriptions during four 90-day periods after the first preventive prescription, compared to a 90-day baseline period. We compared retention and efficacy for different drugs against beta blockers. Comparative retention was estimated with hazard ratios (HRs), adjusted for covariates, using Cox regression, and effectiveness as odds ratios (ORs) using logistic regression, with propensity-weighted adjustment for covariates. RESULTS: We identified 104,072 migraine patients, 81,890 of whom were female (78.69%) and whose mean (standard deviation) age was 44.60 (15.61) years. Compared to beta blockers, botulinum toxin (HR 0.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.44) and calcitonin gene-related peptide pathway antibodies (CGRPabs; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.59-0.66) were the least likely to be discontinued, while clonidine (HR 2.95, 95% CI 2.88-3.02) and topiramate (HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.31-1.37) were the most likely to be discontinued. Patients on simvastatin, CGRPabs, and amitriptyline were more likely to achieve a clinically significant reduction in triptan use during the first 90 days of treatment, with propensity score-adjusted ORs of 1.28 (95% CI 1.19-1.38), 1.23 (95% CI 0.79-1.90), and 1.13 (95% CI 1.08-1.17), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We found a favorable effect of CGRPabs, amitriptyline, and simvastatin compared with beta blockers, while topiramate and clonidine were associated with poorer outcomes.

[A 60-year-old woman with asthenia and dyspnoea]. / En 60 år gammel kvinne med asteni og dyspné.

Coronary artery aneurysms are uncommon and the prevalence in patients undergoing coronary artery angiography is 1.5-4.9%. The most common cause of coronary artery aneurysm is arteriosclerosis, followed by Kawasaki disease, periarteritis nodosa, systemic lupus erythematosus, syphilis, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease and trauma. Most coronary aneurysms remain asymptomatic. Patients may present symptoms of angina or myocardial infarction due to thrombosis within the aneurysm. This would lead to occlusion of the coronary artery or to distal thromboembolisms. There is no consensus on how to manage coronary artery aneurysms. Medical therapies include aspirin as well as warfarin. Surgery may be performed in patients with a large aneurysm, i.e. when the risk of rupture or thrombosis is high. We present a 60-year-old female patient with symptoms of a transient ischaemic attack followed by a period of fever, nausea, vomiting and ecchymoses on the lower extremity. Transthoracic and transoesophageal echocardiography was suggestive of a tumour located at the basis of the lateral wall of the right atrium. Heart surgery revealed, however, a large right coronary aneurysm and an atrial septum defect of the secundum type.