Ectomycorrhizal fungal communities of Coccoloba uvifera (L.) L. mature trees and seedlings in the neotropical coastal forests of Guadeloupe (Lesser Antilles).

We studied belowground and aboveground diversity and distribution of ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungal species colonizing Coccoloba uvifera (L.) L. (seagrape) mature trees and seedlings naturally regenerating in four littoral forests of the Guadeloupe island (Lesser Antilles). We collected 546 sporocarps, 49 sclerotia, and morphotyped 26,722 root tips from mature trees and seedlings. Seven EM fungal species only were recovered among sporocarps (Cantharellus cinnabarinus, Amanita arenicola, Russula cremeolilacina, Inocybe littoralis, Inocybe xerophytica, Melanogaster sp., and Scleroderma bermudense) and one EM fungal species from sclerotia (Cenococcum geophilum). After internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing, the EM root tips fell into 15 EM fungal taxa including 14 basidiomycetes and 1 ascomycete identified. Sporocarp survey only weakly reflected belowground assessment of the EM fungal community, although 5 fruiting species were found on roots. Seagrape seedlings and mature trees had very similar communities of EM fungi, dominated by S. bermudense, R. cremeolilacina, and two Thelephoraceae: shared species represented 93 % of the taxonomic EM fungal diversity and 74 % of the sampled EM root tips. Furthermore, some significant differences were observed between the frequencies of EM fungal taxa on mature trees and seedlings. The EM fungal community composition also varied between the four investigated sites. We discuss the reasons for such a species-poor community and the possible role of common mycorrhizal networks linking seagrape seedlings and mature trees in regeneration of coastal forests.

Assessment of DNA extraction methods for detection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant roots by nested-PCR / Avaliação de métodos de extração de ADN para detecção de fungos micorrízicos arbusculares em raízes de plantas por nested-PCR

DNA extraction methods were evaluated for the yield and purity of DNA recovered from mycorrhized roots and whether the recovered DNA is suitable for amplification of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal SSU rDNA. The DNeasy Plant Mini Kit and three extraction buffers were used alone or in combination with either polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) and/or activated charcoal (AC). Among the extraction methods tested, those based on the CTAB buffers yielded more DNA than those based on the TE buffer and the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit. Moreover, the use of AC alone or in combination with PVPP reduced DNA yield, while it significantly improved the purity of recovered DNA, whatever the extraction buffer. On the other hand, the success of nested-PCR amplification was negatively correlated with the amount of template DNA and positively correlated with the purity of recovered DNA. Three methods based on the TE buffer, two on the CTAB-ßM buffer and one on the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit produced high-quality DNA in terms of purity and PCR performance. However, the TE buffer-based methods are less time consuming than the CTAB-ßM buffer-based methods, and cheaper than the method based on the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit.

Diferentes métodos de extração de ADN, a partir de amostras de raízes, foram testados e o ADN obtido foi avaliado para a amplificação de genes ribossomais de fungos micorrízicos arbusculares (AM). Três tampões de extração foram utilizados isoladamente ou em combinação com polivinilpirrolidona (PVP), polivinipolipirrolidona (PVPP) e/ou carvão ativado (CA), além do DNeasy Plant Mini Kit. Entre os métodos de extração testados, aqueles com base no tampão CTAB renderam mais ADN do que os baseados no tampão TE e o DNeasy Plant Mini Kit. A utilização de CA ou PVPP nos diferentes tampões reduziram o rendimento de ADN, contudo, melhoraram significativamente a pureza do ADN recuperado, independentemente do tampão de extração. Por outro lado, o sucesso da amplificação por Nested-PCR foi negativamente correlacionado com a quantidade de DNA molde, e positivamente correlacionada com a pureza do ADN. Três métodos baseados no tampão TE, dois no tampão CTAB-ßM e o DNeasy Plant Mini Kit produziram ADN de alta qualidade, em termos de pureza e rendimento da PCR. No entanto, os métodos baseados em tampão TE demandam menos tempo do que os métodos baseados em tampão CTAB-ßM e são mais baratos do que o uso do DNeasy Plant Mini Kit.

Assessment of DNA extraction methods for detection of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in plant roots by nested-PCR / Avaliação de métodos de extração de ADN para detecção de fungos micorrízicos arbusculares em raízes de plantas por nested-PCR

DNA extraction methods were evaluated for the yield and purity of DNA recovered from mycorrhized roots and whether the recovered DNA is suitable for amplification of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal SSU rDNA. The DNeasy Plant Mini Kit and three extraction buffers were used alone or in combination with either polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) and/or activated charcoal (AC). Among the extraction methods tested, those based on the CTAB buffers yielded more DNA than those based on the TE buffer and the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit. Moreover, the use of AC alone or in combination with PVPP reduced DNA yield, while it significantly improved the purity of recovered DNA, whatever the extraction buffer. On the other hand, the success of nested-PCR amplification was negatively correlated with the amount of template DNA and positively correlated with the purity of recovered DNA. Three methods based on the TE buffer, two on the CTAB-M buffer and one on the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit produced high-quality DNA in terms of purity and PCR performance. However, the TE buffer-based methods are less time consuming than the CTAB-M buffer-based methods, and cheaper than the method based on the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit.(AU)

Diferentes métodos de extração de ADN, a partir de amostras de raízes, foram testados e o ADN obtido foi avaliado para a amplificação de genes ribossomais de fungos micorrízicos arbusculares (AM). Três tampões de extração foram utilizados isoladamente ou em combinação com polivinilpirrolidona (PVP), polivinipolipirrolidona (PVPP) e/ou carvão ativado (CA), além do DNeasy Plant Mini Kit. Entre os métodos de extração testados, aqueles com base no tampão CTAB renderam mais ADN do que os baseados no tampão TE e o DNeasy Plant Mini Kit. A utilização de CA ou PVPP nos diferentes tampões reduziram o rendimento de ADN, contudo, melhoraram significativamente a pureza do ADN recuperado, independentemente do tampão de extração. Por outro lado, o sucesso da amplificação por Nested-PCR foi negativamente correlacionado com a quantidade de DNA molde, e positivamente correlacionada com a pureza do ADN. Três métodos baseados no tampão TE, dois no tampão CTAB-M e o DNeasy Plant Mini Kit produziram ADN de alta qualidade, em termos de pureza e rendimento da PCR. No entanto, os métodos baseados em tampão TE demandam menos tempo do que os métodos baseados em tampão CTAB-M e são mais baratos do que o uso do DNeasy Plant Mini Kit.(AU)