Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 24(1): 44-7, 2010 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19734007

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inadvertent subclavian artery catheterization during attempted central venous access is a well-known complication. Historically, these patients are managed with an open operative approach and repair under direct vision via an infraclavicular and/or supraclavicular incision. We describe our experience and technique for endovascular management of these injuries. METHODS: Twenty patients were identified with inadvertent iatrogenic subclavian artery cannulation. All cases were managed via an endovascular technique under local anesthesia. After correcting any coagulopathy, a 4-French glide catheter was percutaneously inserted into the ipsilateral brachial artery and placed in the proximal subclavian artery. Following an arteriogram and localization of the subclavian arterial insertion site, the subclavian catheter was removed and bimanual compression was performed on both sides of the clavicle around the puncture site for 20 min. A second angiogram was performed, and if there was any extravasation, pressure was held for an additional 20 min. If hemostasis was still not obtained, a stent graft was placed via the brachial access site to repair the arterial defect and control the bleeding. RESULTS: Two of the 20 patients required a stent graft for continued bleeding after compression. Both patients were well excluded after endovascular graft placement. Hemostasis was successfully obtained with bimanual compression over the puncture site in the remaining 18 patients. There were no resultant complications at either the subclavian or the brachial puncture site. CONCLUSION: This minimally invasive endovascular approach to iatrogenic subclavian artery injury is a safe alternative to blind removal with manual compression or direct open repair.


Asunto(s)
Implantación de Prótesis Vascular , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Hemorragia/terapia , Técnicas Hemostáticas , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Arteria Subclavia/lesiones , Heridas Penetrantes/terapia , Prótesis Vascular , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/instrumentación , Hemorragia/diagnóstico por imagen , Hemorragia/etiología , Técnicas Hemostáticas/instrumentación , Humanos , Presión , Radiografía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents , Arteria Subclavia/diagnóstico por imagen , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Heridas Penetrantes/diagnóstico por imagen , Heridas Penetrantes/etiología
2.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 3(6): 633-41, 1999.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10554371

RESUMEN

Attempts have been made to salvage failed ileal pouch-anal anastomoses (IPAA) performed for ulcerative colitis or familial polyposis coli. These can be categorized as total reconstruction of the IPAA, partial transabdominal approach, and partial transperineal approach. The aims of our study were to determine the overall success of pouch salvage; to examine the demographics, indications, and outcomes for each approach; and to assess anorectal physiology and patient satisfaction in those with successful salvage operations. We reviewed data, including results of anorectal manometry, from 29 patients undergoing salvage procedures for failed IPAA. Seventeen salvage attempts were successful, 11 attempts failed, and one patient was lost to follow-up. Success rates were 100% in the total reconstruction group, 25% in the partial transabdominal group, and 55% in the transperineal group. In those undergoing total reconstruction of the IPAA (n = 9), functional outcome, as measured by incontinence, improved with 50% reporting incontinence preoperatively compared to 0% postoperatively (P = 0.055). Mean 24-hour stool frequency and nighttime stool frequency declined. All patients reported satisfaction with their outcomes. Sixty percent of patients who underwent ileal pouch salvage following IPAA have been successful in avoiding permanent ileostomy. These results suggest that a continued effort to salvage failed IPAA, including the use of total reconstruction, is a viable alternative to permanent ileostomy.


Asunto(s)
Poliposis Adenomatosa del Colon/cirugía , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Proctocolectomía Restauradora , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Ileostomía , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Reoperación , Terapia Recuperativa
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA