RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lentigo maligna (LM) is associated with disproportionately high surgical morbidity. OBJECTIVE: The authors report on 2 strategies to reduce the surgical morbidity associated with LM. METHODS: Forty LM lesions were removed with excisional biopsies without margins and closed with purse-string sutures. Invasive cases underwent staged excisions with 10-mm margins. Cases without invasion were treated with neoadjuvant topical imiquimod 5% cream (5 d/wk × 8 weeks) followed by conservative staged excisions with 2-mm margins using radial sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin and immunostaining with Mart-1, with or without SOX10. RESULTS: Invasion was detected in 12/40 (30%) of the excisional biopsy specimens (average depth 0.45 mm). No invasion was detected in 28/40 (70%). All 24 patients who completed neoadjuvant topical imiquimod 5% cream before staged excisions had negative first-stage margins at 2 mm. Compared with average published margins for LM, this represents a 71.4% reduction in the required margin and an average reduction in the final surgical defect by 74%. CONCLUSION: LM treatment by excisional biopsies with a purse-string closure enables accurate tumor staging and contracts the tumor footprint to its minimal size. Subsequent neoadjuvant imiquimod followed by a conservative staged excision with 2-mm margins allows for removal of LM with decreased surgical morbidity.
Asunto(s)
Peca Melanótica de Hutchinson/terapia , Imiquimod/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/terapia , Herida Quirúrgica/terapia , Técnicas de Sutura , Administración Cutánea , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/métodos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The commercial tanning industry has opposed efforts to educate the public on the risks of tanning as well as attempts to restrict minors' access to tanning services. Despite a paucity of supporting literature, statements from the tanning industry claiming that dermatologists routinely use in-office phototherapy for cosmetic treatments and refer patients to tanning salons have successfully derailed and defeated legislation in many states. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate dermatologist referrals for ultraviolet radiation for cosmetic and medical purposes via tanning beds or phototherapy, as well as their opinions on tanning, legislation, and ultraviolet radiation counseling practices. DESIGN: The study was conducted using a 10-question anonymous survey. SETTING: The participants were surveyed during meetings of three regional dermatologic societies. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred and fifty-two dermatologists attending society meetings participated in the study. MEASURES: The authors measured physician referrals, opinions, and recommendations regarding ultraviolet exposure. RESULTS: Zero physicians (0/152) recommended tanning salons for cosmetic reasons. These 152 dermatologists referred 458 (417 adult, 41 pediatric) out of an estimated 809,369 patients (0.057%) to tanning salons for medical treatment. Of these physicians, 76 out of 152 and 15 out of 152 reported referring at least one adult or one pediatric patient, respectively, within the last year. All respondents supported ultraviolet tanning legislation and discouraged cosmetic tanning. CONCLUSION: These findings directly contradict the assertion that dermatologists use ultraviolet radiation for cosmetic purposes or routinely refer patients to tanning salons. This study underscores the complex nature of ultraviolet radiation, as dermatologists infrequently utilize ultraviolet radiation for medical purposes and unanimously support restrictive legislation. In addition, these dermatologists counsel against cosmetic tanning and list tanning bed use among their highest concerns with regard to the health of pediatric patients.
RESUMEN
Teenage use of indoor tanning has reached epidemic proportions. There is no federal ban on teen use; rather, it is left to each state to determine policy. We conducted a state-by-state analysis using data from each state's statutes and regulations and supplementary information from the National Conference of State Legislatures. First, we refined an earlier 35-item instrument to now include 56 items that extensively measures age bans, parental involvement, warnings/information, enforcement, and operating requirements. To grade each tanning law, we developed a uniform scoring system with a goal of providing performance data for future comparisons. As of August 2012, 13 states had no tanning facility statute or regulation for minors. In states with some regulations, teen bans are lax-nearly uniformly, most young children under the age of 14 can legally tan with or without suboptimal parental consent or accompaniment laws. Strong Food and Drug Administration involvement can simplify and unify the inconsistencies that exist among states' indoor tanning laws. Until consistent regulations are promulgated and enforced, such an instrument can provide a benchmark for state investigations into the deficiencies and progress of their laws, as well as facilitate direct comparison between states for research and educational purposes.
Asunto(s)
Industria de la Belleza/legislación & jurisprudencia , Consentimiento Paterno/legislación & jurisprudencia , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Baño de Sol/legislación & jurisprudencia , United States Food and Drug Administration/legislación & jurisprudencia , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Cutáneas/epidemiología , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: The use of social media by dermatology journals and professional and patient-centered dermatology organizations remains largely unknown and, to our knowledge, has yet to be fully evaluated. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and quantify the extent of involvement of dermatology journals, professional dermatology organizations, and dermatology-related patient advocate groups on social networking sites. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We obtained an archived list of 102 current dermatology journals from SCImago on the World Wide Web and used the list to investigate Facebook, Twitter, and individual journal websites for the presence of social media accounts. We identified professional and patient-centered dermatology organization activity on social networks through queries of predetermined search terms on Google, Facebook, Twitter, and LinkedIn. The activity of each entity was documented by recording the following metrics of popularity: the numbers of Facebook "likes," Twitter "followers," and LinkedIn "members." MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The numbers of Facebook likes, Twitter followers, and LinkedIn members corresponding to each dermatology journal and each professional and patient-related dermatology organization. RESULTS: On July 17, 2012, of the 102 dermatology journals ranked by SCImago, 12.7% were present on Facebook and 13.7% on Twitter. We identified popular dermatology journals based on Facebook likes and Twitter followers, led by the Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology and Dermatology Times, respectively. Popular professional dermatology organizations included dermRounds Dermatology Network (11 251 likes on Facebook and 2900 followers on Twitter). The most popular dermatology patient-centered organizations were the Skin Cancer Foundation (20 119 likes on Facebook), DermaTalk (21 542 followers on Twitter), and the National Psoriasis Foundation (200 members on LinkedIn). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Patient-centered and professional dermatology organizations use social networking sites; however, academic journals tend to lag behind significantly. Although some journals are active in social media, most have yet to recognize the potential benefits of fully embracing popular social networks.
Asunto(s)
Dermatología , Publicaciones Periódicas como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Medios de Comunicación Sociales/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas/estadística & datos numéricos , Comunicación en Salud/métodos , Humanos , Internet/estadística & datos numéricos , Defensa del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administraciónRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: With advancements in mobile technology, cellular phone-based mobile applications (apps) may be used in the practice and delivery of dermatologic care. OBJECTIVE: To identify and categorize the variety of current mobile apps available in dermatology for patients and providers. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Dermatology-related search terms were queried in the online app stores of the most commonly used mobile platforms developed by Apple, Android, Blackberry, Nokia, and Windows. Applications were assigned to categories based on description. Popularity, price, and reviews were recorded and target audiences were determined through websites offering online mobile apps. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Number, type, and price of mobile apps in dermatology. RESULTS: A total of 229 dermatology-related apps were identified in the following categories: general dermatology reference (61 [26.6%]), self-surveillance/diagnosis (41 [17.9%]), disease guide (39 [17.0%]), educational aid (20 [8.7%]), sunscreen/UV recommendation (19 [8.3%]), calculator (12 [5.2%]), teledermatology (8 [3.5%]), conference (6 [2.6%]), journal (6 [2.6%]), photograph storage/sharing (5 [2.2%]), dermoscopy (2 [0.9%]), pathology (2 [0.9%]), and other (8 [3.5%]). The most reviewed apps included Ultraviolet ~ UV Index (355 reviews), VisualDx (306), SPF (128), iSore (61), and SpotMole (50). There were 209 unique apps, with 17 apps existing on more than 1 operating system. More than half of the apps were offered free of charge (117 [51.1%]). Paid apps (112 [48.9%]) ranged from $0.99 to $139.99 (median, $2.99). Target audiences included patient (117 [51.1%]), health care provider (94 [41.0%]), and both (18 [7.9%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The widespread variety and popularity of mobile apps demonstrate a great potential to expand the practice and delivery of dermatologic care.
Asunto(s)
Teléfono Celular/estadística & datos numéricos , Computadoras de Mano/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Dermatología/tendencias , Aplicaciones Móviles/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Teléfono Celular/economía , Computadoras de Mano/economía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Internet , Aplicaciones Móviles/economía , Satisfacción del Paciente , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Piel/terapia , Telemedicina/economía , Telemedicina/tendenciasRESUMEN
Exposure to ultraviolet radiation from indoor tanning device use is associated with an increased risk of skin cancer, including risk of malignant melanoma, and is an urgent public health problem. By reducing indoor tanning, future cases of skin cancer could be prevented, along with the associated morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. On August 20, 2012, the CDC hosted a meeting to discuss the current body of evidence on strategies to reduce indoor tanning as well as research gaps. Using the Action Model to Achieve Healthy People 2020 Overarching Goals as a framework, the current paper provides highlights on the topics that were discussed, including (1) the state of the evidence on strategies to reduce indoor tanning; (2) the tools necessary to effectively assess, monitor, and evaluate the short- and long-term impact of interventions designed to reduce indoor tanning; and (3) strategies to align efforts at the national, state, and local levels through transdisciplinary collaboration and coordination across multiple sectors. Although many challenges and barriers exist, a coordinated, multilevel, transdisciplinary approach has the potential to reduce indoor tanning and prevent future cases of skin cancer.
Asunto(s)
Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/prevención & control , Investigación , Neoplasias Cutáneas/prevención & control , Baño de Sol , Adolescente , Adulto , Industria de la Belleza/legislación & jurisprudencia , Niño , Femenino , Programas Gente Sana , Humanos , Medios de Comunicación de Masas , Melanoma/prevención & control , Neoplasias Cutáneas/etiología , Rayos Ultravioleta/efectos adversos , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Exposure to ultraviolet radiation from indoor tanning devices (tanning beds, booths, and sun lamps) or from the sun contributes to the risk of skin cancer, including melanoma, which is the type of skin cancer responsible for most deaths. Indoor tanning is common among certain groups, especially among older adolescents and young adults, adolescent girls and young women, and non-Hispanic whites. Increased understanding of the health risks associated with indoor tanning has led to many efforts to reduce use. Most environmental and systems efforts in the U.S. (e.g., age limits or requiring parental consent/accompaniment) have occurred at the state level. At the national level, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Federal Trade Commission regulate indoor tanning devices and advertising, respectively. The current paper provides a brief review of (1) the evidence on indoor tanning as a risk factor for skin cancer; (2) factors that may influence use of indoor tanning devices at the population level; and (3) various environmental and systems options available for consideration when developing strategies to reduce indoor tanning. This information provides the context and background for the companion paper in this issue of the American Journal of Preventive Medicine, which summarizes highlights from an informal expert meeting convened by the CDC in August 2012 to identify opportunities to prevent skin cancer by reducing use of indoor tanning devices.