Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Circulation ; 125(16): 1997-2005, 2012 Apr 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22431865

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Warfarin is characterized by marked variations in individual dose requirements and a narrow therapeutic window. Pharmacogenetics (PG) could improve dosing efficiency and safety, but clinical trials evidence is meager. METHODS AND RESULTS: A Randomized and Clinical Effectiveness Trial Comparing Two Pharmacogenetic Algorithms and Standard Care for Individualizing Warfarin Dosing (CoumaGen-II) comprised 2 comparisons: (1) a blinded, randomized comparison of a modified 1-step (PG-1) with a 3-step algorithm (PG-2) (N=504), and (2) a clinical effectiveness comparison of PG guidance with use of either algorithm with standard dosing in a parallel control group (N=1866). A rapid method provided same-day CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genotyping. Primary outcomes were percentage of out-of-range international normalized ratios at 1 and 3 months and percentage of time in therapeutic range. Primary analysis was modified intention to treat. In the randomized comparison, PG-2 was noninferior but not superior to PG-1 for percentage of out-of-range international normalized ratios at 1 month and 3 months and for percentage of time in therapeutic range at 3 months. However, the combined PG cohort was superior to the parallel controls (percentage of out-of-range international normalized ratios 31% versus 42% at 1 month; 30% versus 42% at 3 months; percentage of time in therapeutic range 69% versus 58%, 71% versus 59%, respectively, all P<0.001). Differences persisted after adjustment for age, sex, and clinical indication. There were fewer percentage international normalized ratios ≥4 and ≤1.5 and serious adverse events at 3 months (4.5% versus 9.4% of patients, P<0.001) with PG guidance. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PG dosing should be considered for broader clinical application, a proposal that is being tested further in 3 major randomized trials. The simpler 1-step PG algorithm provided equivalent results and may be preferable for clinical application. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00927862.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Anticoagulantes/administración & dosificación , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Hidrocarburo de Aril Hidroxilasas/genética , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C9 , Femenino , Humanos , Relación Normalizada Internacional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta/genética , Farmacogenética , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina K Epóxido Reductasas , Adulto Joven
2.
Circulation ; 116(22): 2563-70, 2007 Nov 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17989110

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pharmacogenetic-guided dosing of warfarin is a promising application of "personalized medicine" but has not been adequately tested in randomized trials. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consenting patients (n=206) being initiated on warfarin were randomized to pharmacogenetic-guided or standard dosing. Buccal swab DNA was genotyped for CYP2C9 *2 and CYP2C9 *3 and VKORC1C1173T with a rapid assay. Standard dosing followed an empirical protocol, whereas pharmacogenetic-guided dosing followed a regression equation including the 3 genetic variants and age, sex, and weight. Prothrombin time international normalized ratio (INR) was measured routinely on days 0, 3, 5, 8, 21, 60, and 90. A research pharmacist unblinded to treatment strategy managed dose adjustments. Patients were followed up for up to 3 months. Pharmacogenetic-guided predicted doses more accurately approximated stable doses (P<0.001), resulting in smaller (P=0.002) and fewer (P=0.03) dosing changes and INRs (P=0.06). However, percent out-of-range INRs (pharmacogenetic = 30.7%, standard = 33.1%), the primary end point, did not differ significantly between arms. Despite this, when restricted to wild-type patients (who required larger doses; P=0.001) and multiple variant carriers (who required smaller doses; P<0.001) in exploratory analyses, results (pharmacogenetic = 29%, standard = 39%) achieved nominal significance (P=0.03). Multiple variant allele carriers were at increased risk of an INR of > or = 4 (P=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: An algorithm guided by pharmacogenetic and clinical factors improved the accuracy and efficiency of warfarin dose initiation. Despite this, the primary end point of a reduction in out-of-range INRs was not achieved. In subset analyses, pharmacogenetic guidance showed promise for wild-type and multiple variant genotypes.


Asunto(s)
Hidrocarburo de Aril Hidroxilasas/genética , Oxigenasas de Función Mixta/genética , Farmacogenética/métodos , Warfarina/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Citocromo P-450 CYP2C9 , Cálculo de Dosificación de Drogas , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Femenino , Genotipo , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vitamina K Epóxido Reductasas
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...