Comparison of measurements of time outdoors and light levels as risk factors for myopia in young Singapore children.

AIMS: To compare methods to measure time outdoor and light levels, two possible predictors of myopia, in Singapore children. METHODS: Outdoor time from a diary and portable light meter over a 1-week period was compared in 117 Singapore children aged 6-12 years with and without myopia. All children wore a (HOBO Pendant temp/light Part # UA-002-64) light meter for 1 week and the parents filled the 7-day outdoor diary to track the outdoor activity. RESULTS: Mean outdoor time from diary and time with light levels was 5.44 hours per week and 7.91 hours per week, respectively, during school term and school holidays. Time spent with light levels of >1000 Lux from the light meter were 7.08 h per week and 9.81 h per week, respectively, during school term and school holidays. The intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.21 and 0.28 for outdoor time from the diary and light meter (1000 Lux cut-off) during the school term and holidays, respectively. The correlation coefficient was 0.34 (95% CI 0.05, 0.58) for a weekday during school holidays, 0.17 (-0.14, 0.45) for a weekday during school term, 0.07 (-0.16, 0.29) for a weekday during school term, and 0.25 (0.02, 0.46) for a weekend during school term. CONCLUSIONS: The agreement between the light meter and 1-week diary was poor to fair. Both instruments measure different parameters, time outdoors and light intensity, and could therefore capture different aspects of risk in future myopia studies.

[Prognostic factors and etiology in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia admitted at the ICU. Spanish multicenter study. Study Group on Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Spain]. / Factores pronósticos y etiología de los pacientes con neumonía comunitaria grave ingresados en UCI. Estudio multicéntrico español. Grupo de Estudio de Neumonía Comunitaria Grave en Espanña.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the techniques used for the etiological diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) and to describe the predominant causative organisms as well as prognostic factors of ICU mortality. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 262 patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to 26 ICUs between 1 November of 1991 and 31 October of 1992 were included in a prospective, open, multicenter study. RESULTS: The diagnostic techniques most frequently used were blood culture (243 cases) and simple tracheal aspirate (166 cases). Simple tracheal aspirate (58.4%), bronchoalveolar lavage (47.7%), and protected-specimen brush (44.2%) were the techniques that showed the highest diagnostic reliability. In 220 cases, techniques considered of high diagnostic probability were employed. With the use of these procedures, the most frequent causative pathogens were Streptococcus pneumoniae (13.6%) and Legionella pneumophila (9.5%). In 100 cases (45.5%), no pathogen was isolated. A total of 88 patients (33.6%) died during the ICU stay. Predictive variables of poor outcome selected by means of a multivariate analysis were as follows: multisystemic failure (OR = 28.6; 95% CI: 12.8-65.1; p = 0.0001), APACHE II at the time of ICU admission (OR = 5.3; 95% CI: 2.5-11.3; p = 0.0001), progression and/or spread of lung infection (OR = 4.5; 95% CI: 2.4-8.4; p = 0.0001), and shock on admission (OR = 8.48; 95% CI: 4.5-15.9; p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In 45.5% of patients with community-acquired pneumonia admitted to ICU, no causative pathogen was identified. The prognosis of these patients was influenced by the severity of disease assessed by APACHE II score and presence of multisystemic failure and shock at the time of ICU admission.