A prospective cohort of American Indian and Alaska Native people: study design, methods, and implementation.

In 2001, the National Cancer Institute funded three centers to test the feasibility of establishing a cohort of American Indian and Alaska Native people. Participating tribal organizations named the study EARTH (Education and Research Towards Health). This paper describes the study methods. A computerized data collection and tracking system was developed using audio computer-assisted survey methodology with touch screens. Data were collected on diet, physical activity, lifestyle and cultural practices, medical and reproductive history, and family history of heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. In addition, a small panel of medical measurements was obtained, including height, weight, waist and hip circumferences, blood pressure, and a lipid panel plus glucose. At the completion of the enrollment visit, data were used to provide immediate health feedback to study participants. During the initial funding period, the authors anticipate enrolling 16,000 American Indian and Alaska Native participants. The age distribution of the study population was similar to that reported in the 2000 US Census for the relevant populations. A component critical to the success of the EARTH Study has been the partnerships with tribal members. The study has focused on involvement of American Indian and Alaska Native communities in development and implementation and on provision of feedback to participants and communities.

Cancer mortality among Alaska natives, 1994-1998.

Although overall cancer mortality rates in the U.S. declined throughout the 1990s, Alaska Native rates increased. This study compares mortality patterns of Alaska Natives for the period, 1994-1998, and U.S. Whites, and examines changes in rates since 1960-1969. We used death certificate data and Indian Health Service population estimates to create age-adjusted mortality rates for Alaska Natives. We compared these rates to NCHS mortality for U.S. Whites. In all, 597 Alaska Natives died of cancer over the five-year period, 1994-1998, their age-adjusted average annual mortality rate (224.5 per 100,000) was thirty percent higher than that of U.S. Whites (166.7 per 100,000), a statistically significant excess (OR = 1.3, 95% CI: 1.2-1.4). Alaska Natives were forty percent more likely to die of lung cancer than U.S. Whites (OR = 1.4, 95% CI: 1.2-1.6). This population also demonstrated elevated mortality rates for several other smoking-related cancers. Also, Alaska Natives are at excess risk for nearly all cancers of the digestive system. Alaska Natives experienced the same or lower mortality rates for genitourinary cancers excluding cancer of the kidney. Smoking related cancers, and particularly, lung cancer, were the major contributors to the excess mortality rates. These data suggest that the burden of cancer on the Alaska Native healthcare system will continue to increase as the population ages. Intensified efforts to modify behavioral risk factors are needed.

Cancer incidence in Alaska Natives thirty-year report 1969-1998.

The Alaska Native Tumor Registry includes data from 1969 to the present. This report provides incidence rates over the thirty year period, 1969 through 1998, and compares trends over time for Alaska Natives (AN) with those of US Whites and Blacks. To examine current rates, average annual age-adjusted incidence rates for AN for 1984-98 are compared with US Whites. Data from the registry document numerous differences in rates of occurrence of specific cancers compared to US Whites and Blacks. Studies of these differences may provide clues to the causes and risk factors for the cancers. Most importantly, these data show that although cancer was considered a rare disease in the Alaska Native population as recently as the mid-twentieth century, the incidence rate for all cancers combined among Alaska Natives is now as high as that of US Whites, and even higher in women. On the other hand, despite relative differences in rates, the most frequently diagnosed cancers among Alaska Natives are the same as US Whites. Cancers of the lung, colon/rectum, breast, and prostate are most frequently diagnosed among Alaska Natives and in the U.S. These four cancers comprise over 50% of all diagnosed invasive cancers. Cancer of the lung is almost entirely preventable by eradication of tobacco use. Screening and early detection have been proven to reduce mortality for cancers of the colon/rectum and breast. Primary and secondary prevention of these cancers could markedly improve morbidity and mortality.

Clinical utility of the modified barium swallow.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the immediate and clinically relevant information gained from the modified barium swallow study and to determine the impact of the procedure on patient management. A database containing a nonrandom sample of 608 swallowing studies was reviewed. Results showed that only 10.4% of the studies were classified as normal examinations and aspiration occurred in 32.4%. However, swallowing abnormality without aspiration was recorded in 57.2% of the studies. Five additional outcome variables were assessed: referrals made to other specialties, effectiveness of applied compensatory strategies, treatment recommendations, mode of intake change, and diet grade change. Nearly 83% of the 608 studies showed change in at least one of the variables: needed referral to a specialist was identified on 26.3%; compensatory strategies that improved swallow physiology were identified on 48.4%; swallowing therapy was recommended on 37.2%; changes in mode of intake occurred on 31.4%; and diet texture changes were recommended on 43.8%. The low percentage of normal studies coupled with the high percentage of change in measurable variables indicate high clinical utility for the modified barium swallow study. The misguided tendency to refer to the modified barium study only as a tool for identifying aspiration and the appropriate utilization of the examination for identification of underlying abnormality in swallowing physiology are explained.

Critical thinking's role in perioperative patient safety outcomes.

Despite education, training, tools, and standards, patient safety issues continue to be of concern when it comes to perioperative care. The problem of intraoperative injuries, therefore, may lie in perioperative nurses' implementation of safety measures that require critical thinking. This qualitative study lends insight into the critical thinking or decision-making processes of nurses who implement these perioperative safety measures. Findings from this data analysis have led to perioperative recommendations that may enhance patient safety outcomes.