Impact of glyphosate formulations and adjuvants: effects on leaf interaction, metabolism, and control of sourgrass / Impacto das formulações de glifosato e dos adjuvantes: efeitos na interação foliar, no metabolismo e no controle do capim-amargoso

The addition of commercial formulations and adjuvants to a tank mix may result in differences in the wettability on the plant surface, foliar uptake and herbicide efficacy. Thus, the objectives of this study were to evaluate the influence of glyphosate formulations and tank-mixture adjuvants on the contact angle (CA), uptake, metabolism and sourgrass control and the damage to the cuticular microstructure of this species caused by herbicide solutions. For this purpose, assays were carried out in a completely randomized design, and treatments distributed in a 2x5+1 factorial scheme with five replications. Two glyphosate formulations isopropylamine salt (SL) and ammonium salt (WG) combined or not with the adjuvant methylated soybean oil (MSO), mineral oil (MO), ethoxylated alkyl ester (EAE) or polyoxyethylenealkylphenol ether (PAE); and one control (water) were evaluated. CA measurements of the droplets deposited on a sourgrass leaf surface and on the standard surface (parafilm) were obtained using a tensiometer. Herbicide uptake and shikimate accumulation were simultaneously determined by chromatography and spectrometry. The control effect was assessed by observing plant survival dry weight reductions. The glyphosate SL and WG formulations had similar effects on the variables analyzed. However, mixing the adjuvants EAE, MO or MSO with either formulation of herbicide led to greater wettability and more severe damage to the cuticular microstructure, favoring glyphosate uptake and shikimate accumulation. Despite evidence regarding the treatments containing oils/surfactants, the control effect on sourgrass was similar. The combination of glyphosate formulations with such adjuvants is potentially more effective and guarantees satisfactory sourgrass control.

Formulações comerciais e adjuvantes adicionados à mistura em tanque podem resultar em mudanças na superfície de molhamento, absorção foliar e eficácia dos herbicidas. Assim, objetivou-se com este trabalho avaliar a influência das formulações de glifosato e adjuvantes sobre o ângulo de contato (CA), absorção, metabolismo e controle do capim-amargoso, além de investigar os danos ocasionados pelas soluções herbicidas à microestrutura cuticular dessa espécie daninha. Para tanto, ensaios foram conduzidos em delineamento inteiramente casualizado, e os tratamentos distribuídos em esquema fatorial 2x5+1, com cinco repetições. Duas formulações de glifosato (SL e WG) combinadas ou não com os adjuvantes éster metílico de óleo de soja (MSO), óleo mineral (MO), alquil ester etoxilado (EAE) e polioxietilenoalquilfenoléter (PAE); e um controle (água) foram avaliados. As medidas de CA das gotas depositadas na superfície foliar de capim-amargoso e na superfície padrão (parafilme) foram obtidas usando um tensiômetro. A absorção do herbicida e o acúmulo de chiquimato foram determinados, simultaneamente, por cromatografia e espectrometria de massas. O efeito de controle foi avaliado pela observação da sobrevivência da planta e redução do peso seco. As formulações de glifosato SL e WG apresentaram efeitos similares sobre as variáveis analisadas. Contudo, os adjuvantes EAE, MO e MSO, quando em mistura ao herbicida, em ambas as formulações, destacaram-se por apresentar maior molhabilidade e danos mais severos à microestrutura cuticular, favorecendo a absorção do glifosato e acúmulo de chiquimato. Apesar das evidências sobre a bioeficácia dos tratamentos que continham óleos/surfactantes, o controle sobre capim-amargoso foi similar. A combinação das formulações de glifosato com tais adjuvantes são potencialmente mais eficazes e garantem controle satisfatório do capim-amargoso.

Carfentrazone-ethyl and glyphosate drift inhibits uredinial formation of Austropuccinia psidii on Eucalyptus grandis leaves.

BACKGROUND: The response to infection of Austropuccinia psidii in resistant (CLR-383) and susceptible (CLR-384) Eucalyptus grandis clones, exposed to herbicide drift of carfentrazone-ethyl, glyphosate and a mixture of these two herbicides, was evaluated at microscopic and physiological levels. RESULTS: Plants of the two clones showed symptoms of phytotoxicity caused by herbicide drift. However, net CO2 assimilation rate, height and shoot dry matter were lower in CLR-384 than in CLR-383. At the ultrastructure level, the leaves of both clones exposed to the herbicides showed thylakoid disorganization and accumulation of starch grains in the chloroplasts. Only plants of CLR-384 were infected by A. psidii, but when exposed to herbicide drift, rust severity was lower than in control plants. Six days after inoculation (dai), plants of this clone exposed to the herbicides had smaller uredinia than control plants. At 12 dai, non-herbicide treated plants showed normal uredinia, containing abundant urediniospores. By contrast, plants exposed to the herbicides were less colonized by the fungus, and the uredinia were smaller with reduced production of urediniospores, which were sometimes not even detected. CONCLUSION: Glyphosate and carfentrazone-ethyl herbicide drift reduce infection and uredinial formation of A. psidii and to some extent induce basal resistance in a susceptible clone of E. grandis. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry.