RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The differences in vascular risk factors' and stroke burden across Europe are notable, however there is limited understanding of the influence of socioeconomic environment on the quality of secondary prevention and outcome after acute ischemic stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this observational multicenter cohort study, we analyzed baseline characteristics, reperfusion treatment, outcome and secondary prevention in patients with acute ischemic stroke from three tertiary-care teaching hospitals with similar service population size in different socioeconomic environments: Bern/CH/n = 293 (high-income), Gdansk/PL/n = 140 (high-income), and Lutsk/UA/n = 188 (lower-middle-income). RESULTS: We analyzed 621 patients (43.2% women, median age = 71.4 years), admitted between 07 and 12/2019. Significant differences were observed in median BMI (CH = 26/PL = 27.7/UA = 27.8), stroke severity [(median NIHSS CH = 4(0-40)/PL = 11(0-33)/UA = 7(1-30)], initial neuroimaging (CT:CH = 21.6%/PL = 50.7%/UA = 71.3%), conservative treatment (CH = 34.1%/PL = 38.6%/UA = 95.2%) (each p < 0.001), in arterial hypertension (CH = 63.8%/PL = 72.6%/UA = 87.2%), atrial fibrillation (CH = 28.3%/PL = 41.4%/UA = 39.4%), hyperlipidemia (CH = 84.9%/PL = 76.4%/UA = 17%) (each p < 0.001) and active smoking (CH = 32.2%/PL = 27.3%/UA = 10.2%) (p < 0.007). Three-months favorable outcome (mRS = 0-2) was seen in CH = 63.1%/PL = 50%/UA = 59% (unadjusted-p = 0.01/adjusted-p CH-PL/CH-UA = 0.601/0.981), excellent outcome (mRS = 0-1) in CH = 48.5%/PL = 32.1%/UA = 27% (unadjusted-p < 0.001/adjusted-p CH-PL/CH-UA = 0.201/0.08 and adjusted-OR CH-UA = 2.09). Three-months mortality was similar between groups (CH = 17.2%/PL = 15.7%/UA = 4.8%) (unadjusted-p = 0.71/adjusted-p CH-PL/CH-UA = 0.087/0.24). Three-months recurrent stroke/TIA occurred in CH = 3.1%/PL = 10.7%/UA = 3.1%, adjusted-p/OR CH-PL = 0.04/0.32). Three-months follow-up medication intake rates were the same for antihypertensives. Statin/OAC intake was lowest in UA = 67.1%/25.5% (CH = 87.3%/39.2%/unadjusted-p < 0.001/adjusted-p CH-UA = 0.02/0.012/adjusted-OR CH-UA = 2.33/2.18). Oral intake of antidiabetics was lowest in CH = 10.8% (PL = 15.7%/UA = 16.1%/unadjusted-p = 0.245/adjusted-p CH-PL/CH-UA = 0.061/0.002/adjusted-OR CH-UA = 0.25). Smoking rates decreased in all groups during follow-up. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Substantial differences in presentation, treatment and secondary prevention measures, are linked to a twofold difference in adjusted 3-months excellent outcome between Switzerland and Ukraine. This underscores the importance of socioeconomic factors that influence stroke outcomes, emphasizing the necessity for targeted interventions to address disparities in treatment and secondary prevention strategies.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Uncertainty remains regarding antithrombotic treatment in cervical artery dissection. This analysis aimed to explore whether certain patient profiles influence the effects of different types of antithrombotic treatment. METHODS: This was a post hoc exploratory analysis based on the per-protocol dataset from TREAT-CAD (NCT02046460), a randomized controlled trial comparing aspirin to anticoagulation in patients with cervical artery dissection. We explored the potential effects of distinct patient profiles on outcomes in participants treated with either aspirin or anticoagulation. Profiles included (1) presenting with ischemia (no/yes), (2) occlusion of the dissected artery (no/yes), (3) early versus delayed treatment start (>median), and (4) intracranial extension of the dissection (no/yes). Outcomes included clinical (stroke, major hemorrhage, death) and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes (new ischemic or hemorrhagic brain lesions) and were assessed for each subgroup in separate logistic models without adjustment for multiple testing. RESULTS: All 173 (100%) per-protocol participants were eligible for the analyses. Participants without occlusion had decreased odds of events when treated with anticoagulation (odds ratio [OR] = 0.28, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.07-0.86). This effect was more pronounced in participants presenting with cerebral ischemia (n = 118; OR = 0.16, 95% CI = 0.04-0.55). In the latter, those with early treatment (OR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.07-0.85) or without intracranial extension of the dissection (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.11-0.97) had decreased odds of events when treated with anticoagulation. INTERPRETATION: Anticoagulation might be preferable in patients with cervical artery dissection presenting with ischemia and no occlusion or no intracranial extension of the dissection. These findings need confirmation. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:886-897.
Asunto(s)
Anticoagulantes , Aspirina , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/tratamiento farmacológico , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/complicaciones , Aspirina/uso terapéutico , Anticoagulantes/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Smoking is an established risk factor for stroke. However, several studies have reported a better outcome after stroke for patients who smoke. According to this "smoking paradox" hypothesis, smoking might promote less severe strokes, higher collateral scores, and smaller infarct cores. METHODS: In this retrospective study, we screened data of 2,980 acute ischemic stroke patients with MCA-M1 occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy. Patients were categorized according to smoking status (current, former, or never). We assessed univariate associations between clinical characteristics and smoking status. Subsequently, we used adjusted regression analysis to evaluate associations of smoking with stroke severity on admission (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS]; primary endpoint), infarct core volume, and collateral status (secondary endpoints). RESULTS: Out of 320 patients, 19.7% (n = 63) were current smokers and 18.8% (n = 60) were former smokers. Admission NIHSS, reperfusion success, and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 3-6 months were similar in all groups. Current smokers were younger, more often male and less likely to have atrial fibrillation compared to former and never smokers. In regression analyses, smoking status was neither associated with admission NIHSS (estimate 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.27-2.35, p = 0.557) nor with collateral status (estimate 0.79, 95% CI: 0.44-1.44, p = 0.447) or infarct core volume (estimate -0.69, 95% CI: -15.15-13.77, p = 0.925 for current vs. never smokers). CONCLUSION: We could not confirm the smoking paradox. Our results support the fact that smoking causes stroke at a younger age, highlighting the role of smoking as a modifiable vascular risk factor.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas , Isquemia Encefálica , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Masculino , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/etiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/complicaciones , Infarto/complicaciones , Fumar/efectos adversos , Fumar/epidemiología , Trombectomía/métodos , Isquemia Encefálica/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We aimed to assess the association of diabetes mellitus (DM) and admission hyperglycaemia (AH), respectively, and outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation treated with endovascular therapy (EVT) in daily clinical practice. METHODS: Consecutive EVT patients admitted to our stroke centre between February 2015 and April 2020 were included in this observational cohort study. Patients with versus without DM and with versus without AH (glucose ≥ 7.8 mmol/L) were compared. RESULTS: We included 1020 patients (48.9% women, median age = 73.1 years); 282 (27.6%) had DM, and 226 (22.2%) had AH. Patients with versus without DM less often showed successful reperfusion (odds ratio [OR]adjusted = 0.61, p = 0.023) and worse 3-month functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] = 0-2: 31.3% vs. 48%, ORadjusted = 0.59, p = 0.004; death: 38.9% vs. 24.1%, ORadjusted = 1.75, p = 0.002; mRS shift: padjusted < 0.0001; if moderate/good collaterals and mismatch, mRS = 0-2: ORadjusted = 0.52, p = 0.005; death: ORadjusted = 1.95, p = 0.005). If analysis was additionally adjusted for AH, only mRS shift was still significantly worse in patients with DM (padjusted = 0.012). Patients with versus without AH showed similar successful reperfusion rates and worse 3-month functional outcome (mRS = 0-2: 28.3% vs. 50.4%, ORadjusted = 0.52, p < 0.0001; death: 40.4% vs. 22.4%, ORadjusted = 1.80, p = 0.001; mRS shift: padjusted < 0.0001; if moderate/good collaterals and mismatch, mRS = 0-2: ORadjusted = 0.38, p < 0.0001; death: ORadjusted = 2.39, p < 0.0001). If analysis was additionally adjusted for DM, 3-month functional outcome remained significantly worse in patients with AH (mRS = 0-2: ORadjusted = 0.58, p = 0.004; death: ORadjusted = 1.57, p = 0.014; mRS shift: padjusted = 0.004). DM independently predicted recurrent/progressive in-hospital ischaemic stroke (OR = 1.71, p = 0.043) together with admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (OR = 0.95, p = 0.005), and AH independently predicted in-hospital symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage (OR = 2.21, p = 0.001). The association of admission continuous glucose levels and most outcome variables was (inversely) J-shaped. CONCLUSIONS: Hyperglycaemia more than DM was associated with worse 3-month outcome in the patients studied, more likely so in the case of moderate/good collaterals and mismatch in admission imaging.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Diabetes Mellitus , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Hiperglucemia , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Isquemia Encefálica/cirugía , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Femenino , Glucosa , Humanos , Hiperglucemia/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico/cirugía , Masculino , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/cirugía , Trombectomía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The Thrombolysis in Ischemic Stroke Patients (TRISP) collaboration was a concerted effort initiated in 2010 with the purpose to address relevant research questions about the effectiveness and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). The collaboration also aims to prospectively collect data on patients undergoing endovascular treatment (EVT) and hence the name of the collaboration was changed from TRISP to EVA-TRISP. The methodology of the former TRISP registry for patients treated with IVT has already been published. This paper focuses on describing the EVT part of the registry. PARTICIPANTS: All centres committed to collecting predefined variables on consecutive patients prospectively. We aim for accuracy and completeness of the data and to adapt local databases to investigate novel research questions. Herein, we introduce the methodology of a recently constructed academic investigator-initiated open collaboration EVT registry built as an extension of an existing IVT registry in patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). FINDINGS TO DATE: Currently, the EVA-TRISP network includes 20 stroke centres with considerable expertise in EVT and maintenance of high-quality hospital-based registries. Following several successful randomised controlled trials (RCTs), many important clinical questions remain unanswered in the (EVT) field and some of them will unlikely be investigated in future RCTs. Prospective registries with high-quality data on EVT-treated patients may help answering some of these unanswered issues, especially on safety and efficacy of EVT in specific patient subgroups. FUTURE PLANS: This collaborative effort aims at addressing clinically important questions on safety and efficacy of EVT in conditions not covered by RCTs. The TRISP registry generated substantial novel data supporting stroke physicians in their daily decision making considering IVT candidate patients. While providing observational data on EVT in daily clinical practice, our future findings may likewise be hypothesis generating for future research as well as for quality improvement (on EVT). The collaboration welcomes participation of further centres willing to fulfill the commitment and the outlined requirements.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Isquemia Encefálica/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Trombectomía , Terapia Trombolítica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Healthy diet in primary and secondary prevention of stroke Abstract. An unhealthy diet is one of the modifiable risk factors for stroke. The world population's diet is suboptimal. Healthy and nutritious food such as whole grain, vegetables, fruit and fish is not consumed enough, and unhealthy food such as sweetened beverages, processed meat and salty food takes up a higher proportion of the diet than recommended. We also see this imbalance in Switzerland. After a thorough literature review, we summarize the current findings about different diets and food groups affecting the risk of stroke. Generally, a diet low in salt and rich in potassium, vegetables, fruit, whole grains and unsaturated fats, moderate consumption of fish and low intake of meat is recommended to decrease the risk of stroke. The Mediterranean diet comprises all these aspects and was shown to reduce the stroke risk considerably. Generally, a high variety of food has more impact than supplementation of vitamins, minerals and micronutrients.
Asunto(s)
Dieta Saludable , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Animales , Dieta , Conducta Alimentaria , Humanos , Prevención Secundaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , SuizaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To investigate whether stroke aetiology affects outcome in patients with acute ischaemic stroke who undergo endovascular therapy. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed patients from the Bernese Stroke Centre Registry (January 2010-September 2018), with acute large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation due to cardioembolism or large-artery atherosclerosis, treated with endovascular therapy (±intravenous thrombolysis). RESULTS: The study included 850 patients (median age 77.4 years, 49.3% female, 80.1% with cardioembolism). Compared with those with large-artery atherosclerosis, patients with cardioembolism were older, more often female, and more likely to have a history of hypercholesterolaemia, atrial fibrillation, current smoking (each p < 0.0001) and higher median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores on admission (p = 0.030). They were more frequently treated with stent retrievers (p = 0.007), but the median number of stent retriever attempts was lower (p = 0.016) and fewer had permanent stent placements (p ⩽ 0.004). Univariable analysis showed that patients with cardioembolism had worse 3-month survival [72.7% versus 84%, odds ratio (OR) = 0.51; p = 0.004] and modified Rankin scale (mRS) score shift (p = 0.043) and higher rates of post-interventional heart failure (33.5% versus 18.5%, OR = 2.22; p < 0.0001), but better modified thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (mTICI) score shift (p = 0.025). Excellent (mRS = 0-1) 3-month outcome, successful reperfusion (mTICI = 2b-3), symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage and Updated Charlson Comorbidity Index were similar between groups. Propensity-matched analysis found no statistically significant difference in outcome between stroke aetiology groups. Stroke aetiology was not an independent predictor of favourable mRS score shift, but lower admission NIHSS score, younger age and independence pre-stroke were (each p < 0.0001). Stroke aetiology was not an independent predictor of heart failure, but older age, admission antithrombotics and dependence pre-stroke were (each ⩽0.027). Stroke aetiology was not an independent predictor of favourable mTICI score shift, but application of stent retriever and no permanent intracranial stent placement were (each ⩽0.044). CONCLUSION: We suggest prospective studies to further elucidate differences in reperfusion and outcome between patients with cardioembolism and large-artery atherosclerosis.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current demographic changes indicate that more people will be care-dependent due to increasing life expectancy. Little is known about impact of preexisting dependency on stroke outcome after endovascular treatment (EVT). METHODS: We compared prospectively collected baseline and outcome data of previously dependent vs. independent stroke patients (prestroke modified Rankin Scale score of 3-5 vs. 0-2) treated with EVT. Outcome measures were favorable 3-month outcome (mRS ≤ 3 for previously dependent and mRS ≤ 2 for independent patients, respectively), death and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS: Among 1247 patients, 84 (6.7%) were dependent before stroke. They were older (81 vs. 72 years of age), more often female (61.9% vs. 46%), had a higher stroke severity at baseline (NIHSS 18 vs. 15 points), more often history of previous stroke (32.9% vs. 9.1%) and more vascular risk factors than independent patients. Favorable outcome and mortality were to the disadvantage of independent patients (26.2% vs. 44.4% and 46.4% vs. 25.5%, respectively), whereas sICH was comparable in both cohorts (4.9% vs. 5%). However, preexisting dependency was not associated with clinical outcome and mortality after adjusting for outcome predictors (OR 1.076, 95% CI 0.612-1.891; p = 0.799 and OR 1.267, 95% CI 0.758-2.119; p = 0.367, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study underscores the need for careful selection of care-dependent stroke patients when considering EVT, given a less favorable outcome observed in this cohort. Nonetheless, EVT should not systematically be withheld in patients with preexisting disability, since prior dependency does not significantly influence outcome.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica , Procedimientos Endovasculares , Accidente Cerebrovascular Isquémico , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Primary Prevention of Acute Stroke Abstract. Strokes are frequent. Vascular risk factors are increasing the stroke risk. Most vascular risk factors are treatable. Their therapy is important in the primary prevention of stroke. According to the INTERSTROKE study, arterial hypertension, inactivity, overweight, dyslipidemia, smoking, unhealthy diet, cardiac pathologies such as major arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus, stress/depression and overconsumption of alcohol are the most important treatable vascular risk factors. In this article, we will also report on at present less well known treatable vascular risk factors such as sleep apnea, atheromatosis of the aortic arch and of arteries supplying the brain, migraine with aura and chronic inflammatory disorders and infections.
Asunto(s)
Hipertensión , Trastornos Migrañosos , Prevención Primaria , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Trastornos Migrañosos/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of dissected artery occlusion (DAO) on functional outcome and complications in patients with cervical artery dissection (CeAD). METHODS: We analyzed combined individual patient data from 3 multicenter cohorts of consecutive patients with CeAD (the Cervical Artery Dissection and Ischemic Stroke Patients [CADISP]-Plus consortium dataset). Patients with data on DAO and functional outcome were included. We compared patients with DAO to those without DAO. Primary outcome was favorable functional outcome (i.e., modified Rankin Scale [mRS] score 0-1) measured 3-6 months from baseline. Secondary outcomes included delayed cerebral ischemia, major hemorrhage, recurrent CeAD, and death. We performed univariate and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses and calculated odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI), with adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of 2,148 patients (median age 45 years [interquartile range (IQR) 38-52], 43.6% women), 728 (33.9%) had DAO. Patients with DAO more frequently presented with cerebral ischemia (84.6% vs 58.5%, p < 0.001). Patients with DAO were less likely to have favorable outcome when compared to patients without DAO (mRS 0-1: 59.6% vs 80.1%, p unadjusted < 0.001). After adjustment for age, sex, and initial stroke severity, DAO was independently associated with less favorable outcome (mRS 0-1: OR 0.65, CI 0.50-0.84, p = 0.001). Delayed cerebral ischemia occurred more frequently in patients with DAO than in patients without DAO (4.5% vs 2.9%, p = 0.059). CONCLUSION: DAO independently predicts less favorable functional outcome in patients with CeAD. Further research on vessel patency, collateral status and effects of revascularization therapies particularly in patients with DAO is warranted.
Asunto(s)
Disección Aórtica/patología , Enfermedades Arteriales Cerebrales/patología , Trastornos Cerebrovasculares/patología , Recuperación de la Función , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Simultaneous dissection of three or four cervical arteries rarely occurs. As a result, limited information is available on clinical characteristics, underlying causes, treatment, and outcome of these patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of individual patient data on triple and quadruple cervical artery dissection (CeAD). We included all cases for whom, at minimum, data on age, sex and affected cervical arteries were available. RESULTS: Out of 1396 publications identified in the initial search, 52 were included, with data available on 96 patients. Mean age was 42 years and 66% were women. 63% had triple CeAD. The most common manifestations were headache (69%), neck pain (44%), motor deficit (36%), and Horner syndrome (34%). 57% had an ischemic stroke, in the majority of these patients the stroke was confined to the vascular territory of a single artery. 83% were managed medically (antiplatelets or anticoagulants) and 11% underwent endovascular treatment. An underlying disease or triggering event was identified in 71%, most commonly trauma (35%, cervical manipulative therapy in 13%), infection (18%), fibromuscular dysplasia (16%), and hereditary connective tissue disorder (8%). In-hospital mortality was 1%. 80% of patients had a good functional outcome (mRS 0-1) at follow-up. Two recurrences (3%) were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Triple or quadruple CeAD mostly affected young women, and underlying disease or triggering event could be identified in more than two-thirds of patients. Less than two-thirds of triple or quadruple CeAD patients suffered ischemic stroke. Most patients were managed medically and the majority had a favorable outcome.
Asunto(s)
Estudios de Casos Únicos como Asunto , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/epidemiología , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/etiología , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/terapiaRESUMEN
Importance: Predicting the duration of poststroke dysphagia is important to guide therapeutic decisions. Guidelines recommend nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding if swallowing impairment persists for 7 days or longer and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) placement if dysphagia does not recover within 30 days, but, to our knowledge, a systematic prediction method does not exist. Objective: To develop and validate a prognostic model predicting swallowing recovery and the need for enteral tube feeding. Design, Setting, and Participants: We enrolled participants with consecutive admissions for acute ischemic stroke and initially severe dysphagia in a prospective single-center derivation (2011-2014) and a multicenter validation (July 2015-March 2018) cohort study in 5 tertiary stroke referral centers in Switzerland. Exposures: Severely impaired oral intake at admission (Functional Oral Intake Scale score <5). Main Outcomes and Measures: Recovery of oral intake (primary end point, Functional Oral Intake Scale ≥5) or return to prestroke diet (secondary end point) measured 7 (indication for NGT feeding) and 30 (indication for PEG feeding) days after stroke. Results: In total, 279 participants (131 women [47.0%]; median age, 77 years [interquartile range, 67-84 years]) were enrolled (153 [54.8%] in the derivation study; 126 [45.2%] in the validation cohort). Overall, 64% (95% CI, 59-71) participants failed to recover functional oral intake within 7 days and 30% (95% CI, 24-37) within 30 days. Prolonged swallowing recovery was independently associated with poor outcomes after stroke. The final prognostic model, the Predictive Swallowing Score, included 5 variables: age, stroke severity on admission, lesion location, initial risk of aspiration, and initial impairment of oral intake. Predictive Swallowing Score prediction estimates ranged from 5% (score, 0) to 96% (score, 10) for a persistent impairment of oral intake on day 7 and from 2% to 62% on day 30. Model performance in the validation cohort showed a discrimination (C statistic) of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.76-0.91; P < .001) for predicting the recovery of oral intake on day 7 and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.67-0.87; P < .001) on day 30, and a discrimination for a return to prestroke diet of 0.94 (day 7; 95% CI, 0.87-1.00; P < .001) and 0.71 (day 30; 95% CI, 0.61-0.82; P < .001). Calibration plots showed high agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance: The Predictive Swallowing Score, available as a smartphone application, is an easily applied prognostic instrument that reliably predicts swallowing recovery. It will support decision making for NGT or PEG insertion after ischemic stroke and is a step toward personalized medicine.
Asunto(s)
Isquemia Encefálica/terapia , Trastornos de Deglución/terapia , Nutrición Enteral/métodos , Recuperación de la Función , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Isquemia Encefálica/complicaciones , Isquemia Encefálica/fisiopatología , Estudios de Cohortes , Deglución , Trastornos de Deglución/etiología , Trastornos de Deglución/fisiopatología , Femenino , Gastrostomía/métodos , Humanos , Intubación Gastrointestinal/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Aplicaciones Móviles , Pronóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/fisiopatología , Suiza , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Oropharyngeal dysphagia is frequent in hospitalized post-stroke patients and is associated with increased mortality and comorbidities. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate the impact of dysphagia on Length of Hospital Stay (LOS) and costs. The hospital perspective was used to assess costs. METHODS: Hospital discharge databases comparing hospital stays for ischemic stroke associated with dysphagia vs stroke without dysphagia in France and Switzerland were analyzed. The French Medical Information System Program (PMSI) database analysis focused on 62'297 stays for stroke in the public sector. 6'037 hospital stays for stroke were analyzed from the Swiss OFS (Office fédéral de la statistique: Statistique des coûts par cas 2012) database. Diagnosis codes and listing of procedures were used to identify dysphagia in stroke patients. RESULTS: Patients with post-stroke dysphagia accounted for 8.4% of stroke hospital stays in Switzerland, which is consistent with recently reported prevalence of dysphagia at hospital discharge (Arnold et al, 2016). The French database analysis identified 4.2% stays with post-stroke dysphagia. We hypothesize that the difference between the Swiss and French datasets may be explained by the limitations of an analysis based on diagnosis and procedure coding. Patients with post-stroke dysphagia stayed longer at hospitals (LOS of 23.7 vs. 11.8 days in France and LOS of 14.9 vs. 8.9 days in Switzerland) compared with patients without post-stroke dysphagia. Post-stroke dysphagia was associated with about 3'000 and CHF14'000 cost increase in France and Switzerland respectively. DISCUSSION: In this study post-stroke dysphagia was associated with increased LOS and higher hospital costs. It is difficult to isolate the impact of dysphagia in patients with multiple symptoms and disabilities impacting rehabilitation and recovery. After adjusting for confounding factors by matching stays according to age, sex and stroke complications, post-stroke dysphagia association with increased LOS and higher hospital costs was found to be independent of sensory or motor complications. CONCLUSION: Post-stroke dysphagia is associated with increased length of hospital stay and higher hospital costs.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Deglución/economía , Costos de Hospital , Tiempo de Internación , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Trastornos de Deglución/complicaciones , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , SuizaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Knowledge about the localization and outcome of iatrogenic dissection (ID) during endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is limited. We aimed to determine the frequency, clinical aspects and morphology of ID in endovascular AIS treatment and to identify predictors of this complication. METHODS: Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) of ID carried out during endovascular treatment between January 2000 and March 2012 have been re-evaluated. The ID localization and morphology were analyzed and related to the interventional techniques. Baseline clinical and radiological findings, treatment modality and outcome were compared with patients without ID. RESULTS: Out of 866 patients 18 (2%) suffered an ID (44% female, median age 64 years). Localization was extracranial in 15 (83%, 14 internal carotid artery and 1 vertebral artery) and intracranial in 3 (17%; 1 vertebrobasilar dissection and 2 in the anterior circulation). Of the IDs 5 (28%) resulted in a high-degree, 3 (17%) in a moderate, 5 (28%) in a mild and 5 (28%) in no stenosis and 8 IDs were stented in the acute phase. At 3 months 7 (42%) patients had a favorable outcome (modified Rankin score mRS ≤ 2) and 6 (33%) patients had died. Patients with ID had a different stroke etiology (p = 0.041), were more likely to be smokers (44% versus 19%, p = 0.015) and were more likely to be treated with mechanical thrombectomy (100% versus 60%, p < 0.001). Although two ID patients had relevant complications, the outcome did not differ between the groups. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of ID is a rare complication of endovascular AIS treatment associated with smoking and mechanical thrombectomy.
Asunto(s)
Angiografía de Substracción Digital , Arteria Basilar/lesiones , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/diagnóstico por imagen , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Anciano , Arteria Basilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Traumatismos de las Arterias Carótidas/terapia , Angiografía por Tomografía Computarizada , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Enfermedad Iatrogénica , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Stents , Trombectomía/efectos adversos , Terapia Trombolítica/efectos adversos , Activador de Plasminógeno de Tipo Uroquinasa/uso terapéutico , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/terapia , Insuficiencia Vertebrobasilar/diagnóstico por imagen , Insuficiencia Vertebrobasilar/etiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess putative risk factors and outcome of multiple and early recurrent cervical artery dissection (CeAD). METHODS: We combined data from 2 multicenter cohorts and compared patients with multiple CeAD at initial diagnosis, early recurrent CeAD within 3 to 6 months, and single nonrecurrent CeAD. Putative risk factors, clinical characteristics, functional outcome, and risk of recurrent ischemic events were assessed. RESULTS: Of 1,958 patients with CeAD (mean ± SD age 44.3 ± 10 years, 43.9% women), 1,588 (81.1%) had single nonrecurrent CeAD, 340 (17.4%) had multiple CeAD, and 30 (1.5%) presented with single CeAD at admission and had early recurrent CeAD. Patients with multiple or early recurrent CeAD did not significantly differ with respect to putative risk factors, clinical presentation, and outcome. In multivariable analyses, patients with multiple or early recurrent CeAD more often had recent infection (odds ratio [OR] 1.81, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.53), vertebral artery dissection (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.34-2.46), family history of stroke (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.06-2.25), cervical pain (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.01-1.84), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.01-8.04) at initial presentation compared to patients with single nonrecurrent CeAD. Patients with multiple or early recurrent CeAD also had a higher incidence of cerebral ischemia (hazard ratio 2.77, 95% CI 1.49-5.14) at 3 to 6 months but no difference in functional outcome compared to patients with single nonrecurrent CeAD. CONCLUSION: Patients with multiple and early recurrent CeAD share similar risk factors, clinical characteristics, and functional outcome. Compared to patients with single nonrecurrent CeAD, they are more likely to have recurrent cerebral ischemia at 3 to 6 months, possibly reflecting an underlying transient vasculopathy.
Asunto(s)
Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/diagnóstico , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/terapia , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Cooperación Internacional , Modelos Logísticos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Proteínas Quinasas S6 Ribosómicas 90-kDa , Factores de Riesgo , Terapia Trombolítica/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Disección de la Arteria Vertebral/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Stroke in older age has reached epidemic proportions worldwide, and an increasing incidence has also been recognized in young adults and children. This chapter deals with stroke occurring in the cerebellum. Cerebellar stroke may present in a completely different way from common stroke syndromes in the anterior cerebral circulation. It can initially mimic benign vestibular neuritis and may later deteriorate into a life-threatening neurologic state. Posterior circulation stroke presents similarly in children and adults. However, the possibly mild symptoms and signs at onset are frequently overlooked by parents and also by healthcare professionals. We therefore aim to discuss the clinical presentation, treatment, causes, and prognosis of cerebellar stroke in both adults and children. Important differences between children and adults are discussed after each section.
Asunto(s)
Cerebelo/fisiopatología , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/patología , Neuronitis Vestibular/complicaciones , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Niño , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest a paradoxical association between smoking status and clinical outcome after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Little is known about relationship between smoking and stroke outcome after endovascular treatment (EVT). METHODS: We analyzed data of all stroke patients treated with EVT at the tertiary stroke centre of Berne between January 2005 and December 2015. Using uni- and multivariate modeling, we assessed whether smoking was independently associated with excellent clinical outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-1) and mortality at 3 months. In addition, we also measured the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and recanalization. RESULTS: Of 935 patients, 204 (21.8%) were smokers. They were younger (60.5 vs. 70.1 years of age, p<0.001), more often male (60.8% vs. 52.5%, p = 0.036), had less often from hypertension (56.4% vs. 69.6%, p<0.001) and were less often treated with antithrombotics (35.3% vs. 47.7%, p = 0.004) as compared to nonsmokers. In univariate analyses, smokers had higher rates of excellent clinical outcome (39.1% vs. 23.1%, p<0.001) and arterial recanalization (85.6% vs. 79.4%, p = 0.048), whereas mortality was lower (15.6% vs. 25%, p = 0.006) and frequency of sICH similar (4.4% vs. 4.1%, p = 0.86). After correcting for confounders, smoking still independently predicted excellent clinical outcome (OR 1.758, 95% CI 1.206-2.562; p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Smoking in stroke patients may be a predictor of excellent clinical outcome after EVT. However, these data must not be misinterpreted as beneficial effect of smoking due to the observational study design. In view of deleterious effects of cigarette smoking on cardiovascular health, cessation of smoking should still be strongly recommended for stroke prevention.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Endovasculares , Fumar/efectos adversos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The impact of smoking on prognosis after stroke is controversial. We aimed to assess the relationship between smoking status and stroke outcome after intravenous thrombolysis in a large cohort study by adjusting for potential confounders and incorporating recanalization rates. METHODS: In a prospective observational multicenter study, we analyzed baseline and outcome data of consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Using uni- and multivariable modeling, we assessed whether smoking was associated with favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-1) and mortality. In addition, we also measured the occurrence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and recanalization of middle cerebral artery. Patients reporting active cigarette use were classified as smokers. RESULTS: Of 1865 patients, 19.8% were smokers (n=369). They were younger (mean 63.5 versus 71.3 years), less often women (56% versus 72.1%), and suffered less often from hypertension (61.3% versus 70.1%) and atrial fibrillation (22.7% versus 35.6%) when compared with nonsmokers. Favorable outcome and 3-month mortality were in favor of smokers in unadjusted analyses (45.8% versus 39.5% and 9.3% versus 15.8%, respectively), whereas symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was comparable in both cohorts. Smoking was not associated with clinical outcome and mortality after adjusting for confounders (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-1.61; P=0.197 and odds ratio, 1.08; 95% confidence interval, 0.68-1.71; P=0.755, respectively). However, smoking still independently predicted recanalization of middle cerebral artery in multivariable analyses (odds ratio, 2.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-6.43; P=0.028). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that good outcome in smokers is mainly related to differences in baseline characteristics and not to biological effects of smoking. The higher recanalization rates in smokers, however, call for further studies.
Asunto(s)
Fibrinolíticos/uso terapéutico , Fumar/epidemiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Fibrilación Atrial/epidemiología , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de las Arterias Carótidas/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/epidemiología , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media/tratamiento farmacológico , Infarto de la Arteria Cerebral Media/epidemiología , Hemorragias Intracraneales/inducido químicamente , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Arteria Cerebral Media , Análisis Multivariante , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Prospectivos , Reperfusión , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Suiza/epidemiología , Terapia Trombolítica , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/prevención & control , Disfunción Cognitiva/prevención & control , Rehabilitación/métodos , Rehabilitación/tendencias , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , Accidente Cerebrovascular/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/prevención & control , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/etiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Differential diagnosis of elevated high sensitive Troponin T (hsTnT) in acute ischemic stroke includes myocardial infarction (MI) and neurogenic stunned myocardium (NSM). The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with baseline hsTnT levels and MI or NSM in acute ischemic stroke. METHODS: We studied 204 consecutive patients of the prospective acquired Bern Stroke Database with acute ischemic stroke diagnosed by brain MR. All patient histories and cardiac examinations were reviewed retrospectively. Volumetry of lesions on diffusion and perfusion weighted brain imaging (circular singular value decomposition, Tmax >6sec) was performed. Voxel based analysis was performed to identify brain areas associated with hsTnT elevation. Linear regression analysis was used to identify predictors of baseline hsTnT levels and myocardial infarction. RESULTS: Elevated hsTnT was observed in 58 of the 204 patients (28.4%). The mean age was 68.3 years in the normal hsTnT group and 69.7 years in the elevated hsTnT group. Creatinine (p<0.001, OR 6.735, 95% CI 58.734-107.423), baseline NIHSS score (p = 0.029, OR 2.207, 95% CI 0.675-12.096), ST segment depression (p = 0.025, OR 2.259, 95% CI 2.419-35.838), and negative T waves in baseline ECG (p = 0.002, OR 3.209, 95% CI 13.007-54.564) were associated with hsTnT elevation, while infarct location and size were not. Coronary angiography was performed in 30 of the 204 patients (14.7%) and myocardial infarction was diagnosed in 7 of them (23.3%). Predictive factors for myocardial infarction could not be identified. CONCLUSION: Elevated baseline baseline hsTnT was associated with NIHSS, creatinine, ST segment depression and inverted T waves, but not with stroke location or size. None of the factors was helpful to differentiate MI and NSM. Therefore, ancillary investigations such as coronary angiography, cardiac MRI or both may be needed to solve the differential diagnosis.