Phase I trial of the matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor BAY12-9566 in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PURPOSE: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are a family of proteolytic enzymes that are believed to be involved in primary and metastatic tumor growth by degrading the basement membrane and changing the extracellular matrix to facilitate invasion of malignant cells and angiogenesis. Overexpression of MMPs has been documented in various solid tumors. BAY12-9566 is a selective inhibitor of MMPs, in particular MMP-2, -3. and -9. The purpose of this trial was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), safety profile, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of orally administered BAY12-9566 in patients with incurable solid tumors. METHODS: The starting dose of BAY12-9566 for this single institution, outpatient phase I study was 100 mg/day orally. Patients were allowed to receive drug for up to 12 months. A total of 27 patients with various solid malignancies including colorectal, breast, lung, cervical and ovarian cancers were enrolled at doses from 100 to 1,600 mg/day. Patients were evaluated weekly while on treatment. Relevant radiologic examination was performed every 8 weeks to document and follow sites of measurable or evaluable disease. RESULTS: Toxicities from BAY12-9566 included liver injury test abnormalities, anemia, shoulder and back pain. thrombocytopenia, mild nausea and fatigue, diarrhea, rash and deep vein thrombosis. No toxicity greater than grade III was observed. As doses were increased from 100 to 400 to 1,600 mg/day, even in divided doses, less than proportional increases in AUC were observed. At the highest dose level of 1600 mg/day, the day 29 AUC (3778.00 mg x h/l) remained similar to the day 29 AUC (3312.60 mg x h/l) at the dose level of 1200 mg/day. No responses were seen, but 14 patients remained on study with stable disease for 4 to 26 months. CONCLUSIONS: BAY12-9566 was well tolerated at doses as high as 800 mg orally twice daily. Although mild alterations in liver injury tests, platelet count and hematocrit were noted, these were not dose-limiting. The drug was well absorbed. However, the absence of proportional increases in AUC with doses greater than 800 mg and the achievement of Css in the range associated with biologic activity in preclinical models led to the selection of 800 mg twice daily for further evaluation in phase III trials.

A prospective pharmacologic evaluation of age-related toxicity of adjuvant chemotherapy in women with breast cancer.

Despite increasing evidence of benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy, older women with breast cancer are commonly given less aggressive treatment than younger patients. Conflicting prior data regarding age-related toxicity prompted this prospective study. Forty-four women (aged 35-79 years) with early-stage breast cancer were treated with four cycles of adjuvant therapy with doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 i.v. and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 i.v. every 21 days. They were monitored for myelosuppression, cardiotoxicity, and decrease in quality of life. Pharmacokinetics were analyzed using cycle 1 plasma samples. Bone marrow granulocyte and macrophage colony-forming units (CFU-GM) were assayed in vitro for dose response to 4-hydroperoxycyclophosphamide and doxorubicin before cycle 1. There was moderate evidence of age-related decrease in nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) when age was viewed as a continuous variable. On average there was a 10/microliter drop in cycle 1 nadir ANC for every year increase in age (p = 0.02). However, when age was viewed as a categorical variable (age < 65 vs. > or = 65 years), a similar proportion of women in each group reached an ANC < 100 (18% vs. 19%). Neither neutropenic complications, alteration in cardiac function, nor change in quality of life scores were significantly age related (p > 0.12). Pharmacokinetic analyses did not demonstrate age-related differences in the clearance of either doxorubicin or cyclophosphamide (p > 0.8). Pharmacodynamic analysis of individual patient bone marrow progenitor cell sensitivity did not reveal any correlation with age (p > 0.48). In women undergoing adjuvant therapy for breast cancer, no clinically significant age-related trends in toxicity were observed. These data suggest that older age alone should not exclude patients from receiving adjuvant therapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral fluorouracil on a chronic daily schedule in combination with the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inactivator eniluracil.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of oral fluorouracil (5-FU) administered twice daily in combination with oral eniluracil, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, administered for 28 days every 35 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oral 5-FU 1.35 mg/m(2) twice daily was administered with oral eniluracil 10 mg daily for 14 to 28 days, followed by a 1-week rest period. Eniluracil was started 1 day before 5-FU. Patients then received escalated doses of oral 5-FU 1. 35 to 1.8 mg/m(2) twice daily with an increased dose of eniluracil 10 mg twice daily for 28 days. A reduced dose of 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) with eniluracil 20 mg twice daily was evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with solid malignancies were enrolled onto the study. Diarrhea was the principal dose-limiting toxicity of oral 5-FU and eniluracil given on this chronic schedule. The recommended phase II dose is 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) twice daily with eniluracil 20 mg twice daily. Mean (SD) values for terminal half-life, apparent volume of distribution, and systemic clearance of 4.5 hours (0.83 hours), 19 L/m(2) (3.0 L/m(2)), and 51 mL/min/m(2) (13 mL/min/m(2)), respectively. An average of 77% of 5-FU was excreted unchanged in urine after 28 days of treatment. The mean (range) 5-FU C(SS,min) values achieved at the 1.0 mg/m(2) dose level were 22 ng/mL (8 to 38 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: Chronic oral administration of 5-FU with oral eniluracil is tolerable and produces 5-FU steady-state concentrations similar to those achieved with protracted intravenous administration of 5-FU on clinically relevant dose schedules. Eniluracil provides an attractive means of administering 5-FU on protracted schedules.

Niche segregation among sympatric Amazonian teiid lizards.

We examined standard niche axes (time, place, and food) for three sympatric teiid lizards in the Amazon rain forest. Activity times during the day were similar among species. Ameiva ameiva were in more open microhabitats and had higher body temperatures compared with the two species of Kentropyx. Microhabitat overlaps were low and not significantly different from simulations based on Monte Carlo analysis. Grasshoppers, crickets, and spiders were important in the diets of all three species and many relatively abundant prey were infrequently eaten (e.g., ants). Dietary overlaps were most similar between the two species of Kentropyx even though microhabitat overlaps were relatively low. A Monte Carlo analysis on prey types revealed that dietary overlaps were higher at all ranks than simulated overlaps indicating that use of prey is not random. Although prey size was correlated with lizard body size, there were no species differences in adjusted prey size. A. ameiva ate more prey items at a given body size than either species of Kentropyx. Body size varies among species, with A. ameiva being the largest and K. altamazonica the smallest. The two species of Kentropyx are most distant morphologically, with A. ameiva intermediate. The most distant species morphologically are the most similar in terms of prey types. A morphological analysis including 15 species from four genera revealed patterns of covariation that reflected phylogenetic affinities (i.e., taxonomic patterns are evident). A cluster analysis revealed that A. ameiva, K. pelviceps, and K. altamazonica were in the same morphological group and that within that group, A. ameiva differed from the rest of the species. In addition, K. pelviceps and K. altamazonica were distinguishable from other species of Kentropyx based on morphology.

Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of 14C-temozolomide following oral administration to patients with advanced cancer.

The purpose of this study is to characterize the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of carbon 14-labeled temozolomide (14C-TMZ) administered p.o. to adult patients with advanced solid malignancies. On day 1 of cycle 1, six patients received a single oral 200-mg dose of 14C-TMZ (70.2 microCi). Whole blood, plasma, urine, and feces were collected from days 1-8 and on day 14 of cycle 1. Total radioactivity was measured in all samples. TMZ, 5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC), and 4-amino-5-imidazole-carboxamide (AIC) concentrations were determined in plasma, and urine and plasma samples were profiled for metabolite/degradation products. Maximum TMZ plasma concentrations were achieved between 0.33 to 2 h (mean, 1.2 h), and half-life, apparent volume of distribution, and oral clearance values averaged 1.9 h, 17 liters/m2, and 104 ml/min/m2, respectively. A first-order absorption, one-compartment linear model, which included first-order formation of MTIC from TMZ and elimination of MTIC via degradation to AIC, and a peripheral distribution compartment for AIC, adequately described the plasma TMZ, MTIC, and AIC concentrations. MTIC systemic clearance was estimated to be 5384 ml/min/m2, and the half-life was calculated to be 2.5 min. Metabolite profiles of plasma at 1 and 4 h after treatment showed that 14C-derived radioactivity was primarily associated with TMZ, and a smaller amount was attributed to AIC. Profiles of urine samples from 0-24 h revealed that 14C-TMZ-derived urinary radioactivity was primarily associated with unchanged drug (5.6%), AIC (12%), or 3-methyl-2,3-dihydro-4-oxoimidazo[5,1-d]tetrazine-8-carboxyl ic acid (2.3%). The recovered radioactive dose (39%) was principally eliminated in the urine (38%), and a small amount (0.8%) was excreted in the feces. TMZ exhibits rapid oral absorption and high systemic availability. The primary elimination pathway for TMZ is by pH-dependent degradation to MTIC and further degradation to AIC. Incomplete recovery of radioactivity may be explained by the incorporation of AIC into nucleic acids.

A phase I and pharmacologic study of DMP 840 administered by 24-hour infusion.

PURPOSE: DMP 840, a novel bisnaphthalimide, has demonstrated promising schedule dependent anti-tumor activity in vitro and in vivo against several tumor cell lines. A phase I study was conducted to evaluate the effect of a 24-hour infusion schedule repeated every three weeks, on the therapeutic efficacy of DMP 840. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with refractory solid tumor malignancies were treated with DMP 840 at doses of 20, 40, 50 and 60 mg/m2. RESULTS: A combination of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia and stomatitis were dose-limiting at doses of 50 and 60 mg/m2 in both minimally- and extensively-pretreated patients. In contrast, all courses at lower dose levels were well tolerated. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated that DMP 840 had a prolonged terminal half life (median 39 hours; range 25-86) and that dose-limiting events were significantly related to several indices of systemic DMP 840 exposure (P < 0.01, Wilcoxon Rank Sum test). CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of DMP 840 for further disease oriented evaluations is 40 mg/m2 administered over 24 hours every three weeks. The infusion duration evaluated in this study did not result in a substantial increase in the tolerable dose compared to shorter, less cumbersome schedules.

Sequence-dependent hematological toxicity associated with the 3-hour paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide doublet.

Paclitaxel is active in metastatic breast cancer. Combination studies have demonstrated complex interactions between paclitaxel and other cytotoxic agents, including sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicological, and pharmacological effects. The principal objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated doses of paclitaxel (3-h infusion) and cyclophosphamide (1-h infusion) administered every 3 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Filgrastim) and to determine if the sequence-dependent toxicological effects that have previously been observed with this combination when paclitaxel was administered over 24 h were evident when paclitaxel was administered over 3 h. Fifteen women with metastatic breast cancer were treated. Starting doses were 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 1600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5 micrograms/kg/day) given s.c. beginning 24 h after chemotherapy. Doses of both drugs were escalated in cohorts of at least four patients. The sequence of drug administration was alternated with each consecutive patient and with each subsequent course of therapy in each individual patient, enabling the evaluation of sequence-dependent toxicological and pharmacological effects. Severe myelosuppression was the principal dose-limiting toxicity for this regimen, precluding dose escalation above 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 1600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, the maximum tolerated dose for this combination on this schedule. As has been previously demonstrated with this combination, when paclitaxel is administered over 24 h, the hematopoietic toxicity was sequence dependent. Paired analysis of toxicity data using each patient as her own control indicated more severe hematological toxicity in courses in which paclitaxel was administered first. There was no evidence of sequence-dependent effects on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs that might account for this phenomenon. The impact of drug sequencing on toxicity should be considered in the further development of combination therapy containing alkylating agents and paclitaxel, when the latter is administered over 3 h.

Phase I and pharmacological study of CI-980, a novel synthetic antimicrotubule agent.

CI-980 (NSC 613862) is one of a novel class of 1,2-dihydropyrido[3, 4-b]pyrazines that inhibits tubulin polymerization, presumably by binding to the colchicine binding site of tubulin. In a Phase I and pharmacological study, 16 patients with advanced solid neoplasms were treated with CI-980 on a continuous 72-h infusion schedule at doses ranging from 3.0-5.4 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks. High rates of central nervous system (CNS) toxicity and neutropenia occurred in both minimally and heavily pretreated patients who were treated with CI-980 doses above 3.75 mg/m2/day, which is the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose for additional evaluations. CNS effects, characterized by neurocortical, mood, and cerebellar manifestations, were generally observed toward the end of the infusion and immediately posttreatment and usually resolved within 48 h after the completion of treatment. Toxicity was mild to modest at the 3.75 mg/m2/day dose level. Neither clinical nor pharmacological risk factors that may predispose patients to the development of CNS effects were evident. Although no objective antineoplastic activity was observed in this Phase I study, CI-980 steady-state plasma concentrations achieved at the recommended dose of 3.75 mg/m2/day (mean +/- SE, 5.74 +/- 0.54 nM) approached and exceeded concentrations that have been associated with significant activity in preclinical studies, indicating that additional disease-directed evaluations of CI-980 may be warranted.

Phase I study of paclitaxel on a 3-hour schedule followed by carboplatin in untreated patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

This study sought to determine the principal toxicities and feasibility of administering paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion followed by carboplatin without and with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and to recommend doses for subsequent clinical trials. Twenty-three patients were treated with paclitaxel at doses ranging from 175 to 225 mg/m2 followed by carboplatin targeting area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) 7 or 9 mg/mL.min every 3 weeks. AUCs were targeted using the Calvert formula with estimated creatinine clearance as a surrogate for the glomerular filtration rate. A high rate of intolerable, mutually exclusive toxicities, consisting primarily of thrombocytopenia, as well as neutropenia, nausea and vomiting, and mucositis, precluded escalation of carboplatin above a targeted AUC of 7 mg/mL.min with paclitaxel 225 mg/m2, which approaches the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of paclitaxel given as a single agent on a 3-hour schedule. Moderate to severe peripheral neurotoxicity occurred in several patients after multiple courses. Due to the heterogeneous nature of the principal toxicities and the ability to administer clinically-relevant doses of both agents in combination without G-CSF, further dose escalation using G-CSF was not performed. Nine of 23 (39%) total patients and 43% of 21 assessable patients had partial responses (PR). The recommended doses for subsequent clinical trials are paclitaxel 225 mg/m2 as a 3-hour infusion followed by carboplatin at a targeted AUC of 7 mg/mL.min. The ability to administer clinically-relevant single agent doses of paclitaxel and carboplatin in combination, as well as the significant antitumor activity noted in this phase I trial, indicate that further evaluations of this regimen in both advanced and early stage NSCLC are warranted.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with impaired renal function.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and recommended doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, in patients with varying degrees of renal excretory dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with normal renal function [creatinine clearance (CrCl) > or = 60 mL/min] and 28 patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction were treated with topotecan 0.4 to 2.0 mg/m2/d as a 30-minute infusion for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Plasma and urine samples were obtained to determine the disposition of topotecan. RESULTS: In patients with mild renal dysfunction (CrCl = 40 to 59 mL/min), dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed in three of eight patients receiving topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d and in two of five patients receiving topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d. In patients with moderate renal dysfunction (CrCl = 20 to 39 mL/min), dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed in three of eight patients who received topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d, and in two of four patients receiving topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d; these events were more frequently observed in extensively pretreated patients. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed significant correlations between CrCl and the plasma clearance of both total topotecan [Spearman's correlation coefficient (r2) = 0.65, P = .00001] and topotecan lactone (r2 = 0.65, P = .00003). Mean systemic plasma clearance of total topotecan was significantly reduced in patients with mild (P = .04) and moderate (P = .00006) renal dysfunction. There was no evidence of changes in the pharmacodynamic relationship between topotecan exposure (AUC) and myelotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Dose adjustments are required in patients with moderate, but not mild, renal impairment. For patients with moderate renal dysfunction, the recommended starting dose of topotecan is 0.75 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 3 weeks. Moreover, extensively pretreated patients need further dose reductions.

Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence.

PURPOSE: A phase I and pharmacologic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of administering the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors. The study was designed to evaluate the magnitude of the toxicologic and pharmacologic differences between the two sequences of drug administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days and CDDP was given either before TPT on day 1 or after TPT on day 5. Each patient was treated with both schedules on an alternating basis every 3 weeks. Sequential dose escalation of TPT or CDDP resulted in three dosage permutation of TPT/CDDP (mg/m2): 0.75/50, 1/50, and 0.75/75. After the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) level was achieved, the feasibility of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was studied. To examine the interaction of TPT and CDDP in vitro, human A549 lung cancer cells were exposed to these agents concurrently and sequentially. RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia resulted after the doses of TPT or CDDP were increased to greater than 0.75 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, without and with G-CSF. The sequence of CDDP before TPT induced significantly worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than the alternate sequence. In vitro studies failed to provide any evidence for the differences in the cytotoxicity of these two sequences. Instead, pharmacokinetic studies suggested that the differences in toxicity were due, in part, to lower TPT clearance and exposure when CDDP preceeds TPT, possibly due to subclinical renal tubular toxicity induced by CDDP. CONCLUSION: The sequence of CDDP before TPT at doses of 50 and 0.75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for subsequent clinical trials in tumor types in which both agents have significant single-agent activity. The potential for sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicologic, and pharmacologic effects should be evaluated in concurrent clinical and laboratory studies in the course of developing combination chemotherapy regimens that consist of topo I-targeting agents and other antineoplastic agents, particularly DNA-damaging agents.

Pharmacokinetic, oral bioavailability, and safety study of fluorouracil in patients treated with 776C85, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.

PURPOSE: To study the absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of an oral solution of fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients treated with 776C85, an oral inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and to evaluate the feasibility of administering oral 5-FU and 776C85 on a multiple-daily dosing schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled onto this three-period study. In periods 1 and 2, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 5-FU 10 mg/m2 on day 2 given by either the oral or intravenous (IV) route with oral 776C85 3.7 mg/m2/d on days 1 and 2. In period 3, patients received escalating doses of 5-FU (10 to 25 mg/ m2/d) orally for 5 days (days 2 to 6) with 776C85 3.7 mg/m2/d orally (days 1 to 7) every 4 weeks. Pharmaco-kinetic studies were performed in periods 1 and 2, and after the fifth oral dose of 5-FU in period 3. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic studies. Following oral 5-FU 10 mg/m2, the bioavailability was 122% +/- 40% (mean +/- SD), the terminal half-life (t1/2 beta) was 4.5 +/- 1.6 hours, the apparent volume of distribution (V beta) was 21.4 +/- 5.9 L/ m2, and the systemic clearance (Clsys) was 57.6 +/- 16.4 mL/min/m2. A correlation was observed between oral 5-FU systemic clearance and calculated creatinine clearance (r = .74; P = .009). Multiple-daily dosing did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of oral 5-FU. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity of oral 5-FU and 776C85, precluding escalation of oral 5-FU to doses greater than 25 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 4 weeks with 776C85. CONCLUSION: The oral DPD inactivator 776C85 enables oral administration of 5-FU and may alter conventional 5-FU administration practices.

A phase I and pharmacological study of topotecan infused over 30 minutes for five days in patients with refractory acute leukemia.

The principal objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of escalating doses of the hydrophilic topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) as a 30-min infusion daily for 5 days in adults with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia and to study the pharmacokinetic behavior of high doses of TPT and pharmacodynamic determinants of TPT activity. Fourteen patients received 27 courses of TPT at doses ranging from 3.5 to 5.75 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks. A constellation of unusual adverse effects, consisting of high fever, rigors, precipitous anemia, and hyperbilirubinemia, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity of high doses of TPT on this schedule. These toxicities were consistently intolerable at the 5.75 mg/m2/day dose level; however, they were neither severe nor common at lower doses. Although the precise etiology of these effects is not known, high doses of TPT may induce acute hemolytic reactions in this patient population. Severe, albeit transient, mucositis was experienced by two of eight patients in 2 of 17 courses at the next lower dose level, 4.5 mg/m2/day, which was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose and the dose recommended for further trials. The pharmacokinetic behavior of TPT at high doses was not dose dependent and resembled that at lower doses. In view of preclinical data suggesting that TPT sensitivity might correlate with topo I levels, topo I content in leukemia blasts was assessed by Western blotting. Variations in topo I content were observed. Moreover, strong correlations were evident between topo I content and two markers of proliferation, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and nuclear protein B23, raising the possibility that differences in topo I content observed among various leukemia specimens might reflect differences in the proliferating fractions of cells in various leukemia samples. Although complete clearance of circulating leukemia blasts occurred in most courses, neither sustained responses nor hematopoietic recovery were observed in the heavily pretreated, poor-risk patients enrolled in this study, and it was not possible to correlate these differences in topo I content with clinical response. These results indicate that substantial dose escalation of TPT as a 30-minute infusion for a 5-day schedule above myelosuppressive doses is feasible in adults with refractory or relapsed leukemias; however, further development of alternate high-dose schedules in leukemia may be warranted in view of the nature of the dose-limiting toxicity and the lack of sustained clinical responses in this preliminary investigation.

Phase I and pharmacologic studies of topotecan in patients with impaired hepatic function.

BACKGROUND: Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has demonstrated anticancer activity toward leukemias and solid tumors in clinical trials, is eliminated via hepatic and renal routes. However, dosing guidelines for the administration of topotecan to patients with impaired hepatic function have not yet been established. PURPOSE: We compared the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), the toxic effects, and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan in patients who had refractory, malignant, solid tumors and who either had or lacked hepatic injury. The potential role of three substrate markers of liver function (indocyanin green [ICG]-- a marker of hepatic blood flow; lorazepam--a substrate marker of hepatic glucuronidation; and antipyrine--a substrate marker for cytochrome P450 activity) in optimizing topotecan doses for patients with liver injury was also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-one cancer patients, 14 of whom had hepatic injury due to metastatic disease, biliary obstruction, or cirrhosis, were treated with intravenously delivered courses of topotecan consisting of 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg/m2 of drug per day for 5 days. Most patients received more than one course of treatment, with new courses initiated at 3-week intervals. Patient responses (evaluated by tumor measurements) and treatment-induced toxic effects were assessed. Prior to the initiation of topotecan treatment, patients were given intravenous injections of ICG, lorazepam, and antipyrine to determine the plasma pharmacokinetics of these compounds. The pharmacokinetics of topotecan (both the lactone and the carboxylate forms) were determined by analysis of plasma and urine samples collected on the first day of the first course of drug treatment. Scatter plots of area under the plasma concentration versus time curves in relation to percent decreases in either absolute neutrophil count or platelet count were used to explore the pharmacodynamics of topotecan. The Student's t test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between patients with and without abnormal hepatic function. Correlations were assessed using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs). Reported P values are based on two-tailed tests of significance. RESULTS: Patients with hepatic injury tolerated topotecan doses up to 1.5 mg/m2, i.e., the MTD of this drug established in previous studies. The nature and severity of treatment-induced toxic effects and the pharmacokinetics of topotecan were similar in patients with and without liver injury. No differences were observed in the urinary excretion of topotecan between the two patient groups. Clearances of total topotecan and its lactone species correlated only with clearance of ICG (rs = .64, P = .004; and rs = .68, P = .0017, respectively). The pharmacodynamic effects of topotecan were not altered by liver dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Cancer patients with hepatic injury can be treated with topotecan at a starting dose of 1.5 mg/m2, given daily for 5 days and administered every 3 weeks. Topotecan dose modifications do not appear to be required for patients with hepatic dysfunction and normal renal function.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of escalating doses of the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors and to study whether G-CSF scheduling variably affects the ability to escalate TPT doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients received 121 courses of TPT as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks at doses that ranged from 2.0 to 4.2 mg/m2/d. G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) was initiated concurrently with TPT (starting on day 1). Because the concurrent administration of TPT and G-CSF resulted in severe myelosuppression at the lowest TPT dose level, an alternate posttreatment G-CSF schedule in which G-CSF dosing began after TPT (starting on day 6) was subsequently evaluated. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT and to determine whether G-CSF altered the pharmacokinetic profile of TPT. RESULTS: Severe myelosuppression precluded the administration of TPT at the first dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d, with G-CSF on the concurrent schedule. However, dose escalation of TPT with G-CSF on a posttreatment schedule proceeded to 4.2 mg/m2/d. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. One partial response was noted in a patient with colorectal carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidines. Pharmacokinetics were linear within the dosing range of 2.0 to 3.5 mg/m2/d, but TPT clearance was lower at the 4.2-mg/m2/d dose level. At 3.5 mg/m2/d, which is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for subsequent-phase studies of TPT with G-CSF, the area under the concentration-versus-time curves (AUCs) for total TPT and lactone averaged 2.2- and 2.3-fold higher, respectively, than the AUCs achieved at the lowest TPT dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d. The pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT was not significantly altered by the scheduling of G-CSF. CONCLUSION: G-CSF administered after 5 daily 30-minute infusions of TPT permits a 2.3-fold dose escalation of TPT above the MTD in solid-tumor patients, whereas concurrent therapy with G-CSF and TPT results in severe myelosuppression.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of sequences of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in women with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Pacltaxel is active in metastatic breast cancer, but limited information is available on combinations of this agent with other cytotoxic agents. Study aims were to determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of paclitaxel (24-hour infusion) and cyclophosphamide (1-hour infusion) administered every 21 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) to determine the effect of drug sequence on toxicity and pharmacology and to evaluate the activity of this combination in women with anthracycline-resistant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven women with metastatic breast cancer were treated. Starting doses were paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, with filgrastim 5 microG/kg/d subcutaneously beginning 24 hours after chemotherapy. Four patients were treated at each dose level. The sequence of drug administration was alternated between sequential patients, and with subsequent courses of therapy in each patient, to enable evaluation of effects of drug sequence on toxicity and pharmacology. Patients were treated every 21 days and disease status was reevaluated every two courses. RESULTS: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1,250 mg/m2 is the MTD for this combination on this schedule. The hematopoietic toxicity of therapy was sequence-dependent. Paired analysis of toxicity data indicated more severe toxicity in courses in which paclitaxel was administered first. Sequence-dependent pharmacologic effects did not account for this phenomenon. Responses were noted in 29% of patients with anthracycline-resistant disease. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1,250 mg/m2 with filgrastim administered every 21 days are the doses recommended for further study.

The effects of food and divided dosing on the bioavailability of oral vinorelbine.

The effects of food and divided dosing on the bioavailability of a liquid-filled gelatin capsule formulation of vinorelbine (Navelbine), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid with broad clinical activity, was evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors. A group of 13 patients were randomized to treatment with the oral formulation at the recommended phase II dose of 80 mg/m2 per week either in the fasting state or after ingestion of a standard meal. Patients were treated 1 week later in the alternate state relative to their first dose. The effects of divided dosing were assessed during the 3rd week, at which time vinorelbine was administered in two divided doses. After the completion of pharmacokinetic and bioavailability studies, patients received the oral formulation at a dose of 80 mg/m2 per week in two divided doses to evaluate the feasibility of chronic oral drug administration. Both manipulations resulted in small, albeit statistically significant, reductions in the relative bioavailability of this oral formulation. The relative bioavailability decreased by 22 +/- 28% when treatment followed the ingestion of a standard meal, possibly due to a delay in gastrointestinal transit time. The mean time of maximum plasma concentration (Tmax) increased from 1.3 +/- 1.6 h in the fasting state to 2.5 +/- 1.6 h in the fed state, although this difference was not statistically significant. Similarly, the relative bioavailability declined by 16 +/- 51% when vinorelbine was administered in two divided doses. An analysis of dose proportionality revealed disproportionate increases in dose-normalized Cmax and AUC values with single oral doses above 120 mg, which may account for this phenomenon. The high clearance of vinorelbine, which approaches hepatic blood flow, and the lack of dose proportionality after oral administration, indicate that there is a large first-pass effect which may be saturable, or nonlinear, above single doses of 120 mg. In addition, the toxicological and pharmacological characteristics of oral vinorelbine indicate that treatment after a standard meal or on a divided dosing schedule is safe. Chronic oral administration of the agent in two divided doses was also well tolerated. However, the small reduction in the relative bioavailability following the ingestion of a standard meal and with divided dosing suggest the need for further pharmacodynamic studies to determine if reductions in drug exposure of this magnitude may portend diminished antitumor activity.

Phase I study of paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion followed by carboplatin in untreated patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Preliminary results of a phase I study of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), given by 3-hour infusion, followed by carboplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer indicate that both agents can be combined at clinically relevant single-agent doses. The paclitaxel (mg/m2)/carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve (mg.min/mL) dose level of 225/7 is projected to be the maximally tolerated and recommended phase II dose level for future evaluations. Dose-limiting neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea and vomiting preclude treatment with carboplatin doses estimated to target an area under the concentration-time curve of 9 mg.min/mL when given with paclitaxel 225 mg/m2. The heterogeneous nature of the principal toxicities, as well as the ability to administer clinically relevant single-agent doses of both agents in combination, also indicate that further dose escalation of paclitaxel and carboplatin using hematopoietic growth factors would not be feasible. The preliminary antitumor activity noted to data, as well as the safety associated with the clinically relevant single-agent doses that can be given in combination, indicate that phase II/III evaluations of this regimen are warranted in patients with both advanced and early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

Pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and feasibility study of oral vinorelbine in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The feasibility of administering vinorelbine (Navelbine, Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid with broad activity, as a liquid-filled gelatin capsule was evaluated in a bioavailability (F) and pharmacokinetic study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Each of 17 cancer patients had pharmacokinetic studies performed after receiving vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 intravenously (IV), which is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) for weekly IV administration, and twice after receiving the oral formulation at a nominal dose of 100 mg/m2. Subsequently, these patients and 10 other subjects received the oral formulation at a dose of 100 mg/m2/wk to evaluate the feasibility of chronic oral administration. RESULTS: Plasma drug disposition was well described by a triphasic model. Mean central volume of distribution and steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) were large (0.66 +/- 0.46 L/kg and 20.02 +/- 8.55 L/kg, respectively); the mean harmonic terminal half-life (t1/2) was long (18 hours); and the high mean clearance (CI) rate (0.80 +/- 0.68 L/h/kg) approached hepatic blood flow. F was low (0.27 +/- 12), and absorption was rapid (mean time of maximum plasma concentration [Tmax], 0.91 +/- 0.22 hours). Absorption parameters after the first and second oral doses were similar, with mean F values of 0.27 +/- 0.14 and 0.25 +/- 0.11, respectively. Coefficients of variability (CVs) for F, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and Tmax were 32%, 42%, and 78%, respectively, indicating moderate intraindividual variability. The pharmacologic profile of this oral formulation indicates that there is a large first-pass effect. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity of oral vinorelbine. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 63% of patients, but only 11% developed neutropenia and infection. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were also common with oral administration, but these effects were rarely severe and could be ameliorated by using a divided-dose schedule and/or prophylactic antiemetic and antidiarrheal agents. The mean nominal oral dose was 82 mg/m2, and the mean percentage of intended dose that was received was 92%. Although dose escalations were permitted for negligible toxicity, doses were not escalated to greater than 100 mg/m2/wk in any patient. Vinorelbine given as a liquid-filled gelatin capsule at 100 mg/m2 provided equivalent pharmacologic exposure as 30 mg/m2 IV. CONCLUSION: The oral administration of vinorelbine, specifically as a liquid-filled, soft gelatin capsule, is a feasible route of administration. Weekly oral dosing at 100 mg/m2 induces a consistent degree of myelosuppression, but the high frequency of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, albeit brief and uncomplicated, warrants the recommendation of a slightly lower starting dose, ie, 80 mg/m2/d, for subsequent phase II evaluations, especially in heavily pretreated patients.