Association Between Copayment and Adherence to Medications for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Background Pharmacologic treatment for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) improves exercise capacity, functional class, and hemodynamic indexes. However, monthly prescription costs often exceed $4000. We examined associations between (1) medication copayment and (2) annual household income with adherence to pulmonary vasodilator therapy among individuals with PAH. Methods and Results We used administrative claims data from an insured population in the United States to identify individuals diagnosed with PAH between 2015 and 2020. All individuals had ≥1 medication claim for endothelin receptor antagonists, phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitors, prostanoids or prostacyclin receptor agonists, or the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat. We defined copayments as low, medium, or high, as determined by their distributions for each medication class. Annual household income was categorized as <$40 000, $40 000 to $74 999, and ≥$75 000. The primary outcome was medication adherence, defined by proportion of days covered ≥80%. We studied 4025 adults (aged 65.9±13.3 years; 71.2% women). Compared with those with annual household income ≥$75 000, individuals in the <$40 000 and $40 000 to $74 999 categories had no significant differences in medication adherence. Compared with those with low copayments, individuals with high copayments had decreased adherence to prostanoids (odds ratio [OR], 0.36 [95% CI, 0.20-0.65]; P<0.001) and combination therapy with endothelin receptor antagonist and phosphodiesterase type-5 inhibitor (OR, 0.61 [95% CI, 0.38-0.97]; P=0.03). Conclusions We identified associations between copayment and adherence to prostanoids and combination therapy among individuals with PAH. Copayment may be a structural barrier to medication adherence and merits inclusion in studies examining access to pharmacotherapy among individuals with PAH.

Neighbourhood disadvantage impacts on pulmonary function in patients with sarcoidosis.

Background: This multicentre, international, prospective cohort study evaluated whether patients with pulmonary sarcoidosis living in neighbourhoods with greater material and social disadvantage experience worse clinical outcomes. Methods: The area deprivation index and the Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation evaluate neighbourhood-level disadvantage in the US and Canada, with higher scores reflecting greater disadvantage. Multivariable linear regression evaluated associations of disadvantage with baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) or diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (D LCO) and linear mixed effects models for associations with rate of FVC or D LCO decline, and competing hazards models were used for survival analyses in the US cohort, evaluating competing outcomes of death or lung transplantation. Adjustments were made for age at diagnosis, sex, race and smoking history. Results: We included 477 US and 122 Canadian patients with sarcoidosis. Higher disadvantage was not associated with survival or baseline FVC. The highest disadvantage quartile was associated with lower baseline D LCO in the US cohort (ß = -6.80, 95% CI -13.16 to -0.44, p=0.04), with similar findings in the Canadian cohort (ß = -7.47, 95% CI -20.28 to 5.33, p=0.25); with more rapid decline in FVC and D LCO in the US cohort (FVC ß = -0.40, 95% CI -0.70 to -0.11, p=0.007; D LCO ß = -0.59, 95% CI -0.95 to -0.23, p=0.001); and with more rapid FVC decline in the Canadian cohort (FVC ß = -0.80, 95% CI -1.37 to -0.24, p=0.003). Conclusion: Patients with sarcoidosis living in high disadvantage neighbourhoods experience worse baseline lung function and more rapid lung function decline, highlighting the need for better understanding of how neighbourhood-level factors impact individual patient outcomes.

Association between income and likelihood of right heart catheterization in individuals with pulmonary hypertension: A US claims database analysis.

We used a US-based administrative claims database to determine associations between annual household income and the likelihood of right heart catheterization (RHC) among individuals with pulmonary hypertension. Those with annual household income < $40,000 were 19% less likely to receive RHC compared to individuals with annual household income ≥ $100,000 (p < 0.0001).

Improved hospitalization rates in a specialty center for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and pulmonary hypertension.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction can be complicated by pulmonary hypertension. We designed a retrospective study to provide supporting evidence for referral to specialty care centers. Specialty care centers improved hospitalizations but not mortality-in part due to more aggressive medication management and guideline-directed monitoring.

Neighborhood-Level Disadvantage Impacts on Patients with Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease.

Rationale: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (fILD) is a group of pathologic entities characterized by scarring of the lungs and high morbidity and mortality. Research investigating how socioeconomic and residential factors impact outcomes in patients with fILD is lacking. Objectives: To determine the association between neighborhood-level disadvantage and presentation severity, disease progression, lung transplantation, and mortality in patients with fILD from the United States and Canada. Methods: We performed a multicenter, international, prospective cohort study of 4,729 patients with fILD from one U.S. and eight Canadian ILD registry sites. Neighborhood-level disadvantage was measured by the area deprivation index in the United States and the Canadian Index of Multiple Deprivation in Canada. Measurements and Main Results: In the U.S. but not in the Canadian cohort, patients with fILD living in neighborhoods with the greatest disadvantage (top quartile) experience the highest risk of mortality (hazard ratio = 1.51, P = 0.002), and in subgroups of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the top quartile of disadvantage experienced the lowest odds of lung transplantation (odds ratio = 0.46, P = 0.04). Greater disadvantage was associated with reduced baseline DLCO in both cohorts, but it was not associated with baseline FVC or FVC or DLCO decline in either cohort. Conclusions: Patients with fILD who live in areas with greater neighborhood-level disadvantage in the United States experience higher mortality, and patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis experience lower odds of lung transplantation. These disparities are not seen in Canadian patients, which may indicate differences in access to care between the United States and Canada.