Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) ; 99: 105756, 2022 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36063742

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Arthroplasty with artificial disc replacement for surgical treatment of cervical spine degeneration was introduced with the notion that motion-preserving approaches would prevent development of adjacent segment disease. Though clinical outcomes favor arthroplasty over the commonly used anterior cervical discectomy with fusion approach, clinical studies confirming the biomechanical basis of these results are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare intervertebral kinematics between arthroplasty and fusion patients 6.5 years post-surgery during physiological motion of the neck. METHODS: Using a biplane dynamic X-ray system, computed tomography imaging and model based tracking algorithms, three dimensional intervertebral kinematics were measured during neck axial rotation and extension in 14 patients treated for cervical radiculopathy with fusion (n = 8) or arthroplasty (n = 6). The measurements were performed at 2-year (baseline) and 6.5 year post-surgical time points, with the main interest being in the interaction between surgery types and time points. 3 translations and 3 rotations were investigated for the index (C5C6), and upper- (C4C5) and lower adjacent levels (C6C7). FINDINGS: Surgery-time interaction was significant for axial rotation (P < 0.04) and flexion-extension rotation (P < 0.005) in C4C5 during neck axial rotation, left-right translation (P < 0.04) in C5C6 and anterior-posterior translation in C6C7 (P < 0.04) during neck extension. In contrast with the expectations, axial rotation and flexion-extension decreased in C4C5 during neck rotation and anterior-posterior translation decreased in C6C7 during neck extension for fusion. INTERPRETATION: The findings do not support the notion that adjacent segment motion increases after fusion.


Asunto(s)
Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral , Disco Intervertebral , Fusión Vertebral , Reeemplazo Total de Disco , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/fisiología , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Discectomía/métodos , Humanos , Disco Intervertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Reeemplazo Total de Disco/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0237350, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32780779

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in foraminal motion at two time points post-surgery between artificial disc replacement (ADR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). METHODS: Eight ACDF and 6 ADR patients (all single-level C5-6) were tested at 2 years (T1) and 6.5 years (T2) post-surgery. The minimum foraminal height (FH.Min) and width (FW.Min) achieved during neck axial rotation and extension, and the range of these dimensions during motion (FH.Rn and FW.Rn, respectively) were measured using a biplane dynamic x-ray system, CT imaging and model-based tracking while patients performed neck axial rotation and extension tasks. Two-way mixed ANOVA was employed for analysis. RESULTS: In neck extension, significant interactions were found between year post-surgery and type of surgery for FW.Rn at C5-6 (p<0.006) and C6-7 (p<0.005), and for FH.Rn at C6-7 (p<0.01). Post-hoc analysis indicated decreases over time in FW.Rn for ACDF (p<0.01) and increases in FH.Rn for ADR (p<0.03) at the C6-7 adjacent level. At index level, FW.Rn was comparable between ACDF and ADR at T1, but was smaller for ACDF than for ADR at T2 (p<0.002). In axial rotation, differences were found between T1 and T2 but did not depend on type of surgery (p>0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Changes were observed in the range of foraminal geometry at adjacent levels from 2 years to 6.5 years post-surgery that were different between ACDF and ADR for neck extension. These changes are contrary to the notion that motion at adjacent levels continue to increase following ACDF as compared to ADR over the long term.


Asunto(s)
Vértebras Cervicales/fisiopatología , Discectomía/efectos adversos , Degeneración del Disco Intervertebral/cirugía , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Fusión Vertebral/efectos adversos , Reeemplazo Total de Disco/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Vértebras Cervicales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vértebras Cervicales/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Reeemplazo Total de Disco/instrumentación , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...