Prenatal diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease associated with lower postpartum depressive symptoms: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVE: When the expectant mother is faced with an unforeseen event during pregnancy, she may experience emotional fragility and depression. This study was carried out to test the association between the time of diagnosis of critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) and depressive symptoms in puerperal women. METHOD: A case-control study. All mothers answered a semi-structured questionnaire and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Pearson's correlation and multiple linear regression analysis were used to determine factors associated with depression. RESULTS: 50 puerperal women, 23 cases and 27 controls. The proportion of puerperal depressive symptoms was 26.1 % among mothers of infants prenatally diagnosed with CCHD and 77.8 % among mothers of infants postnatally diagnosed (p = 0.001 [OR] 9.917; 95 % CI 2.703-36.379). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that the use of psychotropic drugs and time of diagnosis were significantly associated with puerperal depressive symptoms. CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis of CCHD was associated with significantly lower levels of depressive symptoms.

Treating periodontal disease in patients with myocardial infarction: A randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Periodontitis has been associated with coronary artery disease, but the impact of a periodontal treatment on the endothelial function of patients with a recent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) was not investigated. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial (NCT02543502). Patients admitted between August 2012 and January 2015 were included. Patients were screened during the index hospitalization for STEMI, and those with severe periodontal disease were randomized 2 weeks later to periodontal treatment or to control. The primary endpoint of this trial was the between group difference in the variation of flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) in the brachial artery assessed by ultrasound from baseline to the 6-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were cardiovascular events, adverse effects of periodontal treatment and inflammatory markers. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were balanced between patients in the intervention (n = 24) and control groups (n = 24). There was a significant FMD improvement in the intervention group (3.05%; p = .01), but not in the control group (-0.29%; p = .79) (p = .03 for the intergroup comparison). Periodontal treatment was not associated with any adverse events and the inflammatory profile and cardiovascular events were not significantly different between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of periodontal disease improves the endothelial function of patients with a recent myocardial infarction, without adverse clinical events. Larger trials are needed to assess the benefit of periodontal treatment on clinical outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02543502 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02543502?term=NCT02543502&rank=1).

Psychological characteristics of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions.

BACKGROUND: There is few data evaluating the prevalence and influence of adverse psychological characteristics on the prognosis of individuals submitted to percutaneous coronary interventions. No study has addressed this issue in Brazil. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of depression, anxiety, psychological stress, and Type D personality and its association with cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: Psychological characteristics were evaluated by scales: Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Lipp Inventory for Stress Symptoms for Adults and Type D Personality Scale. The end-point of this study was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events in one-year follow-up. RESULTS: During March and May 2006, 137 patients were included. Type D personality was identified in 34% of the cases, 29% presented anxiety, 25% presented depression and 70% of the patients presented stress. In relation to the frequency of psychological characteristics according to the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, there was no statistical difference between both groups of patients regarding depression (29% vs. 26% p = 0.8), anxiety (33% vs. 23% p = 0.3), stress (76% vs. 65% p = 0.3), and Type D personality (33% vs. 32% p = 0.9). However, the negative affectivity score was significantly higher in the group of patients presenting events (13.9 vs. 9.8 p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients submitted to percutaneous coronary interventions, the prevalence of adverse psychological characteristics was high. One-year major cardiovascular adverse events were associated with baseline negative affectivity, but not with the other psychological characteristics studied.

Características psicológicas dos pacientes submetidos à intervenção coronária percutânea / Psychological characteristics of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions

FUNDAMENTO: Há poucos dados sobre análises da prevalência e da influência de características psicológicas adversas no prognóstico dos indivíduos submetidos a intervenções coronárias percutâneas. Nenhum estudo abordou essa questão no Brasil. OBJETIVO: Investigar a prevalência de depressão, ansiedade, estresse psicológico e personalidade tipo D, bem como sua associação com eventos cardiovasculares em pacientes submetidos à intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP). MÉTODOS: As características psicológicas foram avaliadas por escalas: inventário de depressão de Beck (IDB), inventário de ansiedade de Beck (IAB), inventário de sintomas de estresse de Lipp para adultos (ISSL) e escala de personalidade tipo D. A meta do estudo foi a ocorrência de eventos cardiovasculares maiores em um seguimento de um ano. RESULTADOS: Durante março e maio de 2006, 137 pacientes foram incluídos. A personalidade tipo D foi identificada em 34 por cento dos casos; 29 por cento apresentaram ansiedade, 25 por cento apresentaram depressão, e 70 por cento dos pacientes apresentaram estresse. Em relação à frequência de características psicológicas de acordo com a ocorrência de eventos cardiovasculares adversos maiores, não houve diferença estatística entre os dois grupos de pacientes no que se refere à depressão (29 por cento vs. 26 por cento p = 0,8), ansiedade (33 por cento vs. 23 por cento p = 0,3), estresse (76 por cento vs. 65 por cento p = 0,3) e personalidade tipo D (33 por cento vs. 32 por cento p = 0,9). No entanto, encontrou-se um escore de afetividade negativa significativamente maior no grupo de pacientes que apresentaram eventos (13,9 vs. 9,8 p = 0,01). CONCLUSÃO: Em pacientes submetidos à intervenção coronária percutânea, a prevalência de efeitos adversos psicológicos característicos foi alta. Eventos adversos cardiovasculares maiores em um ano foram associados à afetividade negativa basal, mas não a outras características psicológicas estudadas.

BACKGROUND: There is few data evaluating the prevalence and influence of adverse psychological characteristics on the prognosis of individuals submitted to percutaneous coronary interventions. No study has addressed this issue in Brazil. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of depression, anxiety, psychological stress, and Type D personality and its association with cardiovascular events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS: Psychological characteristics were evaluated by scales: Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Lipp Inventory for Stress Symptoms for Adults and Type D Personality Scale. The end-point of this study was the occurrence of major cardiovascular events in one-year follow-up. RESULTS: During March and May 2006, 137 patients were included. Type D personality was identified in 34 percent of the cases, 29 percent presented anxiety, 25 percent presented depression and 70 percent of the patients presented stress. In relation to the frequency of psychological characteristics according to the occurrence of major adverse cardiovascular events, there was no statistical difference between both groups of patients regarding depression (29 percent vs. 26 percent p = 0.8), anxiety (33 percent vs. 23 percent p = 0.3), stress (76 percent vs. 65 percent p = 0.3), and Type D personality (33 percent vs. 32 percent p = 0.9). However, the negative affectivity score was significantly higher in the group of patients presenting events (13.9 vs. 9.8 p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: In patients submitted to percutaneous coronary interventions, the prevalence of adverse psychological characteristics was high. One-year major cardiovascular adverse events were associated with baseline negative affectivity, but not with the other psychological characteristics studied.