F-18 FDG perfusion PET: intraprocedural assessment of the liver tumor ablation margin.

PURPOSE: To evaluate 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) perfusion PET during FDG PET/CT-guided liver tumor microwave ablation procedures for assessing the ablation margin and correlating minimum margin measurements with local progression. METHODS: This IRB-approved, HIPAA-compliant study included 20 adult patients (11 M, 9 F; mean age 65) undergoing FDG PET/CT-guided liver microwave ablation to treat 31 FDG-avid tumors. Intraprocedural FDG perfusion PET was performed to assess the ablation margin. Intraprocedural decisions regarding overlapping ablations were recorded. Two readers retrospectively interpreted intraprocedural perfusion PET and postprocedural contrast-enhanced MRI. Assessability of the ablation margin and minimum margin measurements were recorded. Imaging follow-up for local progression ranged from 30 to 574 days (mean 310). Regression modeling of minimum margin measurements was performed. Hazard ratios were calculated to correlate an ablation margin threshold of 5 mm with outcomes. RESULTS: Intraprocedural perfusion PET prompted additional overlapping ablations of two tumors, neither of which progressed. Incomplete ablation or local progression occurred in 8/31 (26%) tumors. With repeat ablation, secondary efficacy was 26 (84%) of 31. Both study readers deemed ablation margins fully assessable more often using perfusion PET than MRI (OR 69.7; CI 6.0, 806.6; p = 0.001). Minimum ablation margins ≥ 5 mm on perfusion PET correlated with a low risk of incomplete ablation/local progression by both study readers (HR 0.08 and 0.02, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Intraprocedural FDG perfusion PET consistently enabled complete liver tumor microwave ablation margin assessments, and the perfusion PET minimum ablation margin measurements correlated well with local outcomes. Clinical trial registration clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02018107).

Liver Tumor Ablation Procedure Duration and Estimated Patient Radiation Dose: Comparing Positron Emission Tomography/CT and CT Guidance.

PURPOSE: To compare procedure duration and patient radiation dose in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and CT-guided liver tumor ablation procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective, case-control study, 275 patients underwent 368 image-guided ablation procedures to treat 537 tumors. Radiologists used PET/CT guidance for 117 procedures and CT guidance for 251 procedures. PET/CT-guided procedures were performed by one radiologist (C: P.B.S.). All 3 radiologists (A: J.G.S., B: a radiologist who is not an author on this article, and C: P.B.S.) performed CT-guided procedures. Potential confounders included patient demographics, clinical and tumor characteristics, and procedural variables. RESULTS: The mean duration and estimated patient radiation dose of PET/CT-guided procedures performed by radiologist C were 21.5 ± 4.9 minutes longer and 0.7 ± 2.8 mSv higher than CT-guided procedures performed by all radiologists in an unadjusted comparison. Adjusting for confounding, mean duration and estimated dose of PET/CT-guided procedures performed by radiologist C were 28.3 ± 3.8 minutes longer (P < .0001) and 6.2 ± 2.9 mSv higher (P = .03) than CT-guided procedures performed by the same radiologist. Comparing CT-guided procedures performed by all 3 radiologists, adjusted mean durations and estimated patient doses of procedures by the least experienced radiologist, radiologist A, and the second most experienced radiologist, radiologist B, were 24.2 ± 5.1 (P < .0001) and 18.1 ± 8.9 (P = .04) minutes longer and 13.1 ± 3.7 (P < .001) and 14.5 ± 6.4 (P = .02) mSv higher, respectively, than procedures performed by the most experienced radiologist, radiologist C. CONCLUSIONS: PET/CT-guided liver ablations had a slightly longer duration with slightly higher estimated patient radiation dose than similar CT-guided liver ablations. Procedure duration and patient dose do not appear to be major impediments to the emerging field of PET/CT-guided tumor ablation.