RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recurrent patellar dislocation in combination with cartilage injures are difficult injuries to treat with confounding pathways of treatment. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of patients operated for patellofemoral instability with and without cartilage defects. METHODS: Eighty-two patients (mean age 28.8 years) with recurrent patellar dislocations, who underwent soft-tissue or bony procedures, were divided into two matched groups (age, sex, follow up and type of procedure) of 41 each, based on the presence or absence of cartilage defects in patella. Chondroplasty, microfracture, osteochondral fixation or autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC)-type procedures were performed depending on the nature of cartilage injury. Lysholm, Kujala, Tegner and Subjective Knee scores of both groups were compared and analysed. Complications and return to surgery were noted. RESULTS: With a mean follow up of 8 years, there was a significant improvement observed in all the mean postoperative patient-reported outcome measures of both groups, as compared with the preoperative scores (P < 0.05). Comparing the two groups, postoperative Lysholm, Kujala and Subjective knee scores were significantly higher in patients operated without cartilage defects (P < 0.05). Three patients operated for patellofemoral instability with cartilage defects underwent patellofemoral replacement subsequently. The odds ratio for developing complications was 2.53 for patients operated with cartilage defects. CONCLUSION: Although there is a significant improvement in the long-term outcome scores of patients operated for recurrent patellar dislocation with cartilage defects, the results are significantly inferior compared with those without cartilage defects, along with a higher risk of developing complications and returning to surgery.