Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Vet Parasitol ; 210(1-2): 64-8, 2015 May 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25801226

RESUMEN

A clinical field investigation was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 10% imidacloprid/2.5% moxidectin for the treatment of ear mites (Otodectes cynotis) in dogs. The study was a multi-centered, blinded, positive controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted under field conditions with privately owned pets. A total of 17 veterinary clinics enrolled cases for the study. An otoscopic examination was performed to confirm the presence of O. cynotis residing in the ear of the dog prior to enrollment. A single-dog household was enrolled in the study if the dog had 5 or more ear mites and an acceptable physical examination. A multi-dog household was eligible if at least one dog in the household had 5 or more mites and all dogs in the household had acceptable physical exams and met the inclusion criteria. Qualified households were randomly assigned to treatments to receive either 10% imidacloprid+2.5% moxidectin topical solution or topical selamectin solution (positive control product) according to a pre-designated enrollment ratio of 2:1, respectively. If more than one dog in a multiple dog household had adequate numbers of ear mites, one dog was randomly selected to represent the household for efficacy evaluation prior to treatment. Treatments were administered twice per label and dose banding directions for each product approximately 28 days apart (Days 0 and 28), by the dog's owner at the study site. All dogs in a household were treated on the same day and with the same product. The owners completed a post-treatment observation form one day after each treatment. Post-treatment otoscopic examinations were performed by the investigators or attending veterinarian on Days 28 and 56. Physical examinations were performed on Days 0 and 56. One hundred and four (104) households were evaluated for efficacy on SD 28, and 102 households were evaluated for efficacy on SD 56. The dogs' ages ranged from 2 months to 16 years. A total of 247 dogs were evaluated for safety. Percent efficacy was based on the percentage of dogs cleared of ear mites. Mite clearance on Day 28 was 71% for the imidacloprid+moxidectin group and 69% for the selamectin group. Mite clearance on Day 56 was 82% for the imidacloprid+moxidectin group and 74% for the selamectin group. No serious adverse events associated with either product were observed during the study. The study demonstrated that 10% imidacloprid+2.5% moxidectin applied using two topical treatments, 28 days apart, was safe and achieved similar efficacy against O. cynotis as selamectin treatments applied and evaluated under the same conditions.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Perros/parasitología , Enfermedades del Oído/veterinaria , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Infestaciones por Ácaros/veterinaria , Nitrocompuestos/uso terapéutico , Animales , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Perros , Combinación de Medicamentos , Enfermedades del Oído/parasitología , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Insecticidas/administración & dosificación , Insecticidas/uso terapéutico , Ivermectina/análogos & derivados , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Macrólidos/administración & dosificación , Neonicotinoides , Nitrocompuestos/administración & dosificación
2.
Vet Parasitol ; 158(3): 164-70, 2008 Dec 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18926638

RESUMEN

The safety of heartworm preventives in heartworm-positive cats has traditionally been evaluated using adult Dirofilaria immitis removed from infected dogs and surgically implanted into the cats. An alternate study model uses infective larvae to establish adult infections in cats. Unfortunately, the number of adult worms resulting from the latter method varies widely from none to more than 30, both unacceptable for studies of natural heartworm infection and for studies evaluating product safety in heartworm-infected cats. We sought to determine infection severity in experimental infections via echocardiography to reduce the chances of enrolling uninfected and heavily infected cats into a study. Eighty adult cats were each inoculated with 60 infective D. immitis larvae and maintained for 8 months to allow for the development of adult worms. Antigen and antibody testing, as well as echocardiographic imaging, were performed to confirm and estimate adult worm burdens. Approximately 8 and 12 months post-infection, echocardiographic examination was performed to confirm and enumerate adult D. immitis populations in the cardiovascular system. Worm burdens were stratified as 0, 1-3, 4-11, and > 11 adults, with 0 being considered uninfected and more than 11 considered too heavily infected to be relevant for anthelmintic studies. Cats with clinically relevant infections (1-10 adults) subsequently received multiple treatments with the investigational drug, and worm burdens were confirmed by necropsy 30 days following the final treatment. Worm burden estimated with echocardiography correlated well, but not precisely, with post-mortem counts (p < 0.001, r2 = 0.67). Echocardiography under-, over-, and exactly estimated heartworm burden 53%, 27%, and 22% of the time, respectively. Although the correct category (0-4) was determined by echocardiography in only 54% of cats, positive cats were distinguished from negative cats 88% of the time and the heaviest infections (> 11) were correctly categorized 95% of the time. Both false negative and false positive results were observed. We conclude that echocardiography is useful for detecting mature experimental heartworm infections, identifying cats that have rejected mature infection, and detecting very heavy heartworm burdens, but it is only moderately accurate in classifying lesser burdens. While echocardiography cannot be relied upon to consistently determine the exact heartworm burden in experimentally infected cats, it is useful in stratifying worm burdens for anthelmintic safety studies.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos/diagnóstico por imagen , Dirofilaria immitis/aislamiento & purificación , Dirofilariasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía/veterinaria , Filaricidas/farmacología , Animales , Enfermedades de los Gatos/parasitología , Enfermedades de los Gatos/prevención & control , Gatos , Dirofilariasis/parasitología , Dirofilariasis/prevención & control , Ecocardiografía/normas , Femenino , Filaricidas/efectos adversos , Masculino , Radiografía Torácica/veterinaria , Distribución Aleatoria , Seguridad , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Parasitol Res ; 97 Suppl 1: S70-S75, 2005 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16228278

RESUMEN

A topically applied formulation containing 10% imidacloprid+1% moxidectin (Advocate/Advantage multi) has been developed for monthly application to cats for the prevention of feline heartworm (HW) disease caused by Dirofilaria immitis; and for the treatment and control of flea infestations, ear mite infestations, and intestinal nematode infections. A study model was designed to evaluate the safety of this product in cats harboring adult D. immitis infections. Eighty adult cats (40 males/40 females) were each inoculated with 60 third-stage D. immitis larvae on test day (TD) 1. On TD 243-245 echocardiographic imaging was performed on each cat to confirm and estimate the number of adult D. immitis residing in the cardiovascular system. A total of 35 cats were subsequently eligible for safety evaluation based on inclusion criteria. Four treatment groups were established and randomly selected for treatment: imidacloprid+moxidectin solution at the label dose (n=9) (group 1), imidacloprid+moxidectin solution at 5x the Iabel dose (n=9) (group 2), 6% selamectin topical solution (Revolution) at the label dose (positive control, n=8) (group 3), and topical treatment with placebo (negative control, n=9) (group 4). All cats were treated on TD 250. Treatments for groups 1, 3, and 4 were repeated on TDs 278 and 306. Group 2 cats were euthanized and examined for adult D. immitis on TD 288. All other cats were euthanized and examined for adult D. immitis on TD 334. No adverse events attributable to treatment with the test articles were observed during the study. The geometric mean numbers of adult D. immitis recovered at necropsy from treatment groups 1-4 were 2.9, 3.2., 4.0, and 2.7, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences in the comparison of adult D. immitis recovered at necropsy (ANOVA overall group effect P-value of 0.5356). The results of this study demonstrate that imidacloprid+moxidectin topical solution can be used safely in cats heavily infected with adult D. immitis.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades de los Gatos/tratamiento farmacológico , Dirofilariasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Imidazoles/administración & dosificación , Imidazoles/efectos adversos , Nitrocompuestos/administración & dosificación , Nitrocompuestos/efectos adversos , Animales , Antihelmínticos/administración & dosificación , Antihelmínticos/uso terapéutico , Gatos , Dirofilaria immitis , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Imidazoles/uso terapéutico , Ivermectina/análogos & derivados , Ivermectina/uso terapéutico , Macrólidos/administración & dosificación , Macrólidos/efectos adversos , Macrólidos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Neonicotinoides , Nitrocompuestos/uso terapéutico
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...