RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of a low protein diet (LPD) to delay the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains controversial. The questions persist regarding which LPD for which CKD patients? Our study aimed to investigate the role of LPD in selected patients with CKD stage G3a. METHODS: Forty-seven selected patients (23 men, mean age 55 ± 12), in stage G3a of CKD (eGFR: 45-59 ml/min) were included in this prospective 12 months study with a recommended dietary protein intake (DPI) of 0.8 g/kg/day. The DPI was estimated from 24 h urinary urea nitrogen excretion (Maroni formula). All patients were trained by dietitian-nutritionist and had one baseline control and three visits. The clinical data, blood pressure, diet-adherence, eGFR, albumin, cholesterol, hemoglobin, proteinuria, and BMI were analyzed. RESULTS: According to the adherence to LPD, the patients were divided into Adherent group (AG, n =24, 51 %) with DPI of 0.75 ± 0.25 g/kg/day and non-Adherent group (NAG, n =23, 49 %) with DPI of 1.3 ± 0.31 g/kg/day. During the follow up the eGFR decreased from 57.68 ± 4.0 to 56.11 ± 4.8, and from 55.45 ± 7.0 to 52.46 ± 7.2 for AG and NAG, respectively. The real drop of eGFR after 12 months was 1.57 for AG and 2.99 ml/min for NAG. The difference was statistically significant (p <0.01). CONCLUSION: Despite the significant percentage of non-adherent patients, our pilot study confirms the beneficial effect of LPD on CKD progression. Adherent patients in G3a stage protect more successfully their GFR compared with non-adherent patients after 12 months. CKD stages with mild reduction of GFR are more challenging for further clinical studies. HIPPOKRATIA 2018, 22(4): 178-182.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Incidence increase of diabetes mellitus (DM) has taken epidemic proportions in the world. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a most serious complication, taking a leading place as a factor in the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Dialysis treatment of these patients is complex, expensive, and exerts an excessive burden on the health budgets of the affected countries. METHODS: We performed a nationwide precise observational study with the aim of analysing diabetics on dialysis in dialysis centres throughout the Republic of Macedonia (RM) in 2002 and in 2006; to compare the results from patients records; and to gather data on the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and complications of diabetes type 1 (DM1) and diabetes type 2 (DM2). RESULTS: The prevalence of HD patients in RM was 1114 vs 1074 in 2002 and 2006, respectively. Of these, 109 (9.78%) vs. 115 (10.71%) had DM in 2002 and 2006, respectively. The percentage of diabetics on dialysis between different centers varied between 3% to 21% vs. 2.4% to 22.07% in 2002 and 2006, respectively. The mean age of the patients was 58+/-10.29 vs. 56.5+/-10.71 in 2002 and 2006, respectively. Patients with DM1 were 19 (17.43%) vs. 15 (13.04%) and with DM2 were 90 (82.57%) vs. 100 (86.96%) in 2002 and 2006, respectively. 28 (25.68%) vs. 31 (26.96%) patients were on oral anti-diabetic drugs and 62 (57.21%) vs. 69 (60%) patients were on insulin in 2002 and 2006, respectively. Mean age of DM1 patients was 47+/-11.6 y. vs. 45+/-7.32 y. respectively and of DM2 was 60.37+/-8.33 y. vs. 61.14+/-10.23 y., in 2002 and 2006, respectively. Mean time of insulin treatment was 9.5+/-6.63 y. vs. 10.85+/-9.29 y. in 2002 and 2006. Mean Body Mass Index (BMI) was 26.4 vs. 23.49+/-4.74 kg/m2 in DM1 and 25.5 vs. 24.77+/-3.70 kg/m2 in DM2 patients in 2002 and 2006, respectively. Thrombosis of first arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) occurred in 41% vs. 25.22% in 2002 and 2006, respecttitvely. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection was confirmed in 57% vs. 44% of DM patients in 2002 and 2006, respectively. Most common co-morbidity in patients was hypertension, 91% vs. 80.87% in 2002 and 2006, respectively. CONCLUSION: The number of diabetics on dialysis in the Republic of Macedonia did not increase in the period from 2002 to 2006. In DM2 diabetics on dialysis the frequency of complications is higher and time on dialysis is shorter than in DM1 patients. Early detection of diabetic nephropathy by primary care physicians as well as collaborative treatment by diabetologists, nephrologists, cardiologists and ophthalmologists before and during dialysis are important for improvement of treatment and survival of diabetic patients on dialysis.
