Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros










Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 18(1 Pt A): 53-59, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32918863

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Despite the growing presence of interventional radiology (IR) in inpatient care, its global impact on the health care system remains uncharacterized. The aim of this study was to quantitate the use of IR services rendered to hospitalized patients in the United States and the impact on cost. METHODS: The National Inpatient Sample 2016 was queried. Using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision, Clinical Modification/Procedure Classification System, adult inpatients who underwent routine IR procedures were identified. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed. Weighted patient data are presented to provide national estimates. RESULTS: Of the 29.7 million inpatient admissions in 2016, 2.3 million (7.8%) had at least one IR procedure. Patients who needed IR were older (62.8 versus 57.1 years, P < .001), were sicker on the basis of the All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Groups (27% major or extreme versus 14% for non-IR, P < .001), and had higher inpatient mortality (8.2% versus 1.7%, P < .001). While representing 7.8% of all admissions, this cohort accounted for 18.4% ($68.4 billion) of adult inpatient health care costs and about 3 times higher mean hospitalization cost compared with other inpatients ($29,402 versus $11,062, P < .001), which remained significant even after controlling for age and All Patient Refined Diagnosis Related Group. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 10 US inpatients are treated by IR during their hospitalizations. These patients are sicker, with about 4 times higher mortality and 2.5 times greater length of stay, accounting for almost one-fifth of all health care costs. These findings suggest that IR should have a voice in discussions of means to save costs and improve patient outcomes in the United States.


Asunto(s)
Hospitalización , Radiología Intervencionista , Adulto , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Tiempo de Internación , Estados Unidos
2.
Proteins ; 85(2): 221-234, 2017 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27891669

RESUMEN

Mutations in the amyloid precursor protein (APP) are responsible for the formation of amyloid-ß peptides. These peptides play a role in Alzheimer's and other dementia-related diseases. The cargo binding domain of the kinesin-1 light chain motor protein (KLC1) may be responsible for transporting APP either directly or via interaction with C-jun N-terminal kinase-interacting protein 1 (JIP1). However, to date there has been no direct experimental or computational assessment of such binding at the atomistic level. We used molecular dynamics and free energy estimations to gauge the affinity for the binary complexes of KLC1, APP, and JIP1. We find that all binary complexes (KLC1:APP, KLC1:JIP1, and APP:JIP1) contain conformations with favorable binding free energies. For KLC1:APP the inclusion of approximate entropies reduces the favorability. This is likely due to the flexibility of the 42-residue APP protein. In all cases we analyze atomistic/residue driving forces for favorable interactions. Proteins 2017; 85:221-234. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Adaptadoras Transductoras de Señales/química , Precursor de Proteína beta-Amiloide/química , Proteínas Asociadas a Microtúbulos/química , Simulación de Dinámica Molecular , Secuencias de Aminoácidos , Sitios de Unión , Humanos , Cinesinas , Cinética , Simulación del Acoplamiento Molecular , Unión Proteica , Dominios y Motivos de Interacción de Proteínas , Estructura Secundaria de Proteína , Termodinámica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...