Use of half red blood cell units in oncology patients during severe shortages to extend hospital supply.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic exerted an unprecedented impact on the blood supply from 2020 through 2022. As a result, throughout 2021 there were months our hospital had less than one-day supply of type O RBCs. To meet transfusion needs, whole RBC units were split into half units and issued to stable, non-bleeding patients. This single-institution, retrospective study examines time intervals to subsequent transfusion and total numbers of RBC units subsequently transfused after the first half or whole RBC unit. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients who were transfused RBC between May 21, 2021 and November 1, 2021 were divided into in- and outpatient groups, then based on whether they received at least 1 half RBC unit or only whole RBC units during the study period. The time interval between this first half unit transfusion, or first whole unit transfusion in those who did not receive half units, and the subsequent RBC transfusion within 90 days was calculated and compared, as well as the total number of RBC units transfused 30 days after the first unit. RESULTS: In general, patients transfused with half units received a subsequent transfusion significantly earlier than those transfused with whole units. Additionally, receiving an index half unit was associated with more RBC transfusions in the following 30 days (p = .001). CONCLUSION: Transfusion of half RBC units during a severe RBC blood shortage can temporarily decrease RBC usage but will result in a shorter interval to the next transfusion and greater total number of RBC units transfused in subsequent days.

Consolidation with First and Second Allogeneic Transplants in Adults with Relapsed/Refractory B-ALL Following Response to CD19CAR T Cell Therapy.

CD19-targeted chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has led to unprecedented rates of complete remission (CR) in children and adults with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL), yet the majority of adults relapse after initial response. One proposed method to extend the durability of remission in adults following response to CAR-T therapy is consolidation with allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT). Considering the limited published data for the utility of post CAR-T therapy consolidative alloHCT in r/r B-ALL, especially data related to patients receiving a second alloHCT, we sought to describe outcomes of patients with r/r B-ALL at our institution who received their first or second alloHCT following response to CAR-T therapy. We performed a retrospective analysis of adult patients with r/r B-ALL who responded to either investigational or standard of care (SOC) CD19-targeted CAR-T therapy and underwent consolidation with alloHCT while in CR without interim therapy. We identified 45 patients, of whom 26 (58%) and 19 (42%) received their first and second alloHCT as consolidation post CAR-T therapy, respectively. The median age was 31 years (range: 19-67) and 31 (69%) patients were Hispanic. Ph-like was the most common genetic subtype and comprised over half of cases (53%; n = 24). The median number of prior therapies pre-transplant was 5 (range: 2-7), and disease status at the time of alloHCT was CR1, CR2 or ≥CR3 in 7 (16%), 22 (49%) and 16 (35%) patients, respectively. The median time from CAR-T therapy until alloHCT was 93 (range: 42-262) days. The conditioning regimen was radiation-based myeloablative (MAC) in 22 (49%) patients. With a median follow-up of 2.47 years (range: 0.13-6.93), 2-year overall survival (OS), relapse free survival (RFS), cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) and non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 57.3% (95% CI: 0.432-0.760), 56.2% (95% CI: 0.562-0.745), 23.3% (95% CI: 0.13-0.42), and 20.4% (95% CI: 0.109-0.384), respectively. Two-year OS (52% vs. 68%, P = .641), RFS (54% vs. 59%, P = .820), CIR (33.5% vs. 8.5%, P = .104), and NRM (12.5% vs. 32.2%, P = .120) were not significantly different between patients who underwent their first vs. second transplant, respectively. In univariate analysis, only Ph-like genotype was associated with inferior RFS (P = .03). AlloHCT post CAR-T response is associated with a relatively low early mortality rate and encouraging survival results in high-risk adults with r/r B-ALL, extending to the second alloHCT for fit and eligible patients.

Immunosuppressant adherence in adult outpatient hematopoietic cell transplant recipients.

INTRODUCTION: Medication nonadherence continues to be challenging for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients. The risk and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) are associated with low immunosuppressant concentrations (which can be improved with model-informed precision dosing (MIPD)) and with immunosuppressant nonadherence (which can be improved with acceptable interventions). METHODS: With the goals of improving adherence and achieving therapeutic concentrations of immunosuppressants to eliminate GVHD, we characterized the feasibility of using the Medication Event Monitoring (MEMS®) Cap in adult HCT recipients. RESULTS: Of the 27 participants offered the MEMS® Cap at the time of hospital discharge, 7 (25.9%) used it, which is below our a priori threshold of 70%. These data suggest the MEMS® Cap is not feasible for HCT recipients. The MEMS® Cap data were available for a median of 35 days per participant per medication (range: 7-109 days). The average daily adherence per participant ranged from 0 to 100%; four participants had an average daily adherence of over 80%. CONCLUSIONS: MIPD may be supported by MEMS® technology to provide the precise time of immunosuppressant self-administration. The MEMS® Cap was used by only a small percentage (25.9%) of HCT recipients in this pilot study. In accordance with larger studies using less accurate tools to evaluate adherence, immunosuppressant adherence varied from 0% to 100%. Future studies should establish the feasibility and clinical benefit of combining MIPD with newer technology, specifically the MEMS® Button, which can inform the oncology pharmacist of the time of immunosuppressant self-administration.