Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 35
Filtrar
1.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 166(1): 169-170, 2023 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34922762
2.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 163(4): 1405-1406, 2022 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32482399
4.
7.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 28(1): 31-35, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24055281

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Effects of temporary biventricular pacing after cardiopulmonary bypass are unpredictable, and the utility of speckle-tracking echocardiography in this setting is unclear. Accordingly, speckle-tracking analysis of transgastric echocardiograms taken during cardiac surgery was assessed as a potential tool to measure strain, synchrony, and twist as indices to predict response. DESIGN: Prospective observational study, in part, with a randomized controlled study of temporary permanent biventricular pacing after cardiopulmonary bypass. SETTING: Single-center study at university-affiliated tertiary care hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one cardiac surgery candidates with ejection fraction ≤40% and QRS duration ≥100 ms or who were undergoing double-valve surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Transgastric views of the basal, midpapillary, and apical levels of the left ventricle were acquired before and after bypass. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Midpapillary sections were analyzable in 38% of patients. The remainder had epicardial borders extending beyond the field of view (24%) or inadequate image quality (38%). Only 9% of basal or apical sections were analyzable. Midpapillary radial strain and synchrony changed insignificantly after bypass. Variation in fractional area change correlated with changes in radial strain (p = 0.041) but not with synchrony. CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative transgastric echocardiography is inadequate for speckle-tracking analysis with current techniques. Intraoperative predictors of temporary biventricular pacing response are lacking.


Asunto(s)
Puente Cardiopulmonar/efectos adversos , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Disfunción Ventricular Izquierda/etiología
13.
Middle East J Anaesthesiol ; 21(6): 895-8, 2012 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23634576

RESUMEN

We report a case of congenital inferior wall left ventricular diverticulum (LVD), atrial septal defect and mental retardation detected by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography. The combination of three features strongly suggests that genetic factors play important role in the pathogenesis of the disorder. Most LVDs are asymptomatic. Echocardiographers and cardiac anesthesiologists should be aware of this anomaly, and include it in the differential diagnosis of abnormally shaped ventricular wall and seek other congenital abnormalities if LVD is detected.


Asunto(s)
Divertículo/complicaciones , Defectos del Tabique Interatrial/complicaciones , Ventrículos Cardíacos/anomalías , Discapacidad Intelectual/complicaciones , Divertículo/diagnóstico por imagen , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Femenino , Defectos del Tabique Interatrial/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad
14.
Anesth Analg ; 108(5): 1453-62, 2009 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19372319

RESUMEN

Aortic valvular stenosis remains the most common debilitating valvular heart lesion. Despite the benefit of aortic valve (AV) replacement, many high-risk patients cannot tolerate surgery. AV implantation treats aortic stenosis without subjecting patients to sternotomy, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), and aorta cross-clamping. This transcatheter procedure is performed via puncture of the left ventricular (LV) apex or percutaneously, via the femoral artery or vein. Patients undergo general anesthesia, intense hemodynamic manipulation, and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). To elucidate the role of the anesthesiologist in the management of transcatheter AV implantation, we review the literature and provide our experience, focusing on anesthetic care, intraoperative events, TEE, and perioperative complications. Two approaches to the aortic annulus are performed today: transfemoral retrograde and transapical antegrade. Iliac artery size and tortuosity, aortic arch atheroma, and pathology in the area of the (LV) apex help determine the preferred approach in each patient. A general anesthetic is tailored to achieve extubation after procedure completion, whereas IV access and pharmacological support allow for emergent sternotomy and initiation of CPB. Rapid ventricular pacing and cessation of mechanical ventilation interrupts cardiac ejection and minimizes heart translocation during valvuloplasty and prosthesis implantation. Although these maneuvers facilitate exact prosthesis positioning within the native annulus, they promote hypotension and arrhythmia. Vasopressor administration before pacing and cardioversion may restore adequate hemodynamics. TEE determines annulus size, aortic pathology, ventricular function, and mitral regurgitation. TEE and fluoroscopy are used for positioning the introducer catheter within the aortic annulus. The prosthesis, crimped on a valvuloplasty balloon catheter, is implanted by inflation. TEE immediately measures aortic regurgitation and assesses for aortic dissection. After repair of femoral vessels or LV apex, patients are allowed to emerge and assessed for extubation. Observed and published complications include aortic regurgitation, prosthesis embolization, mitral valve disruption, hemorrhage, aortic dissection, CPB, stroke, and death. Transcatheter AV implantation relies on intraoperative hemodynamic manipulation for success. Transfemoral and transapical approaches pose unique management challenges, but both require rapid ventricular pacing, the management of hypotension and arrhythmias during beating-heart valve implantation, and TEE. Anesthesiologists will care for debilitated patients with aortic stenosis receiving transcatheter AV implantation.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia General , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Válvula Aórtica/cirugía , Cateterismo Cardíaco , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/métodos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Válvula Aórtica/patología , Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/patología , Estenosis de la Válvula Aórtica/fisiopatología , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efectos adversos , Cateterismo Cardíaco/instrumentación , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial , Fármacos Cardiovasculares/administración & dosificación , Ecocardiografía Transesofágica , Electrocardiografía , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Prótesis Valvulares Cardíacas , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis de Válvulas Cardíacas/instrumentación , Hemodinámica , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios/métodos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Diseño de Prótesis , Radiografía Intervencional , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Am Coll Cardiol ; 52(13): e1-142, 2008 Sep 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18848134
18.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 72(3): E1-E12, 2008 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18671249
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA