A Health-Related Quality of Life Measure for Patients Who Undergo Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery.

PURPOSE: To develop a patient-reported outcome measure to assess the impact of glaucoma and treatment, including minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS). DESIGN: Observational study before and after concomitant cataract and Food and Drug Administration-approved implantable MIGS device surgery. SETTING: Survey administration was on a computer, iPad, or similar device. PATIENT POPULATION: 184 adults completed the baseline survey, 124 a survey 3 months after surgery, and 106 the 1-month test-retest reliability survey. The age range was 37 to 89 (average age = 72). Most were female (57%), non-Hispanic White (81%), and had a college degree (56%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Glaucoma Outcomes Survey (GOS) assesses functional limitations (27 items), vision-related symptoms (7 items), psychosocial issues (7 items), and satisfaction with microinvasive glaucoma surgery (1 item). These multiple-item scales were scored on a 0 to 100 range, with a higher score indicating worse health. RESULTS: Internal consistency reliability estimates ranged from 0.75 to 0.93, and 1-month test-retest intraclass correlations ranged from 0.83 to 0.92 for the GOS scales. Product-moment correlations among the scales ranged from 0.56 to 0.60. Improvement in visual acuity in the study eye from baseline to the 3-month follow-up was significantly related to improvements in GOS functional limitations (r = 0.18, P = .0485), vision-related symptoms (r = 0.19, P = .0386), and psychosocial concerns (r = 0.18, P = .0503). Responders to treatment ranged from 17% for vision-related symptoms to 48% for functional limitations. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports using the GOS for ophthalmic procedures such as MIGS. Further evaluation of the GOS in different patient subgroups and clinical settings is needed.

Collateral damage: heat transfer as a possible mechanism of optic nerve injury during neurosurgical intervention.

PURPOSE: To determine factors associated with increased heat transfer during neurosurgical drilling as a mechanism for optic nerve injury. METHODS: On a nonembalmed cadaver, the optic canal was exposed through a standard craniotomy and optic nerve sparing exenteration. The temperature was measured with a thermocoupler during each 30-second continuous drill session using 2 types of neurosurgical drills. The location of the probe, drill site, drill power, and irrigation rate were varied. RESULTS: A <1 °C change was measured in the optic canal at all test distances with the Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator and diamond drill. The use of manual irrigation decreased the mean change in temperature (ΔT) in the sphenoid bone from 4.7 °C without irrigation to 1.3 °C with irrigation. Increasing Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator power from 50% to 80% at an irrigation rate of 4 ml/minute more than doubled ΔT in sphenoid bone from 3.2 °C at 50% to 8.1 °C at 80%. Increasing irrigation from 2 to 4 ml/minute decreased mean ΔT by -1.1 °C (3.2 °C at 2 ml/minute versus 2.1 °C at 4 ml/minute) at Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator power of 50%, but at Cavitron Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator power of 80%, increasing irrigation increased mean ΔT by 3.0 °C (3.7 °C at 2 ml/minute versus 6.8 °C at 4 ml/minute). CONCLUSIONS: Care must be taken during neurosurgical procedures to decrease heat transfer during drilling to nearby structures. With increase in drill power, there is a noticeable increase in temperature change from baseline. These temperature changes can be mediated by irrigation, although the effect of increasing irrigation rate to suppress the raise in temperature decreases with increasing drill power.