Comprehensive analysis of laparoscopic, robotic, and open hepatectomy outcomes using the nationwide readmissions database.

Although open resections have been the most prevalent method of hepatectomies in the United States, laparoscopic and robotic methods of liver resection have since gained significant traction. Given the augmenting role of minimally invasive techniques in liver resection, a study that explores and analyzes the surgical outcomes of the approaches mentioned above to liver resection on a national basis is warranted. A retrospective analysis was performed in this study using the 2016-2018 Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). Patients who underwent liver resections via one of the following methods were selected and grouped: open, laparoscopic, or robotic. Our primary outcome variable of interest was the 45-day readmission rate. 11,186 patients were included in the analysis. The 45-day readmission rate was 13.5%, 12.9%, and 8.7% in the open, laparoscopic, and robotic groups, respectively (p < 0.001). A significantly lower complication rate (7.3%) was seen in the robotic group than its counterparts (11.4% in open vs. 9.1% in the laparoscopic group). Patients undergoing hepatectomies may benefit from the robotic approach given that it is associated with a shorter hospital length of stay and lower readmission rates.

Hospitalization Costs and Outcomes of Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Liver Resections.

INTRODUCTION: Most liver resections performed in the United States are open. With the ever-increasing role of robotic surgery, our study's role is to assess national outcomes based on the surgical approach. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the 2015 National Readmission Database (NRD). We selected patients undergoing open, laparoscopic, and robotic hepatectomy. Propensity score matching was performed to match the three groups in terms of demographics, hospital characteristics, and resection type. Our primary outcome was 6-month readmission rates and associated costs. RESULTS: 3,872 patients were included in the analysis (open = 3,420, laparoscopic = 343, and robotic = 109). Robotic liver resection has lower 6-month readmission rates (18.3%) than the laparoscopic (26.7%) and open (30%) counterparts. The robotic approach was more cost-effective ($127,716.56 ± 12,567.31) than the open ($157,880.82 ± 18,560.2) and laparoscopic approach ($152,060.78 ± 8,890.13) in terms of the total cost which includes cost per readmission. CONCLUSIONS: There is a financial benefit of using robotics in terms of cost, hospital length of stay, and readmission rates in patients undergoing liver resection, cost.

Assessing the perioperative complications and outcomes of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy using the National Cancer Database: is it ready for prime time?

Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy has generated significant interest in recent years. Our study aimed to evaluate the difference in surgical, oncological, and survival outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) by either a robotic (RPD) or open approach (OPD). Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients from 2010 and 2017 diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma and underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy by either robotic PD or open approach. Patients who underwent robotic PD during 2010 were compared to patients receiving the same procedure in 2017. In addition, a secondary analysis was performed to assess outcomes of robotic PD to open PD for the 2017 patient cohorts. Our primary outcomes included 30-day and 90-day mortality, length of stay, as well as 30-day readmission. Secondary outcome measures were surgical margins, lymph node yield, and adjuvant chemotherapy initiation within 12 weeks of surgery. When we compared the 2017 data to 2010 data, we found that robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy had lower 30- and 90-day mortality rates in 2017 compared to 2010. Additionally, we found that the lymph node yield in robotic PD increased during the study period. When we compared robotic PD to open PD for 2017, we found no statistically significant differences in readmission rates (10.1% vs. 9.7%: p-0.4), lymph node yield, or negative margin between the groups. Outcomes of robotic PD have improved over the years. In 2017, outcomes of robotic PD were similar to open PD.

Telemedicine Experience of General Surgery Trainees: Impact on Patient Care and Education.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on patient care, including the increased utilization of contact-free clinic visits using telemedicine. We looked to assess current utilization of, experience with, and opinions regarding telemedicine by general surgery residents at an academic university-based surgical training program. DESIGN: A response-anonymous 19-question survey was electronically distributed to all general surgery residents at a single academic university-based general surgery residency program. SETTING: University of Southern California (USC) general surgery residency participants: Voluntarily participating general surgery residents at the University of Southern California. RESULTS: The response rate from USC general surgery residents was 100%. A majority of residents (76%) had utilized either video- or telephone-based visits during their careers. No resident had undergone formal training to provide telemedicine, although most residents indicated a desire for training (57.1%) and acknowledged that telemedicine should be a part of surgical training (75.6%). A wide variety of opinions regarding the educational experience of residents participating in telemedicine visits was elicited. CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic brought telemedicine to the forefront as an integral part of future patient care, including for surgical patients. Additional investigations into nationwide telemedicine exposure and practice among United States general surgery residencies is imperative, and the impact of the implementation of telemedicine curricula on general surgery resident telemedicine utilization, comfort with telemedicine technology, and patient outcomes are further warranted. COMPETENCIES: Practice-based learning, systems-based practice, interpersonal and communication skills.

Hodgkin lymphoma masquerading as perforated gallbladder adenocarcinoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: There are several case reports of acute cholecystitis as the initial presentation of lymphoma of the gallbladder; all reports describe non-Hodgkin lymphoma or its subtypes on histopathology of the gallbladder tissue itself. Interestingly, there is no description in the literature of Hodgkin lymphoma causing hilar lymphadenopathy, inevitably presenting as ruptured cholecystitis with imaging mimicking gallbladder adenocarcinoma. CASE SUMMARY: A 48-year-old man with a past medical history of diabetes mellitus presented with progressive abdominal pain, jaundice, night sweats, weakness, and unintended weight loss for one month. Work-up revealed a mass in the region of the porta hepatis causing obstructions of the cystic and common hepatic ducts, gallbladder rupture, as well as retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy. The clinical picture and imaging findings were suspicious for locally advanced gallbladder adenocarcinoma causing ruptured cholecystitis and cholangitis, with metastases to retroperitoneal lymph nodes. Minimally invasive techniques, including endoscopic duct brushings and percutaneous lymph node biopsy, were inadequate for tissue diagnosis. Therefore, this case required exploratory laparotomy, open cholecystectomy, and periaortic lymph node dissection for histopathological assessment and definitive diagnosis. Hodgkin lymphoma was present in the lymph nodes while the gallbladder specimen had no evidence of malignancy. CONCLUSION: This clinical scenario highlights the importance of histopathological assessment in diagnosing gallbladder malignancy in a patient with gallbladder perforation and a grossly positive positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan. For both gallbladder adenocarcinoma and Hodgkin lymphoma, medical and surgical therapies must be tailored to the specific disease entity in order to achieve optimal long-term survival rates.

Effect of COVID-19 on Surgical Training Across the United States: A National Survey of General Surgery Residents.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 emerged as a global pandemic in 2020 and has affected millions of lives. Surgical training has also been significantly affected by this pandemic, but the exact effect remains unknown. We sought to perform a national survey of general surgery residents in the United States to assess the effect of COVID-19 on surgical resident training, education, and burnout. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was created and distributed to general surgery residents across the United States. The survey aimed to assess changes to surgical residents' clinical schedules, operative volume, and educational curricula as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, we sought to assess the impact of COVID-19 on resident burnout. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and two general surgery residents completed the survey. Residents reported a significant decline in the number of cases performed during the pandemic. Educational curricula were largely shifted toward online didactics. The majority of residents reported spending more time on educational didactics than before the pandemic. The majority of residents feared contracting COVID-19 or transmitting it to their family during the pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 has had significant impact on surgical training and education. One positive consequence of the pandemic is increased educational didactics. Online didactics should continue to be a part of surgical education in the post-COVID-19 era. Steps need to be taken to ensure that graduating surgical residents are adequately prepared for fellowship and independent practice despite the significantly decreased case volumes during this pandemic. Surgery training programs should focus on providing nontechnical clinical training and professional development during this time.

Review of Oncology and Transplant Literature for the Management of Hepatic and Pancreatic Resections in Jehovah's Witnesses.

Jehovah's Witnesses undergoing liver or pancreas surgery represent a unique medical and ethical challenge. For hepatic and pancreatic malignancies, resections are currently the only curative treatment. These surgeries pose a risk for significant blood loss, for which blood transfusions are traditionally given. However, blood transfusions are considered unacceptable to many Jehovah's Witnesses patients. As the technology of surgery as well as development of new products continue to evolve, transfusion-less surgery modalities have been utilized for Jehovah's Witnesses. The use of these transfusion-less techniques is not yet standardized for hepatic and pancreatic resections. We aimed to review both oncology and transplant medical literature on pancreatic and hepatic resection to develop guidelines for the management Jehovah's Witnesses patients.

Hepatectomy for Breast Cancer Metastasis and Sarcoma are more likely to have Adverse Outcomes than Hepatectomy for Primary Hepatocellular Cancer or for Colorectal Metastasis.

INTRODUCTION: Outcomes for hepatectomy for breast cancer metastasis and sarcomatous disease processes are not well defined in literature. We sought to use a national database to identify outcomes in these patients compared to subset of patients more well studied in literature - primary Hepatocellular cancer patients and patients with colorectal metastasis. METHODS: We identified patients undergoing major hepatectomy (≥ 3 segments) for primary hepatocellular cancer (HCC), sarcoma metastasis, breast cancer metastasis, and colorectal metastasis using NSQIP database. The Primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures were 30-day readmission and complication rates. RESULTS: A total of 5580 patients underwent major hepatectomy during the study period. Patients who underwent hepatectomy for breast cancer metastasis had higher incidence of in-hospital complications (37%) compared to sarcoma (29%), colon (26%), and HCC patients (24%) and 30-days readmission rate (37% vs. 29% - sarcoma vs. 26% - colon vs. 25% HCC). There was no difference in 30-days mortality among the groups. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing major hepatectomies for breast cancer metastasis and sarcoma are more likely to have adverse outcomes than compared to their counterparts. This difference highlights the lack of experience in managing breast cancer and sarcoma with metastatic disease to the liver. This also highlights the difference in tumor biology among all the lesions we studied. An extensive discussion should take place when dealing with breast and sarcoma lesions in the liver because of these outcomes.

A Potential Role for Robotic Cholecystectomy in Patients with Advanced Liver Disease: Analysis of the NSQIP Database.

Robotic surgery has been widely adopted by many specialties, including hepatobiliary surgery. However, robotic procedures generally require longer operative times and are costlier than their laparoscopic counterparts. The role for robotic cholecystectomy (RC), particularly in patients with advanced liver disease, has not been established. A retrospective analysis of the NSQIP database was performed, focusing on patients with chronic liver disease who underwent cholecystectomy. Patients were categorized based on their model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and the type of surgical procedure: open, laparoscopic, or RC. Rates of a variety of postoperative complications including length of stay (LOS) were analyzed. In patients with a MELD score of 21 to 30, open cholecystectomy was associated with a long hospital LOS (3 vs 1 vs 1; P -0.01). RC was equivalent to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in terms of perioperative mortality for higher MELD score patients but was associated with lower conversion rates and overall LOS. This data suggests that RC should be considered in patients with advanced liver disease needing cholecystectomy.

Perception of training in hepatopancreatobiliary surgery among general surgery residents in the Americas.

BACKGROUND: Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgery experience during residency in the Americas is limited. Residents interested in HPB surgery have different options available for further training. This study evaluated training in HPB surgery received during general surgery (GS) residency, and sought to determine the perception of fellowship training in HPB surgery. METHODS: An anonymous survey was distributed to all 259 GS residency programs in the United States. Questions evaluated demographics, program structure, overall training & HPB experience in particular during residency, plans for fellowship training and understanding of training in HPB surgery. RESULTS: Of the 340 respondents, 162 (48%) were from university programs, 145 (43%) from community hospitals and 48 (14%) from independent medical centers. 117 (34%) were residents in postgraduate year 4 or 5 (PGY4/PGY5). 275 (81%) respondents were planning to pursue fellowship training after finishing residency. Three quarters of all respondents did not feel comfortable about performing liver, biliary and pancreatic procedures. Fellowships accredited by the Americas Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Association (AHPBA) are the most common pathway considered by residents for HPB training. CONCLUSIONS: GS residents are not comfortable in considering performing complex HPB cases on completion of residency training. GS residents consider AHPBA accredited fellowships to be more suitable for advanced training in HPB surgery.

T2 Gallbladder Cancer-Aggressive Therapy Is Warranted.

Treatment of gall bladder cancer (GBC) has traditionally been viewed with pessimism and lymph node positivity has been associated with worse prognosis. The aim of this study is to analyze the role of radical cholecystectomy in T2 tumors. All patients who underwent surgery for GBC between September 2005 and June 2014 were identified retrospectively. Data collected included clinical presentation, operative findings, and histopathological data. Twenty-five patients had incidental GBC diagnosis after cholecystectomy. Ten patients were T2 on initial cholecystectomy pathology and all underwent radical resection. Two patients were N1 on initial cholecystectomy pathology. Four were upstaged to N1 and two patients were upstaged to T3 after further surgery. Overall, 60 per cent patients with T2 disease had node positivity and 60 per cent were upstaged by further surgery. Eleven patients were diagnosed on imaging. Four of these patients were unresectable and six were either stage T3 or higher or node positive. Sixty per cent of T2 GBC was node positive and 60 per cent were upstaged with radical cholecystectomy. This finding supports the call for radical resection in patients with incidental diagnosis of T2 tumor on cholecystectomy. This study also emphasizes the role of radical surgery in accurate T staging.

Duodenal Neuroendocrine Tumors: Location Matters!

Duodenal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare. Historically, when feasible a less aggressive surgical approach is considered. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with prognosis and the necessity for more aggressive surgical procedures. All patients who underwent surgery for duodenal NETs between September 2005 and June 2014 were identified retrospectively. Data collected included clinical presentation, operative findings, and histopathological data. Eighteen patients underwent surgical management for duodenal NETs. Two patients underwent transduodenal excision (11%), two patients had partial duodenal resection (11%), two patients had antrectomy including 1st part of duodenum (D1) resection (33%), and eight underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy [PD (44%)]. On analysis, 2nd part of duodenum (D2) location was the most common site of duodenal NETs (n = 9, 50%). The odds of having a PD were 10 times higher when the lesion was in D2 location. The odds of having a positive lymph node are nine times higher when the lesion is in D2 region. The odds of having a positive lymph node are three times higher when lesion is greater than T1. D2 location of NETs is associated with higher odds of lymph node positivity and need for more extensive procedures like PD.

Attributes of Candidates Passing the ABS Certifying Examination on the First Attempt-Program Directors׳ Perspective.

BACKGROUND: The American Board of Surgery Certifying Examination (CE) is a pivotal event in a surgeon's career development, as it is the last challenge before achieving Board certification. First-time pass rate on the CE is one of the key metrics of surgery residency programs. The overall pass rate on the CE has declined significantly in recent years. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was the identification of attributes of general surgery residents that are associated with passing the CE at the first attempt. METHODS: The modified Delphi process was used to survey general surgery program directors. The study was conducted in 2 rounds in the interest of time available for surgical education research fellowship project. RESULTS: All 259 program directors were contacted in each round of surveys. In all, 49 (19%) responded to the first round and 54 (21%) responded to the second round of survey. CONCLUSIONS: The characteristics of a successful resident on CE include confidence, self-motivation, sound knowledge base, strong performance on the Board's training examination (American Board of Surgery In-Training Examination), and mock orals, and good communication skills. Postgraduate years 4 and 5 are the most likely resident levels at which failure could be predicted.

Novel knot tying technique for robot-assisted surgery.

Robot-assisted surgery has seen significant advancements in recent years, with dedicated training opportunities to acquire adequate skills. With improved degree of rotation and movement offered by the robot arm, newer techniques of knot tying need to be developed. Here we present a novel method of knot tying to help place a secure knot, especially with short suture length.