Case report: A choroidal fissure pial arteriovenous malformation inducing venous congestive edema of the medulla oblongata and cervicothoracic spinal cord presented with proximal arm predominant weakness.

Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) can induce remote myelopathy via spinal perimedullary venous drainage. In the present study, we report a rare case of intracranial pial arteriovenous malformation (AVM)-related myelopathy. A 52-year-old man presented with progressive, predominantly proximal weakness and muscle atrophy in bilateral upper limbs, urinary retention, and hyperreflexia in bilateral upper and lower limbs. Brain and cervicothoracic MRI showed longitudinal myelopathy extending from the medulla oblongata to the T6 level, with perimedullary enlarged veins from the C1 to T12 level, and remarkable enhancement in bilateral anterior horns from the C2 to C7 level. Cerebral angiography revealed a choroidal fissure AVM, which was supplied by the left anterior choroidal artery and drained exclusively by an inferior ventricular vein descending toward the spinal perimedullary veins. After endovascular embolization of the feeding pedicle, nidus, and proximal segment of the draining vein, the patient's neurological deficits rapidly improved, and a significant recovery was achieved 3 months after the procedure. This rare case indicates that intracranial pial AVM can also cause extensive congestive myelopathy with similar mechanisms underlying intracranial and craniocervical DAVF cases, and gray matter in the spinal cord might be more susceptible to ischemia induced by intraspinal venous hypertension.

[Initial application of brain protection device in dilatation and stenting of carotid and vertebral artery stenosis].

OBJECTIVE: To report the initial application of brain protection device in the dilatation and stenting of atherosclerotic stenosis of the carotid and vertebral artery. METHODS: Eighteen patients with 21 atherosclerotic stenoses of the carotid or vertebral artery underwent dilatation and/or stenting with brain protection device (filterwire or angioguard). The clinical results were summarized and the indispensability and feasibility of the device was discussed. RESULTS: With the aid of brain protection device, endovascular dilatation and (or) stenting were performed in all the patients with 21 stenoses of the carotid or vertebral artery. The interventional manipulation was successful and no complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Brain protection device is helpful to decrease the embolic complication caused by atherosclerotic plaque and thromboembolus and to increase the security of interventional therapy, during the dilatation and/or stenting of stenosis of the carotid or vertebral artery.