RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) as an intraoperative vaginal preparation has been shown to be more effective than vaginal povidone-iodine (PI) in decreasing vaginal bacterial colony counts. However, PI remains the standard vaginal preparation because of concerns of CHG's potential for vaginal irritation. The primary outcome of this study is a comparison of the rate of patient-reported vaginal irritation between 2% CHG and PI. METHODS: Consecutive patients were enrolled in a pre-post study. Group 1 consisted of consecutive patients who received PI as a vaginal preparation. Group 2 consisted of consecutive patients who received 2% CHG as a vaginal preparation. Patients used a standardized instrument to report irritation to trained nurse practitioners 1 day after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 117 patients received vaginal operative preparation during the course of the study, with 64 patients in group 1 and 53 patients in group 2. Of the patients in group 1, 60 (93.7%) reported no vaginal irritation, 3 (4.69%) reported mild irritation, and 1 (1.56%) reported moderate irritation. In group 2 (2% CHG vaginal preparation), all of the patients (100%) reported no vaginal irritation (P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: The use of 2% CHG as a vaginal operative preparation is not associated with increased vaginal irritation compared with PI in gynecologic surgery. It can safely be used, taking advantage of its efficacy in reducing vaginal bacterial colony counts.