Comparison of antiviral responses in two bat species reveals conserved and divergent innate immune pathways.

Bats host a range of disease-causing viruses without displaying clinical symptoms. The mechanisms behind this are a continuous source of interest. Here, we studied the antiviral response in the Egyptian fruit bat and Kuhl's pipistrelle, representing two subordinal clades. We profiled the antiviral response in fibroblasts using RNA sequencing and compared bat with primate and rodent responses. Both bats upregulate similar genes; however, a subset of these genes is transcriptionally divergent between them. These divergent genes also evolve rapidly in sequence, have specific promoter architectures, and are associated with programs underlying tolerance and resistance. Finally, we characterized antiviral genes that expanded in bats, with duplicates diverging in sequence and expression. Our study reveals a largely conserved antiviral program across bats and points to a set of genes that rapidly evolve through multiple mechanisms. These can contribute to bat adaptation to viral infection and provide directions to understanding the mechanisms behind it.

Rapidly evolving viral motifs mostly target biophysically constrained binding pockets of host proteins.

Evolutionary changes in host-virus interactions can alter the course of infection, but the biophysical and regulatory constraints that shape interface evolution remain largely unexplored. Here, we focus on viral mimicry of host-like motifs that allow binding to host domains and modulation of cellular pathways. We observe that motifs from unrelated viruses preferentially target conserved, widely expressed, and highly connected host proteins, enriched with regulatory and essential functions. The interface residues within these host domains are more conserved and bind a larger number of cellular proteins than similar motif-binding domains that are not known to interact with viruses. In contrast, rapidly evolving viral-binding human proteins form few interactions with other cellular proteins and display high tissue specificity, and their interfaces have few inter-residue contacts. Our results distinguish between conserved and rapidly evolving host-virus interfaces and show how various factors limit host capacity to evolve, allowing for efficient viral subversion of host machineries.