RESUMEN
Background In the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic, the development of care processes that reduce the need for in-person clinic visits while maintaining low complication rates is needed. The purpose of this study is to assess the outcomes of patients undergoing trigger finger release with various suture and follow-up visit types to assess the feasibility of shifting towards telemedicine-based follow-up protocols. Methods A retrospective review of 329 patients undergoing trigger finger release was performed. Patients were classified based on whether or not they received in-office follow-ups; whether they received absorbable or non-absorbable sutures; and whether they were treated using a telemedicine and absorbable suture protocol or other combination of sutures and follow-ups. Univariate statistics were performed to compare outcomes between groups. Results Patients who did not undergo in-office follow-up were more likely to experience residual stiffness or contracture (11.4% vs. 4.1%; p=0.033) but had no significant differences in 30-day reoperation, emergency department (ED) returns, wound complaints, and Quick DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand) scores. When comparing chromic absorbable sutures to non-absorbable sutures, those with absorbable sutures were significantly more likely to have telemedicine visits but were also more likely to have wound complaints (17.9% vs. 8.5%; p=0.022). There was no significant difference in two- and six-week pain scores, 30-day reoperation, ED returns, residual symptoms, and Quick DASH scores. When comparing patients treated using the absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol with those receiving any other type of suture and postoperative follow-up, no significant differences in any postoperative clinical outcome measures were observed. Conclusion The results of this study demonstrate that the use of an absorbable suture and telemedicine protocol for patients undergoing trigger finger release yields similar outcomes as traditional methods of care. However, the use of absorbable sutures may result in decreased patient satisfaction with surgical wound healing.
RESUMEN
Dislocation of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint is a rare injury; chronic CMC dislocation can lead to significant disability. Traditionally, surgical intervention has focused on the reconstruction of the anterior oblique ligament, though more recently there has been more focus on the dorsoradial ligament. Consideration of both ligaments during CMC joint reconstruction is important to optimize functional outcomes. A 59-year-old male presented with a subacute/chronically dislocated CMC joint of the thumb. Open reduction with pin fixation and dorsoradial ligament repair and augmentation was chosen to restore the stability of the joint. Joint reduction without subluxation was successfully maintained. By 12 weeks postoperatively, there were no remaining major restrictions to activity. Repair of the dorsoradial ligament with augmentation and pinning is a viable approach for surgical management of subacute/chronic dislocation of the thumb CMC joint.
RESUMEN
CASE: A 7-year-old boy sustained a Monteggia fracture-dislocation. Corrective osteotomy of the ulna was performed to restore proper forearm anatomy and achieve radial head reduction. Recurrent radial head instability was noted postoperatively, and magnetic resonance imaging indicated recurrent dislocation of the radial head with, notably, an entrapped brachialis tendon and annular ligament. Open reduction of the elbow was performed. Anatomic reduction of the radiocapitellar joint and full range of motion without instability was achieved. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of persistent radial head instability because of an entrapped brachialis tendon.
