Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Oper Dent ; 47(5): 481-491, 2022 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36098547

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the postoperative sensitivity of different resin composite/adhesive materials, placed either by an incremental or bulk-fill technique in posterior resin composite replacement of amalgam restorations. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 47 patients with good overall health and at least four class I or class II amalgam restorations to be replaced participated in this study. The characteristics of 188 cavities were registered and randomly restored using incremental (Z350XT, 3M) or bulk-fill (Filtek Bulk Fill, 3M; Sonic Fill, Kerr; and Opus Bulk Fill, FGM) technique. The postoperative sensitivity was assessed using a Visual Analog Scale (0-100) after 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days. Pain scores were temporally analyzed using Friedman test followed by Dunn post hoc test (α=0.05). The frequency of tests was calculated according to the frequency and percentage of the McNemar test. RESULTS: The restorative technique and the bulk-fill system used did not affect the postoperative sensitivity, except for Filtek Bulk Fill group, which presented less postoperative sensitivity after 24 hours (p=0.037). Regardless of the restorative material, the postoperative sensitivity decreased after 24 hours, and no differences were found after 7 and 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: After 1 week, the filling technique and the bulk-fill system have no influence on the postoperative sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Caries Dental , Restauración Dental Permanente , Resinas Compuestas/uso terapéutico , Atención Odontológica , Materiales Dentales , Restauración Dental Permanente/métodos , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA