The Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test Can Predict Falls in Clinically Stable Outpatients With COPD: A 12-MO PROSPECTIVE COHORT STUDY.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the accuracy of the Mini-Balance Evaluation System Test (Mini-BESTest) for predicting falls in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and investigated whether postural balance is a risk factor for falls. METHODS: Postural balance was evaluated by the Mini-BESTest at baseline, and the incidence of falls over a 12-mo period was prospectively measured by a self-reported falls diary and confirmed by telephone calls. A discriminative power analysis was performed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Sixty-seven outpatients with COPD (mean age ± SD = 67 ± 9.3 yr) were included. Twenty-five patients (37.3%) experienced ≥1 fall, and 28.2% of the falls resulted in injuries. The Mini-BESTest predicted falls in patients with COPD at the 6- and 12-mo follow-ups with a cut-off score of 22.5 (area under the curve = 0.85 and 0.87) with good sensitivity and specificity (85.7% and 66.7%; 84% and 73.8%, respectively). Higher scores on the Mini-BESTest were associated with a lower risk of falls at 12 mo (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36-0.70; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Postural balance assessed by the Mini-BESTest is a good predictor of falls in patients with COPD. Our results imply that impaired balance contributes to the risk of falling and that balance training and fall prevention programs may be required for this population.

Objective structured clinical evaluation as an assessment method for undergraduate chest physical therapy students: a cross-sectional study / Avaliação clínica objetiva e estruturada como um método para avaliar estudantes de graduação em fisioterapia respiratória: um estudo transversal

BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) has been considered a reliable method for the evaluation of students' clinical skills in health sciences, but it has been rarely applied in the teaching of physical therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the OSCE as a tool to evaluate the abilities of undergraduate chest physical therapy students and to verify the internal consistency of the OSCE exam. METHODS: Forty-seven students were evaluated using two types of exams: the traditional exam and the OSCE. Independent educators elaborated the exams. Each question (traditional) or station (OSCE) was given a score ranging from 0.0 to 2.0; being 10.0 the highest possible score of both exams. The relationship between the total score that were obtained from both exams was analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was evaluated by four experienced chest physical therapists and it was tested using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The students' average score on the OSCE ranged from 4.4 to 9.6. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was considered good (0.7). The agreement between exams was analyzed, and it was determined that the exams are not comparable. Examiners also observed a low agreement between the two exams (r=-0.1; p=0.9). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that OSCE and traditional exams are not interchangeable. The OSCE exam had good internal consistency and is able to evaluate aspects that the traditional exam fails to evaluate.

CONTEXTUALIZAÇÃO: A avaliação clínica objetiva e estruturada (OSCE) é considerada um método confiável para avaliar as competências clínicas de estudantes na área de saúde, entretanto tem sido pouco aplicada no ensino de fisioterapia. OBJETIVO: Analisar o uso da OSCE como uma ferramenta para avaliar as habilidades dos alunos de graduação em fisioterapia respiratória e verificar sua consistência interna. MÉTODOS: Quarenta e sete alunos foram avaliados por meio de dois exames: tradicional e OSCE. As provas foram elaboradas por educadores independentes. Para cada questão (tradicional) ou estação (OSCE), atribuiu-se uma pontuação de 0 a 2. A pontuação máxima possível em ambos os exames foi de 10. As relações entre as pontuações obtidas nos dois exames foram analisadas por meio de Bland-Altman e Correlação de Pearson. A consistência interna das estações da OSCE foi avaliada por quatro fisioterapeutas experientes e foi testada pelo Alfa de Cronbach. RESULTADOS: A pontuação média dos estudantes na OSCE oscilou entre 4,4 e 9,6. A consistência interna das estações da OSCE foi considerada boa (0,7). A concordância entre os exames foi analisada, e determinou-se que os exames não são comparáveis. Os examinadores também observaram uma baixa concordância entre os dois exames (r=-0,1, p=0,9). CONCLUSÃO: Nossos resultados mostraram que a OSCE e o exame tradicional não são intercambiáveis. O exame da OSCE teve uma boa consistência interna, sendo capaz de avaliar aspectos que o exame tradicional não avalia.

Objective structured clinical evaluation as an assessment method for undergraduate chest physical therapy students: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: The Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) has been considered a reliable method for the evaluation of students' clinical skills in health sciences, but it has been rarely applied in the teaching of physical therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the use of the OSCE as a tool to evaluate the abilities of undergraduate chest physical therapy students and to verify the internal consistency of the OSCE exam. METHODS: Forty-seven students were evaluated using two types of exams: the traditional exam and the OSCE. Independent educators elaborated the exams. Each question (traditional) or station (OSCE) was given a score ranging from 0.0 to 2.0; being 10.0 the highest possible score of both exams. The relationship between the total score that were obtained from both exams was analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis and Pearson's correlation coefficient. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was evaluated by four experienced chest physical therapists and it was tested using Cronbach's alpha. RESULTS: The students' average score on the OSCE ranged from 4.4 to 9.6. The internal consistency of the OSCE stations was considered good (0.7). The agreement between exams was analyzed, and it was determined that the exams are not comparable. Examiners also observed a low agreement between the two exams (r=-0.1; p=0.9). CONCLUSION: Our results showed that OSCE and traditional exams are not interchangeable. The OSCE exam had good internal consistency and is able to evaluate aspects that the traditional exam fails to evaluate.