Variation in dentist participation between dental medicaid managed care organizations.

OBJECTIVES: Dentists' Medicaid participation is a critical factor affecting dental care access for Medicaid beneficiaries. An important gap in existing literature is the variation in participation across Medicaid dental Managed Care Organizations (MCOs) in states with more than one. This study examined the variation in participation overall and in predictors of dentist participation between two MCOs in Iowa's Dental Medicaid program. METHODS: Data were obtained from a survey of Iowa private practice dentists (n = 1256). Responding general dentists (n = 497) were included in the final analytic sample. Univariate, bivariate, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine demographic and practice characteristics associated with dentist participation (acceptance of new Medicaid patients) between MCOs and by age category. RESULTS: Among respondents, the proportions accepting new adults with Medicaid were 26% (MCO 1) and 7% (MCO 2); for children, they were 40% (MCO 1) and 11% (MCO 2). For adults, dentists who were too busy (MCO1) and solo practice dentists (MCO2) were positively significantly associated with the acceptance of new patients. For children, group and rural practice dentists, as well as dentists who worked <32 h/week were positively significantly associated with acceptance of new patients with MCO1. CONCLUSIONS: There was considerable variation in dentist-reported acceptance of new adult and child Medicaid patients, and in the factors affecting acceptance of new patients between MCOs in Iowa dental Medicaid. Future studies of Medicaid participation should consider variations by MCO in states with more than one dental MCO so as not to miss important factors affecting Medicaid participation.

Integration of dental therapists in safety net practice increases access to oral health care in Minnesota.

OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates the impact of introducing dental therapists (DTs) into Children's Dental Services (CDS), a large non-profit organization in Minnesota. The aim is to assess the effect of DTs in improving access and reducing dental care costs in Minnesota by analyzing the trends in dental care delivery and procedures performed by CDS dentists and therapists. METHODS: Using 2009 to 2021 data from CDS, the study compares trends in patient volume, types of procedures, salary data and payments by dentists, DTs, and registered dental hygienists (RDH). Return on investment (ROI) trends are calculated using salary and revenues for each provider type. RESULTS: After introducing DTs at CDS and implementing mobile clinics, the number of patients served and volume increased steadily, demonstrating increased access. DTs provided an increasing proportion of fluorides, sealants, and extractions through 2020. Interestingly 2021, there was a decrease for DTs, possibly due to Covid related workforce shortages. ROI analysis showed that DTs' ROI dramatically rose, eventually surpassing dentists, while RDHs maintained a constant ROI. Dentists' ROI also initially increased after adopting DTs in the practice. CONCLUSION: Integrating DTs at CDS improved access by expanding mobile clinics, increasing patient volume, and redistributing procedures, while demonstrating a positive return on investment. Results suggest that adopting the DT model may be a promising practice for other organizations seeking to improve access to dental care, increase operational efficiency, and boost the dental care team's ROI.

Effect of being overweight and obese on periodontal treatment costs.

BACKGROUND: Obesity can increase a person's risk of developing periodontal disease, and patients with obesity have greater health care costs. However, the effect of obesity on periodontal treatment costs has not been examined. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from the electronic dental records of adult patients examined from July 1, 2010, through July 31, 2019 at a US dental school. Primary exposure was body mass index, which was categorized as obese, overweight, or normal. Periodontal disease was categorized using clinical probing measures. Fee schedules and procedure codes were used to compute the primary outcome, which was total periodontal treatment costs. A generalized linear model with gamma distribution was used to examine the relationship between body mass index and periodontal costs after controlling for initial periodontal disease severity and other confounding variables. Parameter coefficients and mean ratios with 95% CIs were estimated. RESULTS: The study sample included 3,443 adults, of whom 39% were normal weight, 37% were overweight, and 24% were obese. Mean (SD) total periodontal treatment costs for patients who were obese were considerably higher ($420 [$719]) than those for patients who were overweight ($402 [$761]) and patients who were normal weight ($268 [$601]). After controlling for covariates and disease severity, patients who were obese had 27% higher periodontal treatment costs than patients who were normal weight. The additional periodontal treatment costs attributable to obesity were greater than those attributable to either diabetes or smoking. CONCLUSIONS: The study results suggest that among patients at a dental school, those who were obese incurred substantially higher periodontal treatment costs than patients who were normal weight, independent of initial periodontal disease severity. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The study findings have important implications for clinical guidelines and dental benefit design and coverage policies.

Perceived racial discrimination partially mediates racial-ethnic disparities in dental utilization and oral health.

OBJECTIVES: Perceived racial discrimination has been associated with poor health outcomes, yet its impact on oral health disparities is not understood. We examine the role of perceived racial discrimination in healthcare settings in explaining racial-ethnic disparities in dental visits and tooth loss. METHODS: We used behavioral risk factor surveillance system (BRFSS) data for 2014 from four diverse states (AZ, MN, MS and NM) that included "reactions to race" module. Using Poisson regression to estimate risk ratios, we employed inverse odds ratio(IOR)-weighted estimation for mediation analyses to estimate the role of perceived discrimination, after equalizing other confounders and risk factors. RESULTS: We found that among those with similar risk factors, those who experienced racial discrimination were 15% less likely to visit a dentist, and 12% more likely to have tooth loss than those who were treated same as other races. Both Hispanics and non-Hispanic Blacks were 26% less likely to visit a dentist (for Hispanics, RR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.69-0.78; for non-Hispanic Blacks, RR = 0.74, 95%CI: 0.70-0.79), and non-Hispanic Blacks were 36% more likely to have tooth loss relative to non-Hispanic Whites with similar risk factors (RR = 1.36, 95%CI: 1.28-1.45). Perceived discrimination appears to contribute to racial-ethnic disparities in dental utilization among Hispanics, and disparities in tooth loss among non-Hispanic Blacks, relative to non-Hispanic Whites. CONCLUSIONS: Perceived racial discrimination partially explains the racial-ethnic disparities in dental utilization and tooth loss among those who otherwise share the same risk factors for these outcomes. Addressing discrimination and systemic racism can reduce the racial-ethnic disparities in oral health.

The association between the supplemental nutrition assistance programme participation and dental caries among U.S. adults.

INTRODUCTION: The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (SNAP) is a federal programme aimed to alleviate hunger and improve food insecurity. The impact of SNAP participation on overall health has been studied. However, little is known about the effects of SNAP participation on oral health. We aimed to investigate the association between participating in SNAP and dental caries and to explore the role of food insecurity as a moderator in this relationship. METHODS: We obtained data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles 2011-2012 and 2013-2014.The primary outcome was untreated dental caries (none vs. one or more). Self-reported SNAP participation status in the past 12 months was the predictor, and food security was the moderator. Food security was measured as overall food security status (full food secure/ food insecure) and household-level food security (full, marginal, low and very low). Bivariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between SNAP and dental caries, and whether food insecurity moderates this relationship. Statistical analysis was carried out in September 2020. RESULTS: Our results suggested that after adjusting for potential confounders, SNAP participants were more likely to have untreated dental caries than non-SNAP participants (odds ratio: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2-2.0). Food security status did not alter the relationship between SNAP participation and untreated dental caries. CONCLUSIONS: Food security status did not alter the relationship between SNAP participation and untreated dental caries. SNAP participation was associated with untreated dental caries among U.S. adults, and this was not affected by their food security status.

The association between food insecurity, diet quality, and untreated caries among US children.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to examine the association between food insecurity and untreated caries among US children and the potential role of diet quality as a mediator in this relationship. METHODS: The authors analyzed data for 4,822 children aged 5 through 17 years from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey cycles from 2011 through 2014. The authors measured food security as household-level food security status (full, marginal, low, very low) and overall food security status (full food secure, food insecure). They measured diet quality using the Healthy Eating Index. The primary outcome measure was untreated caries (none, ≥ 1). The authors used multiple logistic regression analysis to evaluate the relationships among food insecurity, diet quality, and untreated caries. They conducted mediation analysis using the Baron and Kenny approach. RESULTS: Food-insecure children were more likely to have untreated caries compared with their fully food-secure counterparts, after controlling for confounding variables (odds ratio [OR], 1.38; 95% [CI, 1.11 to 1.72). Specifically, children from marginal and very low food-secure households had significantly higher odds of untreated caries (OR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.01) compared with children from fully food-secure households (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.12 to 2.26). Diet quality was not significantly associated with untreated caries. CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity was negatively associated with untreated caries among US children. Diet quality was not associated with untreated caries. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Social factors such as food insecurity should be taken into consideration when dental clinicians perform caries risk assessment because caries risk is shown to be associated with overall health and dental health.

Medicaid adult dental benefits and oral health of low-income older adults.

BACKGROUND: Older adults are keeping their natural teeth longer, spurring calls for dental coverage under Medicare. Although Medicare dental coverage would benefit all older adults, the poorest among them are already eligible for dental benefits through Medicaid. The authors examine the association between states' Medicaid adult dental benefits and dental care use and tooth loss among low-income older adults. METHODS: Using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System data from 2014, 2016, and 2018, the authors examined adults 65 years or older. The outcomes examined included annual dental visit and partial and complete tooth loss. Poisson regressions were used to obtain risk ratios after adjusting for covariates. RESULTS: States' Medicaid adult dental benefits were significantly associated with dental care use, with low-income older adults in states with no coverage having the lowest probability of visiting a dentist (risk ratio [RR], 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74 to 0.94), followed by emergency-only coverage (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84 to 0.98) and limited benefits (RR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.85 to 0.98) relative to states with extensive benefits. There were no significant differences in either partial or complete tooth loss. CONCLUSIONS: States' Medicaid adult dental benefits are significantly associated with dental visits among low-income seniors. Providing comprehensive dental benefits under Medicaid can improve access to dental care among low-income older adults. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: As the older adult patient population grows, the poorest older adults may face barriers to dental care in the absence of dental coverage. Dental professionals must engage in advocating for comprehensive dental coverage, especially for vulnerable populations.

The association between food insecurity and dental caries among U.S. adults: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination survey.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between food insecurity and untreated dental caries using a nationally representative sample of US adults. METHODS: Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) cycles 2011-2012 and 2013-2014 on adults aged 18 years and older were analysed (n = 10 723). Primary predictors were overall food security (food-secure/ food-insecure) and household food security (full, marginal, low and very low). The main outcome was any untreated dental caries (none/ ≥ one). Multiple logistic regression analyses were done to estimate the adjusted odds ratio after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: Food-insecure adults were more likely to have untreated dental caries than food-secure adults after adjusting for potential confounders (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.9-1.5). Adults from households with marginal (OR:1.4; 95% CI:1.5-2.2), low (OR:1.3, 95% CI:1.3-2.0) and very low food security (OR:1.3; 95% CI:0.9-1.5) had higher odds of untreated caries than adults from households with full food security. Following age stratification, marginal, low and very low food-secure adults had higher prevalence of untreated dental caries than full food-secure adults across all age groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that food-insecure adults had higher odds of untreated dental caries than food-secure adults. These findings highlight the importance of assessing food insecurity as a risk factor for dental caries. Longitudinal cohort studies are recommended to determine causal mechanisms.

Changes in Dental Benefits and Use of Emergency Departments for Nontraumatic Dental Conditions in Massachusetts.

OBJECTIVES: Research examining the effect of changes in Medicaid dental benefits on emergency department (ED) use for dental conditions has had mixed results. We examined the effect of changes in Medicaid dental benefits on ED use for nontraumatic dental conditions (NTDCs) among adults in Massachusetts before and after Medicaid dental benefits for adults were eliminated (July 2010) and partially restored (January 2013). METHODS: We used 2009-2013 data from the Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database. The study population included Medicaid enrollees aged ≥21 who made a visit to the ED for an NTDC that was paid for by Medicaid during the study period. We used an interrupted time-series study design and segmented regression model to assess the effect of the policy changes on ED use for NTDCs. We also conducted a subanalysis by patient age, sex, and geographic location. RESULTS: During the study period, 21 731 Medicaid enrollees aged ≥21 made 35 660 NTDC ED visits. Eliminating comprehensive dental benefits led to a significant increase in the use of EDs for NTDCs. This increase occurred over time (11% increase at 15 months after elimination of comprehensive dental benefits; estimate, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.07-1.21]; P = .03) rather than immediately after the policy change took effect. The partial restoration of certain dental benefits led to a significant decrease in the rate of ED visits for NTDCs over time (15.7% decrease at 5 months after partial restoration of certain dental benefits; estimate, -0.97 [95% CI, -1.83 to -0.11]; P = .03). CONCLUSION: Strengthening dental coverage policies for adult Medicaid enrollees could decrease their reliance on EDs for NTDCs.

Chronic Disease Counseling and Screening by Dental Professionals: Results From NHANES, 2011-2016.

INTRODUCTION: Dental visits may provide an opportunity to counsel and screen for chronic disease prevention. However, few studies have used nationally representative data to assess the potential role of dental professionals in chronic disease prevention. We examined the percentage of US adults who reported chronic disease counseling and screening by dental professionals. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2011-2016 for 5,541 participants aged 30 or older who reported seeing a dental professional in the past year and estimated the percentage who reported receiving counseling about selected chronic disease prevention during the visit. We used logistic regressions to examine associations between risk factors and counseling. RESULTS: Overall, 4.0% (standard error [SE], 0.3) of adults were told by a dental professional about the benefits of checking blood glucose, 42.4% (SE, 2.9) giving up tobacco (among tobacco users), 26.6% (SE, 1.2) about checking for oral cancer, and 43.0% (SE, 1.8) had an oral cancer examination. Groups with risk factors were more likely to receive health behavior counseling than those without (eg, those previously told they had diabetes risk factors were more likely to receive blood glucose counseling than those without [8.1% vs 3.3%, P < .05]). The pattern for oral cancer counseling and receiving an oral cancer examination was different: adults without oral cancer risk factors (no tobacco use, normal/underweight, and/or excellent/very good health) were more likely to receive oral cancer counseling or screening. Adjusted analyses did not change these associations. CONCLUSION: Most adults were not counseled about chronic disease prevention during a visit with a dental professional. Current tobacco users and those with overweight or obesity were more likely to report receiving counseling.