RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To compare biochemical recurrence free survival (BCRFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) after brachytherapy using the AUA and the Phoenix definitions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 2634 men with T1-T4N0M0 prostate cancer were treated with brachytherapy with or without neoadjuvant hormonal therapy or external beam radiation therapy. Five, 10, and 15- year BCRFS and CSS were estimated with Kaplan-Meier estimates with log rank. Multivariate analysis of survival was performed with Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Median age was 66, follow-up was 8.6 years, and prostate specific antigen was 6.9. Overall, 11.1% (nâ¯=â¯293) of patients experienced Phoenix BCR and 17.48% (nâ¯=â¯457) experienced AUA BCR. The rates of AUA BCR and Phoenix BCR were significantly different at 5 and 10-years but not at 15 years. Patients treated with BED ≤ 200â¯Gy were more likely to experience AUA BCR (22.5% vs. 12.4%, OR 1.44, p < 0.001) and Phoenix BCR (14.3% and 8.3%, OR 1.37, p < 0.001) than patients treated with a BED > 200â¯Gy. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the Phoenix definition, the AUA definition of BCR after brachytherapy is associated with significantly worse BCRFS for the first 15 years after treatment. Receiving a BED > 200, which cannot be achieved without the addition of brachytherapy, is associated with better BCRFS and CSS. Our findings reaffirm the importance of dose in the management of prostate cancer.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Anciano , Braquiterapia/métodos , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Antígeno Prostático Específico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Objectives: To determine the benefit of performing transperineal prostate mapping biopsy (TPMB) following multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to increase the identification of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) with Gleason grade group (GG) ≥ 2 and their locations outside of the PI-RADS v2 3-5 category lesions. Methods: mpMRI was performed in 80 men prior TPMB from two institutions. The mpMRI was considered clinically significant (csMRI) if it contained one or more PI-RADS 3-5 category lesion. mpMRI findings were compared against csPCa diagnosed by TPMB, performed between 16 November 2010, and 13 September 2019, for the entire gland, both lobes and to the right and left anterior and right and left posterior quadrants (RA, LA, RP and LP). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV), accuracy and the area under curve (AUC) were determined. Thirteen men also underwent radical prostatectomy and had comparison of TPMB pathology to prostatectomy specimen grading. Results: TPMB was positive in 60/80 (75%) of which 32 (53.3%) were csPCa. csPCa was present in the RA in 9 (11.3%), LA in 11 (13.8%), RP in 25 (31.3%) and LP in 27 (33.8%) and involved 1 quadrant in 7 (21.9%), 2 quadrants in 12 (37.5%), 3 quadrants in 11 (34.4%) and all 4 quadrants in 2 (6.3%) patients; 57/80 (71.3%) men had a mpMRIs with lesions designated as PI-RADS 3 in 24 (30%), 4 in 25 (31.3%) and 5 in 8 (10%). A csMRI was present in the RA in 7 (8.8%), LA in 8 (10%), RP in 31 (38.8%) and in the LP in 29 (36.3%), which were limited to one quadrant in 39 (68.4%), 2 quadrants in 16 (28.1%), and 3 quadrants in 2 (3.5%). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were determined from the results of the TPMB and were for the entire gland 81.3%, 35.4%, 45.6% and 73.9%. There were 31 csMRIs involving the right posterior of the gland but only 25 csPCa by TPMB of which 12/31 (38.7%) were concordant for high grade disease. There were 29 men who have a csMRI in the left posterior quadrant, and 14 (48.3%) were concordant with csPCa from the TPMB. Conclusions: MpMRI should be supplemented with TPMB to correctly identify the regions of the prostate that would require ablation in men considering focal therapy.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Brachytherapy boost improves biochemical recurrence rates in men with high-risk prostate cancer (HRPC). Few data are available on whether one isotope is superior to another. We compared the oncologic and morbidity outcomes of I-125 and Pd-103 in men with HRPC receiving brachytherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Of 797 patients with HRPC, 190 (23.8%) received I-125 or 607 received Pd-103 with a median of 45 Gy of external beam irradiation. Freedom from biochemical failure (FFBF), freedom from metastases (FFMs), cause-specific survival (CSS), and morbidity were compared for the two isotopes by the ANOVA and the χ2 test with survival determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression. RESULTS: Men treated with I-125 had a higher stage (p < 0.001), biological equivalent dose (BED) (p < 0.001), and longer hormone therapy (neoadjuvant hormone therapy, p < 0.001), where men treated with Pd-103 had a higher Gleason score (GS, p < 0.001) and longer followup (median 8.3 vs. 5.3 years, p < 0.001). Ten-year FFBF, FFM, and CSS for I-125 vs. Pd-103 were 77.5 vs. 80.2% (p = 0.897), 94.7 vs. 91.9% (p = 0.017), and 95.4 vs. 91.8% (p = 0.346), respectively. Men with T3 had superior CSS (94.1 vs. 79.5%, p = 0.001) with I-125. Significant covariates by Cox regression for FFBF were prostate specific antigen (PSA), the GS, and the BED (p < 0.001), for FFM PSA (p < 0.001) and GS (p = 0.029), and for CSS PSA, the GS (p < 0.001) and the BED (p = 0.022). Prostate cancer mortality was 7/62 (15.6%) for BED ≤ 150 Gy, 18/229 (7.9%) for BED >150-200 Gy, and 20/470 (5.9%) for BED >200 Gy (p = 0.029). Long-term morbidity was not different for the two isotopes. CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy boost with I-125 and Pd-103 appears equally effective yielding 10-year CSS of over 90%. I-125 may have an advantage in T3 disease. Higher doses yield the most favorable survival.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Radioisótopos de Yodo/uso terapéutico , Paladio/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioisótopos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos Hormonales , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Calicreínas/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Clasificación del Tumor , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Antígeno Prostático Específico/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Men with Gleason grade Group (GG) 4 and 5 prostate cancer have high failure rates when treated by conventional therapy. We investigated the effect of higher radiation doses on freedom from biochemical failure (FBF) and prostate cancer mortality (cause-specific survival [CSS]) in men treated with a combination of permanent implant and external beam irradiation (EBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Three hundred twenty men with GG4 (n = 186) and 5 (n = 134) prostate cancer were treated with I-125 or Pd-103 implant followed by 45 Gy of EBRT. Radiation doses were converted to the biological equivalent dose (BED). The median age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), time on hormone therapy, BED, and followup were 69 years, 9.0 ng/mL, 9 months, 210 Gy, and 6.5 years, respectively. FBF and CSS were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method with associations determined by log rank and Cox regression. RESULTS: Ten-year FBF for GG4 vs. 5 was 77.8 vs. 61.3% (p = 0.015), and CSS was 94 vs. 79.3% (p = 0.001). Men with lower PSA had improved FBF and CSS (p < 0.001). Thirty-one of 320 died of prostate cancer of which 10/186 (5.4%) had GG4 and 21/134 (15.7%) GG5 (OR 3.3, p = 0.002). BED <200 Gy was associated with a 2.2× greater BF (p = 0.004) and 2.4× prostate cancer mortality (p = 0.020). Significant covariates on regression analysis for FBF and CSS were PSA (p = 0.014), GG (p = 0.007), BED (p = 0.009), and GG (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Survival rates for high-grade prostate cancer are favorable when diagnosed in men with lower PSA and treated with doses of BED > 200 Gy. Higher BED is achieved with a combination of I-125 (110 Gy) or Pd-103 (100 Gy) and 45 Gy EBRT.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia , Calicreínas/sangre , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Radioterapia Conformacional , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Radioisótopos de Yodo/uso terapéutico , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Paladio/uso terapéutico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Radioisótopos/uso terapéutico , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To determine if transperineal mapping biopsy (TPMB) can improve the selection of brachytherapy alone (BT) or brachytherapy boost (BTB) in men with localized prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Two hundred and eighteen men underwent TPMB with a mean of 48.6 cores retrieved. Comparisons were made between prebiopsy risk features and biopsy results to treatment choice with associations tested with ANOVA (bootstrap), χ2 test (Pearson), and linear regression. Survival estimates were tested by the Kaplan-Meier method with comparisons by log rank. RESULTS: Mean age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), prostate specific antigen density (PSAD), and prostate volume were 67.2 years, 8.1 ng/mL, 0.19, and 50.3 cc, respectively. 105 (48.2%) biopsies were positive for Gleason Group (GG) 1: 34 (32.4%), 2: 21 (20%), 3: 31 (29.5%), 4: 7 (6.7%), and 5: 12 (11.4%). The mean number of positive cores (PCs) was 7.3 (median 6, range 1-37). Men with six or more PCs had higher PSA (11.3 vs. 6.0 ng/mL, p = 0.025) and PSAD (0.34 vs. 0.13, p = 0.013). Overall brachytherapy was used in 74 (70.5%) as either monotherapy or boost therapy. Men with BTB had higher PSA (9.7 vs. 6.7 ng/mL, p = 0.029), PSAD (0.27 vs. 0.16, p = 0.007), GG (3.3 vs. 1.8, p < 0.001), more bilateral disease (75.9% vs. 55.6%, odds ratio 3.9, p = 0.008), and PCs (10.9 vs. 4.4, p < 0.001). On linear regression, only GG (p = 0.008) and PCs (p = 0.044) were associated with BTB. Biochemical-free failure at 5 years was 92.7%. CONCLUSIONS: TPMB improves the selection of patients for BTB. Men with more PCs are more likely to have BTB. Restricting the need for BTB to those with greater volume prostate cancer may reduce radiation side effects.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja Gruesa/métodos , Braquiterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Anciano , Humanos , Calicreínas/sangre , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Selección de Paciente , Próstata/patología , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Factores de Riesgo , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: We sought to determine the minimum number of transperineal prostate mapping biopsies needed to optimize the prostate cancer detection rate. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 436 men underwent transperineal prostate mapping biopsy at 2 institutions. Biopsy density was calculated as the ratio of the total number of specimens retrieved (mean 59.4) to prostate volume (mean 44.9 cc). Associations of biopsy density with prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen density, cancer diagnosis and the Gleason score were tested by ANOVA and the chi-square test. Regression analysis was done to determine factors associated with a positive transperineal prostate mapping biopsy and Gleason score 7 or higher cancer. RESULTS: Transperineal prostate mapping biopsy was positive in 299 of 436 men (68.6%). The mean number of positive cores was 7.1 (range 1 to 41) and mean biopsy density was 1.46 (range 0.39 to 3.67). The mean number of cores in positive vs negative transperineal prostate mapping biopsies was 1.61 vs 1.14 (p <0.001). Biopsy density cut points of 0.5 or less, greater than 0.5 to 1.0, greater than 1.0 to 1.5 and greater than 1.5 were associated with positive biopsy in 25%, 37.4%, 70.7% and 84.9% of patients (p <0.001). Dichotomizing biopsy density to 1.5 or less vs greater than 1.5 resulted in a positive biopsy rate of 56.4% vs 84.9% (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.3-1.7, p <0.001). More Gleason score 6 cancers were diagnosed with higher biopsy density (94 of 158 or 59.5% vs 62 of 141 or 44.9%, p = 0.007). However, the number of positive cores with Gleason score 6 was greater in men with higher biopsy density at 4.9 vs 3.6 (p = 0.036). Prostate specific antigen (p = 0.053) and biopsy density (p = 0.012) were significant on regression analysis for positive transperineal prostate mapping biopsy and Gleason score 7+ disease. CONCLUSIONS: Biopsy density greater than 1.5 increases the diagnosis of prostate cancer by 1.5 times, detects higher volume Gleason score 6 disease and should be considered the optimal sampling approach when performing transperineal prostate mapping biopsy.
Asunto(s)
Próstata/patología , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Biopsia/métodos , Biopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tamaño de los Órganos , Perineo , Antígeno Prostático EspecíficoRESUMEN
Herein, the authors compare morbidity in men who underwent both transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy and transperineal mapping biopsy (TPMB) at two institutions with extensive experience in both procedures. We also identified strategies and predictive factors to reduce morbidity for both procedures. In our study, 379 men from two institutions, of which 265 (69.9%) had a prior TRUS-guided biopsy, also had TPMB performed via a template with biopsies taken at 5-mm intervals. Men in the TRUS group had a median of 12 cores sampled whereas the TPMB group had 51.5 (range, 16-151). The median biopsy density was 1.1 core/cc prostate volume. Median age and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level were 65 years (range, 34-86) and 5.5 ng/mL (range, 0.02-118). Of these men, 11 of 265 (4.2%) who had TRUS biopsy developed urinary tract infection compared with 3 of 379 (0.79%) of those with mapping biopsy. Infection was 14.8% in TRUS biopsy group with 13 or more cores versus 2.9% in those with 12 or less (OR, 5.8; 95% CI, 1.6-21.2; P = 0.003). No men developed retention after TRUS biopsy whereas 30 of 379 (7.9%) did following TPMB. Older age, larger prostate volume (PV), and higher core number were associated with retention. On linear regression only age (P = 0.010) and PV (P = 0.016) remained as significant associations. Men older than 65 years had 12.8% versus 3.9% (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.6-8.4, P = 0.001) and PV greater than 42 cc had 13.4% versus 2.7% (OR, 5.7; 95% CI, 2.1-15.1) retention incidence. In the present study TPMB is rarely associated with infection (0.78%) but more commonly with urinary retention (7.9%). Men older than 65 years and with PV greater than 42 cc were at four to five times greater retention risk. Consideration should be given to discharging these men with a urinary catheter following TPMB.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: To describe the technique and outcomes of seminal vesicle biopsy (SVB) and permanent implantation in patients with T3b prostate cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer patients who elected brachytherapy as their treatment of choice were offered SVB for either Gleason score ≥7, prostate-specific antigen levels >10ng/mL, or clinical stage ≥T2b. Three cores were taken from both seminal vesicles at the base of the prostate using transrectal ultrasound. Patients with a positive SVB and either a negative pelvic lymph node dissection or pelvic computerized tomogram were treated with a combination of a partial implant followed by 45Gy of external beam irradiation therapy. During the seed implant, sources were positioned in the anterior wall of the seminal vesicles using intraoperative dosimetry to guide placement. Biochemical freedom from failure was determined using a definition of >0.2ng/mL. Survival was measured using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportions projections. RESULTS: Of 526 patients who underwent SVB, 52 (9.9%) were positive for prostate cancer invasion. Clinical stage, prostate-specific antigen levels, and Gleason score were all predictive of a positive SVB (p<0.001). The 10-year biochemical freedom from failure was 64%. Cox regression demonstrated Gleason score (p=0.044) and biologic effective dose (p=0.013) as significant. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with pathologically confirmed seminal vesicle involvement of prostate cancer can be successfully identified and managed by a combined approach of permanent seed implantation to the prostate and seminal vesicles followed by external beam irradiation therapy. SVB should be encouraged in men with high-risk prostate cancer and aggressively treated when encountered.
Asunto(s)
Braquiterapia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Vesículas Seminales/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Clasificación del Tumor , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Radiografía , Vesículas Seminales/diagnóstico por imagen , Vesículas Seminales/cirugía , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
Low-dose rate brachytherapy has become a mainstream treatment option for men diagnosed with prostate cancer because of excellent long-term treatment outcomes in low-, intermediate-, and high-risk patients. Largely due to patient lead advocacy for minimally invasive treatment options, high-quality prostate implants have become widely available in the US, Europe, and Japan. The reason that brachytherapy results are reproducible in several different practice settings is because numerous implant quality factors have been defined over the last 20 years, which can be applied objectively to judge the success of the intervention both during and after the procedure. In addition, recent long-term follow-up studies have clarified that the secondary cancer incidence of brachytherapy is not clinically meaningful. In terms of future directions, the study of radiation repair genetics may allow for the counseling physician to better estimate any given patients risk for side effects, thereby substantially reducing the therapeutic uncertainties faced by patients choosing a prostate cancer intervention.