Prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infections in Argentina; comparison with England, Wales, Northern Ireland and South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Prevalence surveillance methodology is the systematic observation of the occurrence and distribution of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) so that appropriate actions can be taken. AIM: The objectives of a prevalence survey with an international validated methodology were to determine the prevalence of HCAIs for the first time in Argentina, and to provide data which could be used for international benchmarking. METHODS: In 2008, an HCAI prevalence survey was carried out in 39 hospitals in seven of 23 provinces in Argentina, with methodology identical to that employed by the Hospital Infection Society in the third prevalence survey of HCAIs in acute hospitals in the British Isles. Data collected were processed and analysed at the Northern Ireland Healthcare-Associated Infection Surveillance Centre at Belfast. FINDINGS: A total of 4249 patients were surveyed; 480 of these had at least one HCAI, resulting in a prevalence of 11.3% of patients. Male prevalence was 13.6% and female 9.0%. The most common HCAIs were pneumonia (3.3%), urinary tract infection (3.1%), surgical site infection (2.9%), primary bloodstream infection (1.5%), and soft tissue infections (1.2%). Among the 1027 patients who underwent surgery, the prevalence of surgical site infection was 10.2%. The prevalence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was 1.1%, accounting for 10.0% of all HCAI isolates. The results for Argentina show higher HCAI rates compared with corresponding findings for England, Wales, Northern Ireland and South Africa. CONCLUSION: This survey will contribute to the prioritization of resources and help to inform Departments of Health and hospitals in the continuing effort to reduce HCAIs.

Four country healthcare-associated infection prevalence survey: pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infections.

In 2006, the Hospital Infection Society was funded by the respective health services in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland to conduct a prevalence survey of healthcare-associated infection (HCAI). Here, we report the prevalence of pneumonia and lower respiratory tract infection other than pneumonia (LRTIOP) in these four countries. The prevalence of all HCAIs was 7.59% (5743 out of 75 694). Nine hundred (15.7%) of these infections were pneumonia, and 402 (7.0%) were LRTIOP. The prevalence of both infections was higher for males than for females, and increased threefold from those aged <35 to those aged >85 years (P<0.001). At the time of the survey or in the preceding seven days, 23.7% and 18.2% of patients with pneumonia and LRTIOP, respectively, were mechanically ventilated compared to 5.2% of patients in the whole study population. Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was the cause of pneumonia and LRTIOP in 7.6% and 18.1% of patients, respectively (P<0.001). More patients with LRTIOP (4.2%) had concurrent diarrhoea due to Clostridium difficile compared to patients with pneumonia (2.4%), but this did not reach statistical significance. Other HCAIs were present in 137 (15.2%) of patients with pneumonia and 66 (16.4%) of those with LRTIOP. The results suggest that reducing instrumentation, such as mechanical ventilation where possible, should help reduce infection. The higher prevalence of MRSA as a cause of LRTIOP suggests a lack of specificity in identifying the microbial cause and the association with C. difficile emphasises the need for better use of antibiotics.

Hospital infection society prevalence survey of Healthcare Associated Infection 2006: comparison of results between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.

As part of the Third Healthcare Associated Infection (HCAI) Prevalence Survey of the United Kingdom and Ireland, HCAI point prevalence surveys were carried out in Northern Ireland (NI) and the Republic of Ireland (RoI). Here we explore the potential benefits of comparing results from two countries with different healthcare systems, which employed similar methodologies and identical HCAI definitions. Forty-four acute adult hospitals in the RoI and 15 in NI participated with a total of 11 185 patients surveyed (NI 3644 patients and RoI 7541). The overall HCAI prevalence was 5.4 and 4.9 in NI and the RoI, respectively. There was no significant difference in prevalence rates of HCAI, device-related HCAI or HCAI associated with bloodstream infection but there was a difference in meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus-related HCAI (P = 0.02) between the two countries. There were significantly more urinary tract infections and Clostridium difficile infections recorded in NI (P = 0.002 and P < 0.001). HCAIs were more prevalent in patients aged >65 years and in the intensive care unit in both countries. HCAIs were also more prevalent if patients were mechanically ventilated, had had recent non-implant surgery (RoI) or had more recorded HCAI risk factors. This is the first time that HCAI prevalence rates have been directly compared between NI and the RoI. By closely examining similarities and differences between HCAI prevalence rates in both countries it is hoped that this will influence healthcare planning and at the same time reassure the public that HCAI is important and that measures are being taken to combat it.

Four country healthcare associated infection prevalence survey 2006: risk factor analysis.

Point prevalence surveys are useful in detecting changes in the pattern of healthcare-associated infection (HCAI). In 2004 the Hospital Infection Society was asked to conduct a third national prevalence survey, which included England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. A similar but not identical survey was carried out in Scotland. Data were collected on standardised forms using Centres for Disease Control and Prevention definitions. This report considers associations with a wide range of risk factors for all HCAI and for four main categories. The overall prevalence rate of HCAI was 7.6% and increased significantly with age. All risk factors considered were associated with highly significantly increased risk of HCAI, except recent peripheral IV catheter and other bladder instrumentation use. Primary bloodstream infection (PBSI) was associated with antibiotic, central intravenous catheter and parenteral nutrition use. Pneumonia was associated with antibiotic, central catheter, parenteral nutrition use, mechanical ventilation and current peripheral catheter use. Surgical site infection was associated with recent surgery, antibiotic and central catheter use, mechanical ventilation and parenteral nutrition. Urinary instrumentation and antibiotic use were associated with urinary tract infection. Patients under a critical care medicine consultant had the highest prevalence of HCAI (23.2%). This report highlights those areas requiring attention to prevent HCAI, i.e. device-related infections such as PBSI (e.g. central catheters) and pneumonia (e.g. mechanical ventilation) and should influence protocols for future prevalence surveys of HCAI, e.g. the recording of risk factors at the time of assessment only is sufficient.

Four country healthcare associated infection prevalence survey 2006: overview of the results.

A survey of adult patients was conducted in February 2006 to May 2006 in acute hospitals across England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland to estimate the prevalence of healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs). A total of 75 694 patients were surveyed; 5743 of these had HCAIs, giving a prevalence of 7.59% (95% confidence interval: 7.40-7.78). HCAI prevalence in England was 8.19%, in Wales 6.35%, in Northern Ireland 5.43% and in the Republic of Ireland 4.89%. The most common HCAI system infections were gastrointestinal (20.6% of all HCAI), urinary tract (19.9%), surgical site (14.5%), pneumonia (14.1%), skin and soft tissue (10.4%) and primary bloodstream (7.0%). Prevalence of MRSA was 1.15% with MRSA being the causative organism in 15.8% of all system infections. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile was 1.21%. This was the largest HCAI prevalence survey ever performed in the four countries. The methodology and organisation used is a template for future HCAI surveillance initiatives, nationally, locally or at unit level. Information obtained from this survey will contribute to the prioritisation of resources and help to inform Departments of Health, hospitals and other relevant bodies in the continuing effort to reduce HCAI.

Prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infections: what do they tell us, if anything?

Prevalence surveys of healthcare-associated infections offer advantages over incidence surveys, including the relative ease of performance, a reduced requirement for resources, the ability to include increased numbers of hospitals within a shorter period of time, and the possibility of more rapid data analysis and feedback. Prevalence surveys have also been shown to be useful in monitoring the effectiveness of infection control programmes. Prevalence surveys appear to be desirable when financial support, and/or the will to carry out incidence surveys, is lacking. However, it is imperative that prevalence surveys use standardised methodology and internationally recognised definitions of infection.

Survey of operating theatre ventilation facilities for minimally invasive surgery in Great Britain and Northern Ireland: current practice and considerations for the future.

Increasing use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and other invasive procedures has raised the question of what ventilation facilities are appropriate for such procedures to prevent infection. The Hospital Infection Society (HIS) Working Party on Infection Control in Operating Theatres undertook a survey of practice in Great Britain and Northern Ireland on the ventilation facilities provided for a variety of MIS and other procedures. Five hundred and fifty questionnaires were forwarded to HIS members, and 186 (39%) replies were received. Fifty-eight percent were from district general hospitals (DGHs). Designated theatres for orthopaedic surgery (although not necessarily ultraclean ventilated theatres) were available in more than 80% of hospitals, with approximately 50% of hospitals having designated theatres for a variety of other surgical subspecialities. Approximately two-thirds of urological procedures were performed in conventionally ventilated operating theatres. Most radiological procedures were performed in non-ventilated theatres or treatment rooms. In around half of the DGHs and university/referral hospitals, orthopaedic MIS procedures such as arthroscopy were performed in ultraclean ventilated theatres. This survey revealed considerable variation in the use of conventionally ventilated theatres and ultraclean ventilated theatres. In particular, many radiological and anaesthetic procedures are performed in treatment rooms or ventilated rooms with less than 20 air changes per hour. Whilst it is not clear whether this is acceptable practice given current knowledge, large-scale clinical trials to determine what standards of ventilation are appropriate to minimize infection for these types of procedures would be difficult to conduct. Research is needed on the relative risk of airborne infection for a variety of procedures, including whether all prosthetic implant procedures should be carried out in ultraclean ventilated theatres, as infection associated with implants is often of airborne origin and of considerable clinical significance.