Triple Jeopardy in Oral Health: Additive Effects of Immigrant Status, Education, and Neighborhood.

PURPOSE: To estimate the additive effects of parent's nativity status/language spoken at country of birth, education, and area-level socioeconomic status (SES) on untreated dental caries among children aged 5 to 9 y in Australia. METHODS: Cross-sectional population-based data were obtained from the 2014 National Child Oral Health Study (N = 12,140). Indicators of social position used to explore additive effects on dental caries included nativity status, language, university degree, and neighborhood socioeconomic level. Multiple-way interactions were examined, and departure from additivity resulting from 2- and 3-way interactions were estimated as relative excess risk due to interaction (RERI). RESULTS: Children marginalized across multiple layers of disadvantage had substantially higher frequencies of dental caries compared with children in the most advantaged category. RERI for the 3-way interaction between immigrant status, education, and neighborhood SES was negative (RERI3: -0.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -1.68, 1.40). When operationalizing language, education, and neighborhood SES, the joint effect of the 3 marginalized positions was additive (RERI3: 0.43; 95% CI: -2.08, 2.95). CONCLUSION: Children marginalized across multiple intersecting axes of disadvantage bear the greatest burden of dental caries, with frequencies surpassing the cumulative effect of each social position alone. Findings emphasize the need to account for intersecting inequities and their oral health effects among children with immigrant backgrounds. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: Our analysis underscores the necessity for policies and public health strategies targeting dental caries-related inequities to comprehensively account for various indicators of social disadvantage, particularly encompassing language proficiency, educational attainment, and neighborhood socioeconomic status. Within the intricate interplay of these factors, we identify a vulnerable subgroup comprising children with the highest prevalence of dental decay. Therefore, prioritizing this specific demographic should be the focal point of policies and public health initiatives aimed at fostering equitable oral health outcomes.

Associations and discrepancies between global self-ratings of oral health and general health: a Bayesian approach.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the discrepancies between global ratings of oral health and general health and investigate the factors associated with self-rated oral health (SROH) and self-rated general health (SRGH). METHODS: Data were collected from 502 participants aged 18 to 81 years. A structured questionnaire was used to obtain data regarding sociodemographic characteristics and self-reported conditions. Global self-ratings of oral health and general health were the main outcomes. Discrepancies between self-ratings of oral health and general health were stratified by independent variables. Bayesian ordinal logistic regression models were fitted to estimate the posterior distributions of parameters and 95% credible intervals (95% CrI). RESULTS: The proportion of participants who rated their oral health worse than general health was 28.6% (95% CrI: 24.7-32.3). Negative discrepancies between SROH and SRGH were associated with being men, reporting gingivitis, and lower income. Sex (95% CrI: 1.12-2.25) impacted only on SRGH. Income (SROH - 95% CrI: 1.52-6.40; SRGH - 95% CrI: 1.08-4.56), tertiary education (SROH - 95% CrI: 1.13-2.53; SRGH - 95% CrI: 1.01-2.32), self-reported missing teeth (SROH - 95% CrI: 1.57-3.46; SRGH - 95% CrI: 2.21-4.92), self-reported gingivitis (SROH - 95% CrI: 1.10-2.40; SRGH - 95% CrI: 1.71-3.82), and self-reported chronic health problem (SROH - 95% CrI: 1.38-3.08; SRGH - 95% CrI: 1.61-3.59) impacted on both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial discrepancies between self-rated oral health and self-rated general health were found and were associated with being male, reporting gingivitis, and having lower income.

Immigrants experience oral health care inequity: findings from Australia's National Study of Adult Oral Health.

BACKGROUND: Oral health service utilization contributes to positive oral health and indicates realised access to services. The study aimed to describe patterns of oral health service use among overseas-born and Australian-born populations and assess equity in access to services. METHODS: The study used data from Australia's National Study of Adult Oral Health 2017-2018 and was guided by the Aday and Andersen framework of access to health and Australia's National Oral Health Plan. Descriptive analyses of service use by perceived need, enabling and predisposing factors were compared between four groups: Australian-born and overseas-born who mainly speak English and Australian-born and overseas-born who mainly speak a language other than English. RESULTS: Overseas-born who mainly speak a language other than English experienced greater oral health care inequity, largely driven by financial difficulty (avoided care due to cost: 42% vs 27%-28%; avoided/delayed visiting due to cost: 48% vs. 37%-38%; cost prevented treatment: 32% vs. 18%-24%). The most favourable visiting patterns were among the Australian-born population who speak a language other than English. CONCLUSIONS: The study shows clear inequity experienced among immigrants in accessibility as measured through indicators of oral health care utilization and factors related to inequity, such as the ability to pay for services.

A Psychometric Network Analysis of OHIP-14 across Australian and Brazilian Populations.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the structural validity of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) instrument in Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations from Australia and Brazil using a network analysis approach. METHODS: Cross-sectional data collected using OHIP-14 were obtained for Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations from Australia and Brazil. Networks were estimated using the Gaussian graphical model. Items of the OHIP-14 instrument are represented as nodes and the partial correlations between items as edges. Dimensionality was assessed using exploratory graph analysis. Structural consistency and item stability were computed using a bootstrap sampling method. Standardized node strength across each dimension was also calculated. RESULTS: Four dimensions were identified across all samples, although the item arrangement of most dimensions presented variation. Similarities with the theoretical domains of the instrument were found. Items from the conceptually derived OHIP-14 domains formed separated clusters or blended with other items in a single dimension. Most dimensions across all samples showed an acceptable structural consistency. Item stability revealed some discrepancies among items of dimensions of both Indigenous networks. CONCLUSION: The psychometric network perspective adopted in this study provides validation of the OHIP-14 structure in Indigenous and non-Indigenous populations. The structural consistency and item stability analyses showed that both Indigenous networks present a higher number of cross-domain items and less defined boundaries between dimensions. These findings indicate that OHIP-14 does not measure attributes in the same extent among different cultures. KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER STATEMENT: This study demonstrates a new analytical framework from which to conceptualize and interpret the construct oral health-related quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14). Network graphs facilitate knowledge translation of findings to professionals with no expertise in psychometric methods. OHIP-14 is a valuable tool to oral health research and clinical practice. Differences in conceptions of health may influence the extent that the instrument measures oral health impacts. Consequently, dimension scores do not always provide appropriate measures and should be avoided in research reports and assessments of treatment outcomes.

[Protection of mice by trehalose dimycolate against lethal infection by Trypanosoma cruzi]. / Protection de souris par le dimycolate de tréhalose (tdm) contre une infection létale par Trypanosoma cruzi.

Four weekly injections of 50 micrograms of trehalose dimycolate (TDM) in FIA protect 40% of the Mice against a lethal infection by Trypanosoma cruzi; under the same conditions MDP (muramyldipeptide) has only a very slight effect.

Imunologia da paracoccidiodomicose. / Immunology of paracoccidioidomycosis

Estudos imunologicos foram realizados em 16 pacientes adultos, de ambos os sexos, acometidos de paracoccidioidomicose. Dentre os achados mais importantes figuram os teores elevados de IgG, a baixa do 3o. componente do complemento, a presenca de anticorpos precipitantes e hemaglutinantes contra a paracoccidioidina, a presenca de complexos imunes circulantes, baixos teores de linfocitos T circulantes, teores normais de linfocitos T supressores e hiporreatividade dos linfocitos T a fitohemaglutinina e a paracoccidioidina.A histologia das reacoes cutaneas a paracoccidioidina acusou um aspecto semelhante ao da reacao de Arthus, com o maximo de intensidade do eritema em 24 horas, a presenca de vasculite e a infiltracao predominante por polimorfonucleares