Relationship between the adjuvant and cytotoxic effects of the positive charges and polymerization in liposomes.

Vaccine development today encounters a main obstacle, which is the need for effective adjuvants suitable for clinical trials. Aluminum salts, discovered 70 years ago and, very recently, MF59, are the only types of adjuvants currently used in vaccines licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Liposomes represent an alternative approach to vaccine adjuvants. In this article, we describe the inflammatory response and biological effect of polymerization and the addition of positive charges in liposome formulations. Nonpolymerized cationic (NP(+)) liposomes significantly reduce metabolism in Vero cells after 24 hours. Correspondingly, both NP(+) and polymerized cationic (P(+)) liposomes reduce cell viability following a 48-hour incubation. Similar results were obtained with cells from the peritoneal cavities of mice. Paradoxically, those liposomes that presented clearly cytostatic or cytotoxic effects in vitro stimulated metabolism and had a mitogenic effect in vivo. Finally, the adjuvant effect was tested by immunization in BALB/c mice. The major effect was obtained with NP(+) liposomes. Accordingly, we also demonstrated that NP(+) liposomes injected into the dermis produced an outstanding inflammatory reaction, showing the histopathological characteristics of an inoculation granuloma. Thus, positive charge would play an important role in the immunoadjuvant effect of liposomes by conferring them cytotoxic capacity.

Biodistribution of liposome/DNA systems after subcutaneous and intraperitoneal inoculation.

In this work, we analyzed protein interaction, cell toxicity, and biodistribution of liposome formulation for further possible applications as DNA vehicles in gene-therapy protocols. In relation to protein interaction, cationic liposomes showed the lowest protein interaction, but this parameter was incremented with DNA association. On the other hand, noncharged liposomes presented high protein interaction, but DNA association decreased this parameter. Protein interaction of polymeric liposomes did not change with DNA association. Cell toxicity of these three liposome formulations was low, cell death became present at concentrations higher than 0.5 mg/mL, and these concentrations were higher than those usually used in transfection assays. In the case of noncharged and polymeric liposomes, toxicity increased upon interaction with serum proteins. DNA/liposome-mediated tissue distribution was analyzed in Balb-c female mice. Results indicated that noncharged liposomes were able to deliver DNA to liver after intraperitoneal (i.p.) inoculation, while polymeric liposomes were able to deliver DNA to kidney by using the same inoculation route. Cationic liposomes were able to deliver DNA to a wide range of tissues by the i.p. route (e.g., liver, intestine, kidney, and blood). After subcutaneous inoculation, only cationic liposomes were able to deliver DNA to blood, but not the other two formulations within the detection limits of the method.

Antitumoral effect of IL-12 gene transfected via liposomes into B16F0 cells.

Murine melanoma B16F0 cells were transfected with SA:DPPC:DOPE (2:1:1 molar ratio) liposomes associated with a plasmid encoding murine IL-12. Stearylamine, a cationic lipid, showed a greater transfection efficiency compared to DOTAP-containing liposomes. The lipid:DNA ratio was 2:1 (w/w). Control groups were mock transfected or transfected with an empty plasmid (pNeo). pNeo or IL-12 transfected cells and controls were inoculated intradermically into the dorsal region of the foot or the lateral flank of C57BL6 mice. Results showed that IL-12 expression had a marked effect on in vivo growth of B16 melanoma tumors developed in both anatomic sites, significantly retarding their growth and prolonging host survival.

Alternative site of implantation affects tumor malignancy and metastatic potential in mice: its comparison to the flank model.

MC-C fibrosarcoma and B16F0 melanoma tumors were implanted intradermally in the dorsal region of the foot of mice. Tumor progression was compared to standard implantation in the flank. Although foot tumors only reached 13% (MC-C) and 25% (B16F0) of the mean volume of flank tumors, a more malignant phenotype in terms of histology and survival rate was observed in this type of tumors. Moreover, lung metastases were only detected in hosts bearing foot tumors, in contrast to MC-C and B16F0 populations with tumors growing in the flank. In addition, cellular influx and local immune reaction were higher in the dorsal region of the foot. According to our results, the dermis of the flank allows excessive tumor growth due to its low reactivity. Thus, differences in innate and adaptive immune effectors between the evaluated tumor microenvironments would account for the differences in tumor malignancy. Due to its striking differences with the standard flank inoculation, the tumor implantation model herein introduced could be a valuable tool to study the metastatic potential of different cell lines and the microenvironment components affecting tumor growth.

Liposome/DNA systems: correlation between association, hydrophobicity and cell viability.

Small unilamellar vesicles associated with plasmid DNA showed maximum association efficiency for a cationic mixture of egg phosphatidylcholine (EPC):1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DOPE):di-1,2-dioleoyl-3-trimethyl ammonium propane (DOTAP) (16:8:1 molar ratio) [65%], followed by neutral lipids EPC:1,2-dimyristoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine (DMPE):cholesterol (Chol) (2:2:1 molar ratio) [30%], and a polymerized formulation 1,2-bis(10,12-tricosadiynoyl)sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DC8,9PC):DMPE:Chol (2:2:1 molar ratio) [11%]. The hydrophobicity factor (HF) for these formulations followed the trend DC8,9PC:DMPE:CHOL < EPC:DMPE:Chol < EPC:DOPE DOTAP, and DNA association did not alter this trend. Results suggest that the higher the HF value, the more fluid the membrane and the higher the efficiency of DNA association. On the other hand, no differences were observed in cell toxicity with lipids up to 1 mg/ml in VERO cells.