Haemodynamic or metabolic stimulation tests to reveal the renal functional response: requiem or revival?

Renal stimulation tests document the dynamic response of the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) after a single or a combination of stimuli, such as an intravenous infusion of dopamine or amino acids or an oral protein meal. The increment of the GFR above the unstimulated state has formerly been called the renal functional reserve (RFR). Although the concept of a renal reserve capacity has not withstood scientific scrutiny, the literature documenting renal stimulation merits renewed interest. An absent or a blunted response of the GFR after a stimulus indicates lost or diseased nephrons. This information is valuable in preventing, diagnosing and prognosticating acute kidney injury and pregnancy-related renal events as well as chronic kidney disease. However, before renal function testing is universally practiced, some shortcomings must be addressed. First, a common nomenclature should be decided upon. The expression of RFR should be replaced by renal functional response. Second, a simple protocol must be developed and propagated. Third, we suggest designing prospective studies linking a defective stimulatory response to emergence of renal injury biomarkers, to histological or morphological renal abnormalities and to adverse renal outcomes in different renal syndromes.

Randomized, clinical trial comparison of trisodium citrate 30% and heparin as catheter-locking solution in hemodialysis patients.

Interdialytic hemodialysis catheter-locking solutions could contribute to a reduction of catheter-related complications, especially infections. However, they can cause side effects because of leakage from the tip of the catheter. Recently, trisodium citrate (TSC) has been advocated because of its antimicrobial properties and local anticoagulation. In a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial, TSC 30% was compared with unfractionated heparin 5000 U/ml for prevention of catheter-related infections, thrombosis, and bleeding complications. The study was stopped prematurely because of a difference in catheter-related bacteremia (CRB; P < 0.01). Of 363 eligible patients, 291 could be randomized. The study included 98 tunneled cuffed catheters and 193 untunneled. There were no significant differences in patient and catheter characteristics on inclusion. In the heparin group, 46% of catheters had to be removed because of any complication compared with 28% in the TSC group (P = 0.005). CRB rates were 1.1 per 1000 catheter-days for TSC versus 4.1 in the heparin group (P < 0.001). For tunneled cuffed catheters, the risk reduction for CRB was 87% (P < 0.001) and for untunneled catheters was 64% (P = 0.05). Fewer patients died from CRB in the TSC group (0 versus 5; P = 0.028). There were no differences in catheter flow problems and thrombosis (P = 0.75). No serious adverse events were encountered. Major bleeding episodes were significantly lower in the TSC group (P = 0.010). TSC 30% improves overall patency rates and reduces catheter-related infections and major bleeding episodes for both tunneled and untunneled hemodialysis catheters. Flow problems are not reduced.

The value of tuberculin skin testing in haemodialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: Chronic haemodialysis patients are at increased risk for developing tuberculosis (TB). Appropriate screening methods to detect latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are required. The aim of this prospective multi-centre study was to evaluate the tuberculin skin test (TST) as a screening method for detection of M.tuberculosis infection in haemodialysis patients. METHODS: A total of 224 patients in two haemodialysis centres were prospectively tested, using 2 units of tuberculin PPD RT23. Up to three booster injections were given with a 7 day interval to patients not responding to the previous test. The results were compared with clinical and radiological data. RESULTS: The cumulative prevalence of a positive TST was 14.7% for the first test, 27.8% for the second test and 32.6% for the fourth test. There was no influence of age, gender, haemodialysis centre, dialysis efficiency, nutritional state, levels of zinc, vitamin D therapy, primary renal disease, (previous or active) immunosuppressive therapy or response to hepatitis B vaccination. There was a significant, but weak, correlation between TST positivity and a history of positive TST or TB. Chest radiography and positive TST were not correlated, yet a positive chest X-ray increased the detection of patients with latent M.tuberculosis infection up to 47.8%. CONCLUSIONS: In haemodialysis patients, a positive response of >30% to repeated TST was obtained. Two consecutive TSTs were sufficient to recruit most of the booster reactions. Since only a weak correlation was found with anamnestic data, regular TST evaluation in combination with a chest X-ray, is a useful tool to detect infection with M.tuberculosis in haemodialysis patients.