Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
1.
Acad Radiol ; 26(2): 163-169, 2019 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29934019

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the implementation of radiation dose monitoring software, create a process for clinical follow-up and documentation of high-dose cases, and quantify the number of patient reported radiation-induced tissue reactions in fluoroscopically guided interventional radiology (IR) and neuro-interventional radiology (NIR) procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Web-based radiation dose monitoring software was installed at our institution and a process to flag all procedures with reference point air kerma (Ka,r) > 5000 mGy was implemented. The entrance skin dose was estimated and formal reports generated, allowing for physician-initiated clinical follow-up. To evaluate our process, we reviewed all IR and NIR procedures performed at our hospital over a 1-year period. For all procedures with Ka,r > 5000 mGy, retrospective medical chart review was performed to evaluate for patient reported tissue reactions. RESULTS: Three thousand five hundred eighty-two procedures were performed over the 1-year period. The software successfully transferred dose data on 3363 (93.9%) procedures. One thousand three hundred ninety-three (368 IR and 1025 NIR) procedures were further analyzed after excluding 2189 IR procedures with Ka,r < 2000 mGy. Ten of 368 (2.7%) IR and 52 of 1025 (5.1%) NIR procedures exceeded estimated skin doses of 5000 mGy. All 10 IR cases were abdominal/pelvic trauma angiograms with/without embolization; there were no reported tissue reactions. Of 52 NIR cases, 49 were interventions and 3 were diagnostic angiograms. Five of 49 (10.2%) NIR patients reported skin/hair injuries, all of which were temporary. CONCLUSION: Software monitoring and documentation of radiation dose in interventional procedures can be successfully implemented. Radiation-induced tissue reactions are relatively uncommon.


Asunto(s)
Dosis de Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación , Radiología Intervencionista/métodos , Programas Informáticos , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Monitoreo de Radiación/instrumentación , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Monitoreo de Radiación/normas , Salud Radiológica , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 203(3): 630-6, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25148168

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The displayed air kerma during a fluoroscopy-guided procedure often does not represent the entrance skin dose. The purpose of this work is to develop a system-specific air kerma-to-entrance skin dose look-up table (LUT) for immediate reference and to evaluate its clinical utility. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Physicists are often involved in retrospective dosimetry and risk estimates. Conservative dosimetry conversion factors, represented by the total conversion factor, prospectively estimate the maximum potential skin dose from the displayed air kerma. Air kerma-to-skin dose LUTs with corresponding tissue reactions and approximate time-of-onset can be posted for reference. By developing skin dose LUTs, physicians can actively evaluate during the procedure the potential for deterministic skin reactions. System user surveys evaluated the impact of LUTs on dose awareness. RESULTS: The range of the total conversion factor to the displayed air kerma for the nine systems evaluated was 0.8-1.6 for frontal x-ray tubes. Skin dose LUTs were posted in all imaging suites, and two surveys reported user feedback. Radiology technologists indicated that LUTs improved user dose awareness. Twelve of 14 physician respondents indicated an understanding that entrance skin dose is not equal to the displayed air kerma. CONCLUSION: Our efforts focused on educating fluoroscopy users about differences between displayed air kerma and the entrance skin dose while increasing dose awareness using an accessible and easy-to-understand tool. Skin dose LUTs provide physicians and staff an immediate reference for the maximum estimated entrance skin dose and the associated deterministic skin effects, allowing appropriate patient management.


Asunto(s)
Fluoroscopía , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Salud Radiológica/educación , Radiología/educación , Radiometría/métodos , Piel/efectos de la radiación , Estadística como Asunto , Algoritmos , Concienciación , Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Humanos , Dosis de Radiación , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Fenómenos Fisiológicos de la Piel , Texas
3.
Acad Radiol ; 21(10): 1233-9, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25086952

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the impact of incremental increases in computed tomography (CT) image noise on detection of low-contrast hypodense liver lesions. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied 50 CT examinations acquired at image noise index (NI) of 15 and hypodense liver lesions and 50 examinations with no lesions. Validation of a noise addition tool to be used in the evaluation of the CT examinations was performed with a liver phantom. Using this tool, three 100-image sets were assembled: an NI of 17.4 (simulating 75% of the original patient radiation dose), 21.2 (simulating 50% dose), and 29.7 (simulating 25%). Three readers scored certainty of lesion presence using a five-point Likert scale. RESULTS: For original images (NI 15) plus images with NI of 17.4 and 21.2, sensitivity was >90% threshold (range, 95%-98%). For images with NI of 29.7, sensitivity was just below the threshold (89%). Reader Az values for receiver operating characteristic curves were good for original, NI 17.4, and NI 21.2 images (0.976, 0.973, and 0.96, respectively). For NI of 29.7, the Az decreased to 0.913. Detection sensitivity was <90% for both lesion size < 10 mm (85%) and lesion-to-liver contrast <60 Hounsfield units (85%) only at NI 29.7. CONCLUSIONS: For low-contrast lesion detection in liver CT, image noise can be increased up to NI 21.2 (a 50% patient radiation dose reduction) without substantial reduction in sensitivity.


Asunto(s)
Artefactos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Humanos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Relación Señal-Ruido
4.
Neurosurgery ; 72(4): 566-72, 2013 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23269458

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The incidence of radiation-induced complications is increasingly part of the informed consent process for patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures. Data guiding these discussions in the era of modern radiation-minimizing equipment is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the rates of skin and hair effects at a modern high-volume neurovascular center, and to assess the feasibility of accurately quantifying the risk of future central nervous system (CNS) tumor formation. METHODS: We reviewed a prospectively collected database of endovascular procedures performed at our institution in 2008. The entrance skin dose and brain dose were calculated. Patients receiving skin doses >2 Gy were contacted to inquire about skin and hair changes. We reviewed several recent publications from leading radiation physics bodies to evaluate the feasibility of accurately predicting future cancer risk from neurointerventional procedures. RESULTS: Seven hundred two procedures were included in the study. Of the patients receiving >2 Gy, 39.6% reported subacute skin or hair changes following their procedure, of which 30% were permanent. Increasing skin dose was significantly associated with permanent hair loss. We found substantial methodological difficulties in attempting to model the risk of future CNS tumor formation given the gaps in our current understanding of the brain's susceptibility to low-dose ionizing radiation. CONCLUSION: Radiation exposures exceeding 2 Gy are common in interventional neuroradiology despite modern radiation-minimizing technology. The incidence of side effects approaches 40%, although the majority is self-limiting. Gaps in current models of brain tumor formation after exposure to radiation preclude accurately quantifying the risk of future CNS tumor formation.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/efectos adversos , Dosis de Radiación , Enfermedades de la Piel/diagnóstico , Piel/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias Encefálicas/epidemiología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Predicción , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Enfermedades de la Piel/epidemiología
5.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 197(2): 437-41, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21785091

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the upper limit of noise for detection of small low-contrast lesions in a liver phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A CT liver phantom containing 21 low-contrast, low-attenuation, circular simulated lesions ranging in size from 2.4 to 10 mm was scanned 23 times at different tube current ranges (varying noise index) on a 64-MDCT scanner with automatic tube current modulation. The attenuation of the simulated lesions was 20 HU less than that of the liver-equivalent background. Three radiologists independently reviewed the resultant CT images, which contained either a low-contrast lesion or no lesion and scored certainty of lesion detection using a 4-point Likert scale. Overall performance was evaluated by sensitivity analysis with receiver operator curve and area under the curve (A(z)) computation for ranges of noise index. RESULTS: The reviewers achieved 100% sensitivity with a noise index of 15 or less for lesions measuring 6.3-10.0 mm (A(z) = 0.96). Increasing noise index to the 17-21 range resulted in a minor decrease in sensitivity and overall performance (sensitivity, 92.3%; A(z) = 0.93). A further increase in noise index to the 23-27 range resulted in a moderate decrease in sensitivity (sensitivity, 81.4%; A(z) = 0.77). Beyond the noise index 23-27 range, sensitivity dropped markedly from 81.4% to 39%. Agreement between the three readers in assessing the image sets was moderate. CONCLUSION: For detection of small low-contrast lesions in the liver phantom model used in this study, the upper limit of noise index may be in the 15-21 range for sensitivity greater than 90%.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Fantasmas de Imagen , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral/métodos , Algoritmos , Área Bajo la Curva , Humanos , Curva ROC , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
6.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 8(4): 242-50, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21458762

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To examine variation in pediatric trauma head CT imaging protocols in Washington state. METHODS: A web-based survey was sent to trauma-designated hospitals in Washington state. Respondents were queried about pediatric head trauma volumes, type of CT scanners, and technical information about the CT imaging protocols. Variation in pediatric trauma volumes, CT dose reduction strategies, and effective dose by trauma center levels was examined. Mean head effective dose and organ dose for a female baby were estimated. RESULTS: We achieved a 76% overall response rate. Of the 2,215 children who received head CT scans, 36.3% (n=805) received head CT imaging at level 4 trauma center facilities, followed by level 1 trauma center (31.4%; n=695), level 3 trauma center (19.7%; n=436), level 2 trauma center (12%; n=267), and Level 5 (0.5%; n=12) facilities. Most responding trauma center facilities (44/47) reported having a pediatric specific imaging head CT protocols. However, compared to levels 1 and 2 trauma centers together, a greater proportion of levels 3, 4 & 5 trauma center facilities collectively lacked dose reduction strategies (0% vs. 25-57%), tended to have higher mAs (169 ± 113 vs. 110 ± 36), and were later adopters of dose reduction strategies on the CT scanners. There was more than a 10-fold variation in estimated median effective dose for a baby within level 4 trauma center facilities (3.5 ± 0.84 mSv, range 0.60 to 9.60 mSv). DISCUSSION: There is both within and between trauma center level variation in pediatric head CT imaging protocols and radiation dose in Washington state.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos Clínicos , Traumatismos Craneocerebrales/diagnóstico por imagen , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Dosis de Radiación , Protección Radiológica , Medición de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/instrumentación , Centros Traumatológicos , Washingtón
7.
Radiographics ; 30(5): 1215-29; discussion 1230-3, 2010 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20833847

RESUMEN

A recurring source of contention between clinicians and radiologists continues to be examination appropriateness when imaging pregnant patients. With the multitude of references on potential radiation risks to the fetus, radiologists tend to be cautious and hesitant about exposing the fetus to radiation. This tendency is often interpreted by referring physicians as intrusion into and delay in the care of their patients. The risk burden of radiation exposure to the fetus has to be carefully weighed against the benefits of obtaining a critical diagnosis quickly and using a single tailored imaging study. In general, there is lower than expected awareness of radiation risks to the fetus from imaging pregnant patients. Modalities that do not use ionizing radiation, such as ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging, should be the preferred examinations for evaluating an acute condition in a pregnant patient. However, no examination should be withheld when an important clinical diagnosis is under consideration. Exposure to ionizing radiation may be unavoidable, but there is no evidence to suggest that the risk to the fetus after a single imaging study and an interventional procedure is significant. All efforts should be made to minimize the exposure, with consideration of the risk versus benefit for a given clinical scenario.


Asunto(s)
Anomalías Inducidas por Radiación/prevención & control , Diagnóstico por Imagen/efectos adversos , Complicaciones del Embarazo/diagnóstico , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Embarazo
8.
Acad Radiol ; 17(6): 791-4, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20399685

RESUMEN

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We undertook this study to determine whether differences in detector-lesion distance resulted in appreciable effects on digital magnification mammography performance as measured using the American College of Radiology (ACR) mammography phantom and a line pair test pattern. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of the standard 42-mm thick standard ACR mammography phantom with a wax insert on one side containing simulated fibers, calcifications, and masses were obtained on a Senographe Essential digital mammography system with the phantom in upright and inverted positions. The process was repeated with a line pair test pattern for measuring resolution. All images were obtained in contact mode, and with 1.5x and 1.8x magnification, and evaluated on a GE PACS monitor. RESULTS: Overall, changing lesion-detector distance using standard versus inverted positioning did not appreciably increase the number of objects seen on the ACR phantom under all modes. No greater than one line pair difference was seen in standard versus inverted positioning. At 1.8x magnification mode, no difference was detected in line pair resolution with a change in positioning. CONCLUSION: Differences in lesion-detector distance as modeled using both the ACR mammography phantom and a line pair test pattern did not make an appreciable difference in digital magnification mammography performance.


Asunto(s)
Algoritmos , Artefactos , Neoplasias de la Mama/diagnóstico por imagen , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Fantasmas de Imagen , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/instrumentación , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
9.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 193(6): 1621-8, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19933657

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this study was to determine the radiation dose received during diagnostic and interventional neuroangiographic procedures in a group of pediatric patients. A second goal was to approximate the total average radiation dose from all angiographic and CT studies that pediatric patients underwent during the study period and to estimate the increased risk of cancer incidence in this patient group. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study subjects were pediatric patients who had undergone one or more neuroangiographic procedures at Harborview Medical Center between December 1, 2004, and April 30, 2008. Recorded radiation doses were converted to entrance skin dose (ESD) and effective dose (ED) to indicate deterministic and stochastic damage, respectively. The Biologic Effects of Ionizing Radiation (BEIR) VII, phase 2, report was used to estimate the expected increased risk of cancer in the study population. RESULTS: For diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, a mean ED of 10.4 and 34.0 mSv per procedure was calculated, respectively. The ESD values proved too low to cause deterministic harm. The estimated number of excess cases of malignancy projected from the total average radiation exposure was 890.6 per 100,000 exposed male children and 1,222.5 per 100,000 exposed females, an overall increase of approximately 1% to the lifetime attributable risk of cancer. CONCLUSION: Although both angiography and CT have revolutionized the practice of medicine and confer benefits to patients, it is important that we continue to investigate the possible adverse effects of these technologies. Protocols that minimize radiation dose without compromising a study should be implemented.


Asunto(s)
Angiografía Cerebral , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , Neurorradiografía , Dosis de Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/prevención & control , Traumatismos por Radiación/etiología , Traumatismos por Radiación/prevención & control , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Piel/efectos de la radiación
10.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 189(1): 7-11, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17579143

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: A data-mining program extracts computed radiography (CR) sensitivity-number (S-number) information from the PACS at our institution on a monthly basis as an ongoing quality assurance (QA) improvement project. These data are compared with the previous month's data and departmental S-number goals. The results are presented at monthly QA meetings. The S-number trends are then used by technologists to modify radiographic technique charts to reach the departmental S-number target range goals. CONCLUSION: This cyclic QA improvement process shows that mining PACS data can be useful in reducing patient radiation dose and interexamination dose variance.


Asunto(s)
Almacenamiento y Recuperación de la Información/métodos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud/métodos , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Sistemas de Información Radiológica , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Algoritmos , Sistemas de Administración de Bases de Datos , Sistemas en Línea , Vigilancia de la Población/métodos , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Washingtón
11.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 189(1): 219-25, 2007 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17579174

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to develop a better understanding of the complex interrelationship between image noise, reconstruction slice thickness, and patient radiation dose on a 64-MDCT scanner that uses automated tube current modulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed physics theory and performed phantom dose measurements on a 64-MDCT scanner while altering operator-selectable image noise and reconstruction slice thickness. RESULTS: Using phantom dose measurements to adjust theoretic predictions, we constructed both a spreadsheet and a graph that visually display the interrelationships between operator-selected image noise and reconstruction slice thickness and the resulting patient dose. CONCLUSION: This table and graph may help operators understand the trade-offs when prospectively trying to minimize dose and optimize image noise for selected reconstruction slice thicknesses on this type of 64-MDCT scanner.


Asunto(s)
Carga Corporal (Radioterapia) , Modelos Biológicos , Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica/métodos , Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador/métodos , Radiometría/métodos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Algoritmos , Simulación por Computador , Humanos , Dosis de Radiación , Efectividad Biológica Relativa , Estadística como Asunto , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/instrumentación
12.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 188(6 Suppl): S50-4, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19642250

RESUMEN

The educational objectives for this self-assessment module on safe MR practices are for the participant to exercise, self-assess, and improve his or her knowledge of hazards to patients, medical personnel, and others in the MR scanner environment, and to exercise, self-assess, and improve his or her knowledge of safe practices in the operation of MR scanners.


Asunto(s)
Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/efectos adversos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/normas , Contraindicaciones , Medios de Contraste/administración & dosificación , Medios de Contraste/efectos adversos , Femenino , Gadolinio/administración & dosificación , Gadolinio/efectos adversos , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Metales , Salud Laboral , Embarazo , Prótesis e Implantes
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...