One-year follow-up of the immunogenicity and safety of a primary series of the NVX-CoV2373 (TAK-019) vaccine in healthy Japanese adults: Final report of a phase I/II randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: In the interim report of this phase I/II randomized, placebo-controlled trial in Japanese adults, a two-dose primary series of NVX-CoV2373 (5 µg SARS-CoV-2 recombinant nanoparticle spike protein [rS]; 50 µg Matrix-M) administered 21 days apart induced robust anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses up to day 50 and had an acceptable safety profile. METHODS: Following the double-blind phase of this study (day 1-50), participants were informed about their assignment to NVX-CoV2373 or placebo, and their reconsent was required for continuation in the open-label phase (day 51-387). This final report evaluated immunogenicity on days 202 and 387, and safety findings from the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 131/150 participants in the NVX-CoV2373 arm and 4/50 in the placebo arm completed the study. The most common reason for discontinuation was because the participant requested a publicly available COVID-19 vaccine. At 6 months and 1 year after the second vaccine dose, both the geometric mean titres of anti-SARS-CoV-2 rS serum immunoglobulin G and serum neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain were numerically higher than before the second dose. There were no deaths, adverse events (AEs) leading to participant withdrawal, or AEs of special interest throughout the trial. During follow-up, 2.0 % (1/50) of participants in the placebo arm reported COVID-19 approximately 1 month after the second vaccine dose (serious AE requiring hospitalisation, already presented in the interim report) and 2.7 % (4/150) in the NVX-CoV2373 arm after approximately 10 months (mild [2/4] or moderate [2/4] in severity). DISCUSSION: A primary series of NVX-CoV2373 induced persistent immune responses up to 1 year after the second dose. The vaccine was well tolerated and had an acceptable safety profile. We believe our findings offer important insights for determining dosing intervals between primary and booster vaccinations.

Immunogenicity and safety of a second heterologous booster dose of NVX-CoV2373 (TAK-019) in healthy Japanese adults who had previously received a primary series of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: Interim analysis report of a phase 3 open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3, single-arm, open-label TAK-019-3001 study assessed two heterologous booster doses of NVX-CoV2373 administered 5 months apart in healthy Japanese adults who had completed a primary series of a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine 6-12 months previously. In the main part of this study, a first booster induced rapid and robust anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses, addressing waning immunity in participants. METHODS: This interim analysis evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of a second booster in the extension part of this study including comparisons with the first booster. Immunogenicity was assessed on extension day (ED) 1 (before vaccination) and ED15. Solicited and unsolicited adverse events occurring in the 7 and 28 days, respectively, after vaccination were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 150 participants who received a first NVX-CoV2373 booster, 129 were administered a second booster on ED1. Participant characteristics were consistent between the main and extension parts of the study. Titres of anti-SARS-CoV-2 rS serum immunoglobulin G and serum neutralizing antibodies against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain at ED15 were 4.0- and 3.0-fold higher, respectively, than those observed 5 months after the first booster on ED1, and 3.0- and 1.4-fold higher, respectively, than those observed 14 days after the first booster on day 15. The proportions of participants who experienced solicited local and systemic adverse events (AEs) in the 7 days after the second booster were 73.6 % and 51.2 %, respectively: most were of grade 2 severity or lower. Seven percent of participants experienced unsolicited AEs in the 28 days after the second booster: all were unrelated to the treatment. There were no deaths or AEs leading to study discontinuation. DISCUSSION: A second heterologous NVX-CoV2373 booster in healthy Japanese adults induced more robust anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses than the first booster. The second booster was well tolerated. No new safety concerns were identified.

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of icatibant treatment in Japanese pediatric patients with hereditary angioedema: A phase 3, open-label study.

We evaluated the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous weight-adjusted icatibant for the treatment of acute hereditary angioedema attacks in Japanese pediatric patients. Two patients (aged 10-13 and 6-9 years) received icatibant for a total of four attacks. Each attack was abdominal and/or cutaneous and was treated with a single icatibant injection. Mild or moderate injection-site reactions were the only adverse events reported. Time to onset of symptom relief was 0.9-1.0 h. Icatibant was rapidly absorbed, with a pharmacokinetic profile consistent with previous studies. Simulated exposure levels were consistent with non-Japanese pediatric patients. These results support the safety and efficacy of icatibant in Japanese pediatric patients.

Immunogenicity and safety of a single booster dose of NVX-CoV2373 (TAK-019) in healthy Japanese adults who had previously received a primary series of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine: Primary analysis report of a phase 3 open-label trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of NVX-CoV2373 in Japanese adults who had completed a primary series of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine 6-12 months previously. METHODS: This single-arm, open-label, phase 3 study, conducted at two Japanese centres, enrolled healthy adults ≥ 20 years old. Participants received a booster dose of NVX-CoV2373. The primary immunogenicity endpoint was non-inferiority (lower limit of the 95 % confidence interval [CI] ≥ 0.67) of the geometric mean titre (GMT) ratio of titres of serum neutralizing antibodies (nAbs) against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain 14 days after booster vaccination (day 15) in this study, compared with those 14 days after the second primary NVX-CoV2373 vaccination (day 36) in the TAK-019-1501 study (NCT04712110). Primary safety endpoints included local and systemic solicited adverse events (AEs) up to day 7 and unsolicited AEs up to day 28. RESULTS: Between 15 April 2022 and 10 May 2022, 155 participants were screened and 150, stratified by age (20-64 years old [n = 135] or ≥ 65 years old [n = 15]), received an NVX-CoV2373 booster dose. The GMT ratio between titres of serum nAbs against the SARS-CoV-2 ancestral strain on day 15 in this study and those on day 36 in the TAK-019-1501 study was 1.18 (95 % CI, 0.95-1.47), meeting the non-inferiority criterion. Following vaccination, the proportion of participants who reported local and systemic solicited AEs up to day 7 was 74.0 % and 48.0 %, respectively. The most common local and systemic solicited AEs were tenderness (102 participants [68.0 %]) and malaise (39 participants [26.0 %]), respectively. Seven participants (4.7 %) reported unsolicited AEs between vaccination and day 28; all were severity grade ≤ 2. DISCUSSION: A single heterologous NVX-CoV2373 booster induced rapid and robust anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses, addressing waning immunity in healthy Japanese adults, and had an acceptable safety profile. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT05299359.

Safety and Effectiveness of Vedolizumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis: An Interim Analysis of a Japanese Post-Marketing Surveillance Study.

INTRODUCTION: This ongoing post-marketing surveillance monitors the long-term safety and effectiveness of vedolizumab in routine clinical practice in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) in Japan. This interim analysis assessed induction-phase data, covering the initial three doses of vedolizumab. METHODS: Patients were enrolled via a web-based electronic data capture system from approximately 250 institutions. Incidence of adverse events and treatment responses were assessed by the physicians after the patient had received three doses of vedolizumab or when the drug was discontinued, whichever occurred first. Therapeutic response was defined as any treatment response, including remission or improvement of complete or partial Mayo score, and was assessed in the total and stratified patient populations according to prior tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) inhibitor treatments and/or baseline partial Mayo score. RESULTS: The total incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 4.10% (11/268). Common ADRs were dizziness, nausea, and arthralgia, each reported in 0.75% of patients (2/268). Serious ADRs were herpes zoster oticus and UC, each reported in 0.37% of patients (1/268). Therapeutic response was reported in 84.5% (218/258) of all patients, 85.8% (127/148) of TNFα inhibitor-naïve patients, and 82.7% (91/110) of TNFα inhibitor-experienced patients. Among patients with partial Mayo score of ≥ 4 at baseline, partial Mayo score remission in patients without or with prior TNFα inhibitor treatment was 62.5% (60/96) and 45.6% (36/79), respectively. CONCLUSION: The results confirm a safety and effectiveness profile of vedolizumab consistent with that observed in previous trials. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-194603, NCT03824561.

Safety and immunogenicity of NVX-CoV2373 (TAK-019) vaccine in healthy Japanese adults: Interim report of a phase I/II randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of NVX-CoV2373, a recombinant SARS-CoV-2 nanoparticle vaccine, in healthy Japanese participants. METHODS: This phase 1/2, randomized, observer-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Japan (two sites), enrolled healthy Japanese adults aged ≥ 20 years with no history/risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and no prior exposure to other approved/investigational SARS-CoV-2 vaccines or treatments. Participants were stratified by age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years) and randomized to receive two doses of either NVX-CoV2373 (5 µg SARS-CoV-2 rS; 50 µg Matrix-M1) or placebo, 21 days apart. Primary outcomes were safety and immunogenicity assessed by serum IgG antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 rS protein on day 36. Herein, we report the primary data analysis at 4 weeks after the second dose, ahead of 12-month follow-up completion (data cut-off: 8 May 2021). RESULTS: Between 12 February 2021 and 17 March 2021, 326 subjects were screened, and 200 participants enrolled and randomized: NVX-CoV2373, n = 150; placebo, n = 50. Solicited adverse events (AEs) through 7 days after each injection occurred in 121/150 (80.7%) and 11/50 (22.0%) participants in the NVX-CoV2373 and placebo arms, respectively. In the NVX-CoV2373 arm, tenderness and injection site pain were the most frequently reported solicited AEs after each vaccination, irrespective of age. Robust immune responses occurred with NVX-CoV2373 (n = 150) by day 36: IgG geometric mean fold rise (95% confidence interval) 259 (219, 306); seroconversion rate 100% (97.6, 100). No such response occurred with placebo (n = 49). CONCLUSION: Two doses of NVX-CoV2373 given with a 21-day interval demonstrated acceptable safety and induced robust anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in healthy Japanese adults. FUNDING: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT04712110.

A phase 1/2 randomised placebo-controlled study of the COVID-19 vaccine mRNA-1273 in healthy Japanese adults: An interim report.

INTRODUCTION: The mRNA vaccine, mRNA-1273/TAK-919, encodes the prefusion-stabilised spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). We report interim results of the first study evaluating safety and immunogenicity of mRNA-1273 in healthy Japanese participants. METHODS: This phase 1/2, randomised, observer-blind, placebo-controlled trial, conducted in Japan (two sites), enrolled healthy adults aged ≥ 20 years with no prior exposure to investigational coronavirus vaccines/treatments, and no known history/risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Participants were stratified by age (< 65/≥ 65 years) and randomised to receive two doses of 100 µg mRNA-1273 or placebo administered as intramuscular injections 28 days apart. Primary outcomes were safety and immunogenicity assessed by anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike protein-binding antibody level (bAb). A secondary outcome was SARS-CoV-2 neutralising antibody (nAb) response. RESULTS: Participants were enrolled between 21 January and 3 February 2021, and 200 were randomised: mRNA-1273, n = 150 (< 65 years, n = 100; ≥ 65 years, n = 50); placebo, n = 50 (< 65 years, n = 40; ≥ 65 years, n = 10). Solicited adverse events (AEs) through 7 days after each vaccination occurred in 144/150 (96%) and 19/50 (38%) participants in the mRNA-1273 and placebo arms, respectively. In the mRNA-1273 arm, injection-site pain, myalgia and fatigue were the most frequently reported solicited AEs after each vaccination, irrespective of age. Robust immune responses occurred with mRNA-1273 (n = 147) with a bAb geometric mean fold rise (95% confidence interval [CI]) from baseline of 1009 (865, 1177) and a nAb of 21.7 (19.8, 23.8) at day 57. Seroconversion rates (95% CI) for bAb and nAb were both 100% (97.5, 100) at day 57. No such response occurred with placebo (n = 49). CONCLUSION: Two doses of 100 µg mRNA-1273 given 28 days apart demonstrated an acceptable safety profile and induced significant anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in a Japanese population aged ≥ 20 years. FUNDING: Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED). CLINICALTRIALS: gov: NCT04677660.

Safety and efficacy of azilsartan in paediatric patients with hypertension: a phase 3, single-arm, open-label, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Azilsartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker indicated for the treatment of adult hypertension. A previous single-dose study suggested that azilsartan may also be a promising agent for paediatric hypertension. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of azilsartan in children have not been established. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, single-arm, open-label, prospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of azilsartan in pediatric patients with hypertension. Twenty-seven patients aged 6-15 years were treated with once-daily azilsartan for 52 weeks. The starting dose was 2.5 mg for patients weighing < 50 kg (N = 22) and 5 mg for patients weighing ≥ 50 kg (N = 5), with doses titrated up to a maximum of 20 and 40 mg, respectively. RESULTS: Azilsartan showed acceptable tolerability at doses up to 20 mg in patients weighing < 50 kg and 40 mg in those weighing ≥ 50 kg. Most drug-related adverse events (AEs) were mild, with one patient (3.7%) experiencing a severe and serious drug-related AE (acute kidney injury). One patient (3.7%) had a mild increase in serum creatinine level, which resolved after treatment discontinuation. The blood pressure-lowering effect of azilsartan was observed as early as Week 2. Overall, approximately half of the patients achieved their target blood pressure at the end of azilsartan treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that azilsartan has an acceptable safety profile in hypertensive patients aged 6-15 years. Azilsartan may be a promising agent for treating paediatric hypertension.

A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adult Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: TOURMALINE-MM1 was a global study that demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival with ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared with placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. The current study was conducted to evaluate further the efficacy and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Japanese patients. METHODS: This phase 2, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study enrolled patients aged ≥ 20 years with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma at 16 sites in Japan. Patients refractory to lenalidomide or proteasome inhibitor-based therapy at any line were excluded. The primary endpoint was the rate of very good partial response or better in the response-evaluable analysis set. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, overall response rate, duration of response, time to progression, overall survival and safety. RESULTS: In total, 34 patients were enrolled. The rate of very good partial response or better was 50.0% (95% confidence interval 31.9-68.1) and the overall response rate was 84.4% (95% confidence interval 67.2-94.7). Median progression-free survival was 22.0 months (95% confidence interval 17.3-not evaluable) and median overall survival was not estimable. The safety profile of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in this study was similar to that in the TOURMALINE-MM1 study. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma are comparable with reported TOURMALINE-MM1 study results. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT02917941; date of registration September 28, 2016.

Effects of vedolizumab in Japanese patients with Crohn's disease: a prospective, multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 3 trial with exploratory analyses.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective humanized antibody that binds the α4ß7 integrin. We evaluated efficacy and safety of vedolizumab in Japanese patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: In this Phase 3, double-blind study (NCT02038920), 157 patients were randomized to receive intravenous vedolizumab 300 mg (n = 79) or placebo (n = 78) at Weeks 0, 2, and 6 (induction phase). Patients with CD activity index (CDAI)-70 response at Week 10 were randomized to receive vedolizumab 300 mg (n = 12) or placebo (n = 12) at Week 14, then every 8 weeks until Week 54 (maintenance phase). Primary endpoints were ≥ 100-point reduction in CDAI (CDAI-100 response) at Week 10 for induction, and clinical remission (CR: CDAI ≤ 150) at Week 60 for maintenance. RESULTS: At Week 10, 26.6% of patients who received vedolizumab and 16.7% who received placebo achieved CDAI-100 response (odds ratio [OR] [95% confidence interval (CI)] 1.80 [0.82-3.96]; p = 0.145). At Week 60, 41.7% of vedolizumab-treated patients and 16.7% of placebo-treated patients achieved CR (OR [95% CI] 3.57 [0.53-23.95]; p = 0.178). The incidence of adverse events was similar in both treatment groups in both induction and maintenance phases. In patients without prior anti-TNFα exposure or with inadequate response to anti-TNFα, vedolizumab showed improved outcomes over placebo in the induction phase. Age might be a possible predictive factor of CR for future research. CONCLUSION: Vedolizumab showed a numerically greater efficacy versus placebo as induction therapy, but the difference was not statistically significant. Vedolizumab also showed a numerically greater efficacy in maintenance therapy, and was well tolerated.

Correction: Vedolizumab in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis: A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212989.].

Vedolizumab in Japanese patients with ulcerative colitis: A Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

BACKGROUND: Vedolizumab safety and efficacy have been established in many populations all over the world, but have never been studied in Japan. We report results from a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of vedolizumab in Japanese patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe UC were enrolled into Cohort 1 (double-blinded) or Cohort 2 (open-label) in the induction phase. Cohort 1 was randomized 2:1 to receive 300 mg vedolizumab or placebo, while Cohort 2 received vedolizumab 300 mg only, at Weeks 0, 2, and 6. Patients from Cohorts 1 and 2 showing a clinical response to vedolizumab at Week 10 were randomized 1:1 to receive vedolizumab or placebo (double-blinded) at Week 14 and then every 8 weeks up to Week 54 as the maintenance phase. The primary endpoint was clinical response at Week 10, for the induction phase, and clinical remission at Week 60, for the maintenance phase. RESULTS: A total of 292 patients were enrolled into the induction phase (246 in Cohort 1, 46 in Cohort 2); 83 patients achieved response to vedolizumab and were subsequently enrolled into the maintenance phase. Clinical response rates at Week 10 were 39.6% (65/164) and 32.9% (27/82) in the vedolizumab and placebo groups in Cohort 1, respectively (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.37, 95% CI 0.779-2.399; p = 0.2722). In the maintenance phase, clinical remission rate at Week 60 was significantly higher in the vedolizumab group, at 56.1% (23/41), versus 31.0% (13/42) for placebo (AOR = 2.88, 95% CI 1.168-7.108; p = 0.0210). Most adverse events were mild to moderate in intensity, and no deaths occurred during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Vedolizumab showed numerically greater efficacy compared with placebo as induction therapy, but the difference was not statistically significant. Vedolizumab was significantly superior to placebo as maintenance therapy in Japanese patients with UC. Vedolizumab has favourable safety and tolerability in these patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02039505.

Japan PGx Data Science Consortium Database: SNPs and HLA genotype data from 2994 Japanese healthy individuals for pharmacogenomics studies.

Japan Pharmacogenomics Data Science Consortium (JPDSC) has assembled a database for conducting pharmacogenomics (PGx) studies in Japanese subjects. The database contains the genotypes of 2.5 million single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 5 human leukocyte antigen loci from 2994 Japanese healthy volunteers, as well as 121 kinds of clinical information, including self-reports, physiological data, hematological data and biochemical data. In this article, the reliability of our data was evaluated by principal component analysis (PCA) and association analysis for hematological and biochemical traits by using genome-wide SNP data. PCA of the SNPs showed that all the samples were collected from the Japanese population and that the samples were separated into two major clusters by birthplace, Okinawa and other than Okinawa, as had been previously reported. Among 87 SNPs that have been reported to be associated with 18 hematological and biochemical traits in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the associations of 56 SNPs were replicated using our data base. Statistical power simulations showed that the sample size of the JPDSC control database is large enough to detect genetic markers having a relatively strong association even when the case sample size is small. The JPDSC database will be useful as control data for conducting PGx studies to explore genetic markers to improve the safety and efficacy of drugs either during clinical development or in post-marketing.

Effect of azilsartan versus candesartan on morning blood pressure surges in Japanese patients with essential hypertension.

Morning blood pressure (BP) surge is reported as a risk factor for cardiovascular events and end-organ damage independent of the 24-h BP level. Controlling morning BP surge is therefore important to help prevent onset of cardiovascular disease. We compared the efficacy of azilsartan and candesartan in controlling morning systolic BP (SBP) surges by analyzing relevant ambulatory BP monitoring data in patients with/without baseline BP surges. As part of a 16-week randomized, double-blind study of azilsartan (20-40 mg once daily) and candesartan (8-12 mg once daily) in Japanese patients with essential hypertension, an exploratory analysis was carried out using ambulatory BP monitoring at baseline and week 14. The effects of study drugs on morning BP surges, including sleep trough surge (early morning SBP minus the lowest night-time SBP) and prewaking surge (early morning SBP minus SBP before awakening), were evaluated. Patients with sleep trough surge of at least 35 mmHg were defined by the presence of a morning BP surge (the 'surge group'). Sleep trough surge and prewaking surge data were available at both baseline and week 14 in 548 patients, 147 of whom (azilsartan 76; candesartan 71) had a baseline morning BP surge. In surge group patients, azilsartan significantly reduced both the sleep trough surge and the prewaking surge at week 14 compared with candesartan (least squares means of the between-group differences -5.8 mmHg, P=0.0395; and -5.7 mmHg, P=0.0228, respectively). Once-daily azilsartan improved sleep trough surge and prewaking surge to a greater extent than candesartan in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension.

Efficacy and safety of a 60-week treatment with candesartan in Japanese patients with mild to moderate chronic heart failure.

BACKGROUND: Chronic heart failure (CHF) is an increasingly common cardiovascular disease despite recent advances in its diagnosis and management. METHODS AND RESULTS: A multicenter, open-label study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of 60-week treatment with candesartan in Japanese patients with mild to moderate CHF. Primary efficacy endpoints were changes from baseline in plasma brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-diastolic dimension, and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class. Two hundred and eighty-nine eligible patients were divided into 2 groups based on the daily dose at the end of treatment: high-dose (HD, 8mg, N=170) and low-dose (LD, 2 or 4mg, N=119). Neither plasma BNP levels nor LVEF changed from the baseline to the end of treatment in the LD group, whereas BNP significantly improved from 61.6 to 50.1pg/mL (p=0.0005) and LVEF from 57.2 to 60.1% (p=0.0005) in the HD group. The changes in NYHA functional class were comparable between groups: 21.2% improved and 76.3% unchanged in the LD group and 20.6% improved and 79.4% unchanged in the HD group. No safety concerns were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: HD candesartan was more effective in improving plasma BNP levels and cardiac function than LD in Japanese CHF patients. Both LD and HD candesartan were well tolerated in CHF patients.

A multicenter, phase III evaluation of the efficacy and safety of a new fixed-dose pioglitazone/glimepiride combination tablet in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of pioglitazone/glimepiride as a fixed-dose combination (FDC) in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this multicenter, phase III, open-label evaluation, eligible patients had to have a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA(1c)) level of ≥7.4% and <10.4% halfway through a 4-week run-in period while being treated with glimepiride 1 or 3 mg once daily plus diet and exercise. At baseline, patients were assigned to 8 weeks of treatment with pioglitazone/glimepiride (15 mg/1 mg) FDC once daily (group A; n=31) or pioglitazone/glimepiride (30 mg/3 mg) FDC once daily (group B; n=31) according to their glimepiride dose during run-in. RESULTS: Pioglitazone/glimepiride significantly reduced the mean HbA(1c) level from baseline (primary end point) by 0.59±0.556% in group A (P<0.0001) and by 0.55±0.637% in group B (P<0.0001). Corresponding reductions in the mean fasting blood glucose level were 12.5±21.67 mg/dL (P=0.0032) and 29.1±35.38 mg/dL (P<0.0001). Significant alterations from baseline to week 8 in either one or both treatment groups were also noted for the following parameters: 1,5-anhydroglucitol, glycoalbumin, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and free fatty acid levels. Five patients in group A (16.1%) had five treatment-related adverse events, and 10 patients in group B (32.3%) had 13 such events; all events were mild. CONCLUSIONS: Pioglitazone/glimepiride as a FDC (30 mg/3 mg and 15 mg/1 mg once daily) significantly improved glycemic control and lipid profiles and was well tolerated in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of azilsartan with that of candesartan cilexetil in Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension: a randomized, double-blind clinical study.

Azilsartan is a novel angiotensin receptor blocker being developed for hypertension treatment. This 16-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study compared the efficacy and safety of azilsartan (20-40 mg once daily by forced titration) and its ability to provide 24-h blood pressure (BP) control, with that of candesartan cilexetil (candesartan; 8-12 mg once daily by forced titration) in 622 Japanese patients with grade I-II essential hypertension. Efficacy was evaluated by clinic-measured sitting BP, and by ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) at week 14. Participants (mean age: 57 years, 61% males) had a mean baseline sitting BP of 159.8/100.4 mm Hg. The mean change from baseline in sitting diastolic BP at week 16 (primary endpoint) was -12.4 mm Hg in the azilsartan group and -9.8 mm Hg in the candesartan group, demonstrating a statistically significant greater reduction with azilsartan vs. candesartan (difference: -2.6 mm Hg, 95% confidence interval (CI): -4.08 to -1.22 mm Hg, P=0.0003). The week 16 (secondary endpoint) mean change from baseline in sitting systolic BP was -21.8 mm Hg and -17.5 mm Hg, respectively, a significant decrease with azilsartan vs. candesartan (difference: -4.4 mm Hg, 95% CI: -6.53 to -2.20 mm Hg, P<0.0001). On ABPM, the week 14 mean changes from baseline in diastolic and systolic BP were also significantly greater with azilsartan over a 24-h period, and during the daytime, night-time and early morning. Safety and tolerability were similar among the two groups. These data demonstrate that once-daily azilsartan provides a more potent 24-h sustained antihypertensive effect than that of candesartan but with equivalent safety.

Efficacy and safety of combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil and pioglitazone hydrochloride in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with candesartan cilexetil (CC) and pioglitazone hydrochloride (PIO) in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: A 12-week, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus was followed by a 40-week, single-blind study. Patients (N = 377) were randomized to treatment with CC 8 mg/PIO 30 mg (n = 62), CC 8 mg/PIO 15 mg (n = 63), CC 4 mg/PIO 30 mg (n = 63), CC 4 mg/PIO 15 mg (n = 63), CC 8 mg/PIO 0 mg (n = 63), or CC 0 mg/PIO 30 mg (n = 63). Primary efficacy measures were changes in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and HbA(1C) at Week 12. RESULTS: CC/PIO combination therapy improved blood pressure (BP)/glycemic control for 52 weeks. At the end of 12-week treatment period, DBP decreased to a significantly greater extent in the 8/30 + 8/15 + 8/0 (combined CC 8 mg) group (-10.5 mmHg, p < 0.0001) and the 4/30 + 4/15 (combined CC 4 mg) group (-9.1 mmHg, p = 0.0022) than in the 0/30 (CC 0 mg) group (-5.3 mmHg). HbA(1C) significantly decreased in the 8/30 + 4/30 + 0/30 (combined PIO 30 mg) group (-0.35%, p < 0.0001) and the 8/15 + 4/15 (combined PIO 15 mg) group (-0.15%, p < 0.0001) compared with the 8/0 (PIO 0 mg) group (0.35%). Urinary albumin excretion reduction seen with the 0/30 and the 8/0 groups was significantly enhanced by CC/PIO combination. Clinical significance of this renoprotective effect of CC/PIO combination therapy needs to be studied further. Prolonged combined use of CC/PIO did not increase adverse events. Drug-related adverse events were similar to those during clinical use of CC and PIO. CONCLUSION: CC/PIO combination therapy improved BP/glycemic control and was well tolerated for 52 weeks. Thus, CC/PIO combination therapy is useful in patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes mellitus.