What is (Un)Flavored? A Scoping Review of the Conceptualization of Flavored Cigarillos.

PURPOSE: To identify how flavor is conceptualized with respect to cigarillos to illuminate areas of concordance and discordance and provide a pathway for the harmonization of tobacco flavor measurement. METHODS: Three methods were used to identify research measuring flavors respective to cigarillo products including: 1) querying research databases using key words 'cigarillo,' 'tobacco' and 'flavor'/'flavour,' 2) sub-sampling of the eligible literature with backwards and forwards reference searching, and 3) a bibliographic search of key experts. Two reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full texts. Inclusion criteria required manuscripts to be available in English, published prior to 3/1/2022, be original and peer-reviewed, and include a measure of flavor pertaining to cigarillo products. A total of 163 manuscripts met these criteria and were subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: Cigarillo flavor determinations were made based on the presence of flavoring agents, sensory characteristics, marketing or package characteristics, pre-defined lists, the absence of any of these, and/or were undefined. Individual flavors and their related classifications were not altogether mutually exclusive due to differences in conceptualization which has evolved over time. CONCLUSION: Flavor measures continue to evolve, likely in response to both tobacco control policies and industry shifts. There is a lack of standardization in flavor conceptualization that can be ameliorated through intentional integration of multiple forms of research such as identifying patterns of flavoring agents and/or marketing strategies that elicit a specific flavor profile. By doing this, we may more comprehensively evaluate the impact of flavors, their constituents, and related marketing strategies on broader population health. IMPLICATIONS: There are discrepancies in the conceptualization of flavor in tobacco and nicotine products. The lack of standardized, definitive language limits our ability to comprehensively evaluate the population-level health impact of flavors in addition to our ability to effectively inform, implement and enforce policies restricting flavors in tobacco and nicotine products.

Flavour loyalty may predict cessation or substitution following a cigarillo flavour ban among young adults in the USA.

SIGNIFICANCE: The purpose of this research was to measure flavour loyalty and identify how current cigarillo users may respond to a hypothetical flavour ban in the USA. METHODS: Cigarillo users aged 21-28 (n=531) were recruited between October 2020 and April 2021 to participate in an online survey. Respondents categorised their preferred, usual and current cigarillo flavours. Individuals who preferred tobacco flavours were compared with individuals who preferred any other flavours. Strength of preferences, or flavour loyalty, was defined when an individual's preferred flavour matched what they use both usually and currently creating a spectrum of individuals with a strong tobacco preference (n=34), weak tobacco preference (n=20), weak flavour preference (n=162) and strong flavour preference (n=315). Those preferring tobacco were aggregated into any tobacco preference (n=54). RESULTS: Individuals who preferred any flavour scored higher on a scale of nicotine dependence. There was a dose-response relationship in those who said they would discontinue cigarillos if flavoured options were not available: 11.4% of individuals with any tobacco flavour preference, 27.8% of those with a weak flavour preference and 38.1% of those with a strong flavour preference. A similar trend was noted among those who would switch to another product: 19.2% of those with tobacco flavour preference, 34.3% of those with a weak flavour preference and 43.2% of those with a strong flavour preference. CONCLUSION: Individuals who display strong flavour preferences were more likely to say they would discontinue use or seek out alternative flavoured products following a ban on flavoured cigarillos.

Substitution of flavored cigarillos with menthol cigarettes among young adults in the U.S.

BACKGROUND: Young adult cigarillo users often cite flavor as a primary reason for initiating and sustaining product use and are more likely to concurrently use other tobacco products such as menthol cigarettes. This study examines substitution with menthol cigarettes among cigarillo users facing a hypothetical ban on flavored cigarillos. METHODS: Current young adult (21-28 years) cigarillo users were recruited from October 2020 to April 2021 for an online survey about cigarillo and other tobacco use behaviors. Participants (n = 500) self-reported past or current menthol cigarette experience, and if they would switch to menthol cigarettes if they could not get flavored cigarillos. Logistic regression was used to test differences in switching behaviors by level of experience with menthol cigarettes. RESULTS: Most young adult cigarillo users (76.8 %) had ever used a menthol cigarette and 46.6 % reported current use of menthol cigarettes. No participant who had never used menthol cigarettes reported they would switch to menthol cigarettes. Current users were 4.2 times as likely to say they would switch after controlling for demographic characteristics and nicotine dependence. CONCLUSION: Most young adult cigarillo users reported they would not switch to menthol cigarettes if flavored cigarillos became unavailable. However, participants who currently use or have used menthol cigarettes were more likely to report their intention to switch products than those who had never used menthol cigarettes. There may be a subsequent increase in menthol cigarette use among past menthol cigarette users if policies restricting flavored tobacco products exclude menthol cigarettes, diluting these policies' intended population health impact.

Dissonance in Young Adult Cigarillo Users' Categorization of Concept Flavored and Unflavored Products.

This study asks young adult cigarillo users to categorize their preferred flavor in order to examine user consensus and potential methodological and regulatory implications of flavor name-based categorization systems. Young adult (21-28 years) cigarillo users (n = 426) named and categorized their favorite cigarillo flavor into one of seven categories: Fruit, Sweet and Candy, Mint, Alcohol, Menthol, Tobacco, and Other. Flavor responses were coded as characterizing (ex: Grape, Wine) or concept (ex: Jazz, Diamond) flavors. Variation within and between categories was assessed, including the presence of concept flavors and the placement of flavors in multiple categories. Of the 66 unique flavor names provided, participants placed 20 (30.1%) in more than one flavor category. Most of the Tobacco (76.9%) and Other (69.2%) flavor names appeared in multiple categories. The majority of flavor names in the Tobacco (69.2%) and Other (61.5%) categories were concept flavors. Concept flavors were placed in multiple categories (45.0%) twice as often as characterizing flavors (23.9%). This study has identified dissonance among cigarillo users' flavor categorizations, particularly for concept flavored and unflavored products. Flavor names may obscure how and whether a product is flavored. Research on and regulation of flavored tobacco products should classify products by flavor additives rather than by name alone.