Apparent motion of monocular stimuli in different depth planes with lateral head movements.

A stationary monocular stimulus appears to move concomitantly with lateral head movements when it is embedded in a stereogram representing two front-facing rectangular areas, one above the other at two different distances. In Experiment 1, we found that the extent of perceived motion of the monocular stimulus covaried with the amplitude of head movement and the disparity between the two rectangular areas (composed of random dots). In Experiment 2, we found that the extent of perceived motion of the monocular stimulus was reduced compared to that in Experiment 1 when the rectangular areas were defined only by an outline rather than by random dots. These results are discussed using the hypothesis that a monocular stimulus takes on features of the binocular surface area in which it is embedded and is perceived as though it were treated as a binocular stimulus with regards to its visual direction and visual depth.

Unequal weighting of monocular inputs in binocular combination: implications for the compression of stereoscopic imagery.

For efficient storage and transmission of stereoscopic images over bandwidth-limited channels, compression can be achieved by degrading 1 monocular input of a stereo pair and maintaining the other at the desired quality. The desired quality of the fused stereoscopic image can be achieved, provided that binocular vision assigns greater weight to the nondegraded input. A psychophysical matching procedure was used to determine if such over-weighting occurred when the monocular degradation included blur or blocking artifacts. Over-weighting of the nondegraded input occurred for blur, but under-weighting of the nondegraded input occurred for blockiness. Some participants exhibited ocular dominance, but this did not affect the blur results. The authors conclude that blur, but not blockiness, is an acceptable form of monocular degradation.

Location of the egocenter in kinesthetic space.

The location of the egocenter in kinesthetic space was investigated in 4 experiments. Participants, with their eyes closed, adjusted a comparison stimulus after or while touching a standard in a transverse plane at the belly or shoulder level so that they perceived the line joining the comparison and the fixed standard as pointing directly at themselves. The mean location of the intersections of the obtained lines was taken as the location of the egocenter. The main results showed that the location of the kinesthetic egocenter depended on the hand or hands used for touching, the timing of touching, and the distance of the standard from the participant. Implications of these results were discussed in relation to models of the kinesthetic egocenter.

Control' of reflexive and voluntary saccades in the gap effect.

In two experiments, we examined whether voluntary and reflexive saccades shared a common fixation disengagement mechanism. Participants were required to perform a variety of tasks, each requiring a different level of information processing of the display prior to execution of the saccade. In Experiment 1, participants executed either a prosaccade or an antisaccade upon detecting a stimulus array. In Experiment 2, participants executed a prosaccade to a stimulus array only if the array contained a target item. The target could be a line (easy search) or a digit (difficult search). The critical manipulation in both experiments was the relative timing between the removal of the fixation stimulus and the onset of the stimulus array. In both experiments, it was found that saccadic latencies were shortest when the fixation stimulus was removed before the onset of the stimulus array--a gap effect. It was concluded that reflexive and voluntary saccades share a common fixation disengagement mechanism that is largely independent of higher level cognitive processes.

Wheatstone-Panum limiting case: occlusion, camouflage, and vergence-induced disparity cues.

We examined effects of binocular occlusion, binocular camouflage, and vergence-induced disparity cues on the perceived depth between two objects when two stimuli are presented to one eye and a single stimulus to the other (Wheatstone-Panum limiting case). The perceived order and magnitude of the depth were examined in two experimental conditions: (1) The stimulus was presented on the temporal side (occlusion condition) and (2) the nasal side (camouflage condition) of the stimulus pair on one retina so as to fuse with the single stimulus on the other retina. In both conditions, the separation between the stimulus pair presented to one eye was systematically varied. Experiment 1, with 16 observers, showed that the fused object was seen in front of the nonfused object in the occlusion condition and was seen at the same distance as the nonfused object in the camouflage condition. The perceived depth between the two objects was constant and did not depend on the separation of the stimulus pair presented to one eye. Experiment 2, with 45 observers, showed that the disparity induced by vergence mainly determined the perceived depth, and the depth magnitude increased as the separation of the stimulus pair was made wider. The results suggest that (1) occlusion provides depth-order information but not depth-magnitude information, (2) camouflage provides neither depth-order nor depth-magnitude information, and (3) vergence-induced disparity provides both order and magnitude information.

Display duration and stereoscopic depth discrimination.

We investigated the role of display duration in stereoscopic depth perception. The display consisted of a dynamic random-dot stereogram, with two disparity-defined squares (1.9 degrees x 1.9 degrees), one on the left and one on the right of a central (Nonius) fixation stimulus. The sign of the disparity (crossed or uncrossed) was always the same for both squares, and the magnitude of disparity was 0.25 degree for one square and either 0.125 degree or 0.375 degree for the other square. Participants indicated which square appeared closer. The display duration was varied adaptively between 20 and 1000 ms until participants performed at 75% accuracy. Results confirmed large individual differences in the display duration required for stereoscopic depth perception. Approximately half of the 100 naive participants were able to perform the task at 20 ms, while the remaining participants required up to 1000 ms to perform at criterion. The present study shows that display duration is a critical variable in explaining wide differences in reported abilities of individuals to process stereoscopic depth information.

Fixation disengagement and eye-movement latency.

We examined eye-movement latencies to a target that appeared during visual fixation of stationary stimulus, a moving stimulus, or an extrafoveal stimulus. The stimulus at fixation was turned off either before target onset (gap condition) or after target onset (overlap condition). Consistent with previous research, saccadic latencies were shorter in gap conditions than they were in overlap conditions (the gap effect). In Experiment 1, a gap effect was observed for vergence eye movements. In Experiment 2, a gap effect was observed for saccades directed at a target that appeared during visual pursuit of a moving stimulus. In Experiment 3, a gap effect was observed for saccades directed at a target that appeared during extrafoveal fixation. The present results extend reports of the gap effect for saccadic shifts during visual fixation to (a) vergence shifts during visual fixation, (b) saccadic shifts during smooth visual pursuit, and (c) saccadic shifts during extrafoveal fixation. The present findings are discussed with respect to the incompatible goals of fixation-locking and fixation-shifting oculomotor responses.

Viewing behavior: ocular and attentional disengagement.

In five experiments, we examined the role of the ocular and attentional systems in determining saccadic latencies. Prior to making a saccade to a target stimulus, subjects were required to direct their attention to a foveal stimulus or to an eccentric stimulus. Either stimulus could be extinguished before the onset of the target. Saccadic latencies were shortest when the foveal stimulus was extinguished, regardless of whether it was attended or not. Control experiments showed that subjects were able to attend properly and that warning, arising from turning off a stimulus before target onset, could not completely account for the results. The results were discussed in terms of ocular disengagement, attentional disengagement, and joint ocular-attentional disengagement. It was concluded that an explanation emphasizing ocular disengagement provided the best account of the data.

Two factors affecting saccadic amplitude during vergence: the location of the cyclopean eye and a left-right bias.

Saccades occurring during vergence have been reported to differ in amplitude depending on whether the saccade drives the eyes leftward or rightward. Furthermore, this difference varies in degree and direction among individuals. We examined two explanations of the variation--that it is the result of the cyclopean eye being nearer to one eye, and that it is the result of a pervasive bias, within an individual, to make larger saccades either leftward or rightward. Examination of the saccades of 14 subjects, recorded during both divergent and convergent movements that required leftward or rightward saccades, shows that neither explanation alone provides an adequate account of the differences observed. However, statistical analysis (ANOVA) indicates that almost 60% of the total variation in the observed saccadic amplitudes is related to the two explanations taken together. We speculate that both influences act on the saccade in a given individual, and that the amplitude manifested depends on the relative magnitudes of the two influences within that individual.

Apparent displacement with a monocular prism differs from optical displacement.

This experiment showed that phoria-induced displacement adds to or subtracts from prism-induced displacement. A near stimulus (25 cm) was apparently displaced more than the optical displacement when the base of a prism was out and less when the base was in. In contrast, a far stimulus (200 cm) was displaced less when the base was out and more when the base was in. Moreover, the between-subjects variability of the apparent displacement was greater with monocular than with binocular viewing. Some implications for studies on monocular prism adaptation are discussed.