Assay Interference Causing Persistently Elevated Vancomycin Levels Leading to Treatment Failure and Fatal Outcome.

In patients receiving vancomycin therapy, serum drug levels are routinely monitored to ensure therapeutic dosing and minimize toxicity. In rare cases, vancomycin levels may be falsely or persistently elevated without any apparent cause. In this case report, we explore a rare case of persistently elevated vancomycin levels despite discontinuation of the drug for days.  This is a case of a 69-year-old female admitted for altered mental status secondary to sepsis from leg cellulitis. Antibiotic therapy included vancomycin. To ensure proper dosing, vancomycin trough levels were collected before the fourth dose, and the result showed a high value of 39 ug/ml. Vancomycin doses were adjusted as per the Bayesian dosing software, and the same remained to be in supratherapeutic levels. The patient eventually deteriorated, and due to persistently high vancomycin levels, the antibiotic regimen was switched to a different antibiotic. Despite normal renal functions, the vancomycin levels remained high, between 27 ug/ml and 32 ug/ml, even in the absence of any further doses. Subsequently, vancomycin serum concentration was determined by another method using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Blood cultures grew both coagulase-negative Staphylococcus aureus and Achromobacter xylosoxidans. Vancomycin levels remained high a week after discontinuation of the drug. Vancomycin by HPLC assay eventually showed that vancomycin was undetectable in the blood, but, unfortunately, the results came at a time when the patient had already expired. In conclusion, clinicians should maintain a high level of suspicion if persistently higher vancomycin levels cannot be accounted for by renal function or other causes. In patients with persistently high vancomycin levels who continue to clinically deteriorate, it is crucial to consider that assay interference can result in inaccurately elevated vancomycin levels.

A Rare Case of Pseudomonas luteola Bacteremia Complicated by Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis.

Pseudomonas luteola (P. luteola), or Chryseomonas luteola, is an organism rarely reported as a human pathogen of concern. Commonly missed due to its rarity, emerging literature has shown its potential for pathogenicity; therefore, increased vigilance must always be observed in dealing with these bacteria, especially in immunocompromised patients and those with indwelling catheters, foreign bodies, and prosthetic implants. We present a case of a patient who came in for a persistent headache, found to have meningitis, and ended up with cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CSVT) on further investigation. Interestingly, the patient did not have any other medical conditions, nor did he have any indwelling catheters or foreign bodies. After an extensive literature review, we report the first case of CSVT caused by P. luteola meningitis in an immunocompetent patient, and we aim to shed light on the diagnosis and treatment approach in this unusual case.

Primary Effusion Lymphoma Secondary to Human Herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8) Infection in an Immunocompetent Host: A Case Report.

Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare, aggressive, mature type of B-cell lymphoma that usually causes malignant, lymphomatous effusions in the absence of a solid mass. This is commonly seen in immunosuppressed individuals such as those with underlying malignancies, human immunodeficiency virus infection (HIV), cirrhosis, and a history of solid organ transplantation who are infected with human herpesvirus 8 (HHV-8). Clinical presentation varies depending on the extent of disease like shortness of breath, abdominal distention, and typical B symptoms like weight loss, fever, and night sweats. Morphological and immunohistochemical analysis of pleural fluid is required for diagnosis of PEL. Recent case studies are increasingly being reported with cases of PEL presenting in immunocompetent individuals infected with HHV-8. We present a case of PEL in an immunocompetent host and highlight its presentation, diagnosis, and management approaches. Due to the well-known association of PEL with immunocompromised status, the diagnosis is often overlooked in immunocompetent individuals. This case would further highlight the increasing association and the need for clinical vigilance in diagnosing PEL in immunocompetent patients.

Cyclophosphamide, Bortezomib, and Dexamethasone and Severe Systolic Heart Failure: A Case Report.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is a neoplastic proliferation of plasma cells in bone marrow. Pharmacotherapy for the management of patients with MM includes drug classes like proteasome inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, immunomodulators, alkylating agents, steroids, etc. We present a case of new-onset heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in a patient with previously normal ejection fraction after treatment with a cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) chemotherapeutic regimen. An echocardiogram done after the completion of nine cycles of chemotherapy in a period of about 4.5 months showed severely decreased left ventricular systolic function with an ejection fraction of only 15-20% and grade I diastolic dysfunction. Cardiac catheterization showed no angiographic evidence of vessel occlusion or epicardial disease. HFrEF was managed with the initiation of guideline-directed medical therapy with cardiology clinic follow-up, and the patient was discharged with a plan to start a lenalidomide-based chemotherapeutic regimen with oncology clinic follow-up. It is, therefore, imperative to perform a thorough cardiovascular assessment before initiation of chemotherapy, complemented by periodic and recurrent assessments of cardiovascular function during and after completion of the treatment course, for early detection and prevention of potentially severe cardiovascular toxicities in patients with MM.

Intravenous Hydration and Associated Outcomes in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease Admitted With Vaso-Occlusive Crises: A Systematic Review.

Acute painful vaso-occlusive crisis (VOC) is the common presentation of sickle cell disease (SCD) leading to emergency room visits, admissions, morbidity, mortality, and negative impacts on quality of life. Among various treatment approaches commonly employed to manage the condition, intravenous (IV) hydration is also frequently used in emergency and inpatient settings. Although helpful to overcome dehydration, IV hydration often leads to adverse outcomes like fluid overload, pulmonary edema, increased length of stay, transfer to intensive care unit, new oxygen requirement, etc. Small-scale retrospective studies are conducted to study the outcomes of IV hydration but have failed to conclusively demonstrate its benefits as well as choice of IV fluids, rate of IV fluid replacement, etc. We conduct this review as an attempt to summarize the available evidence on the role and utility of IV hydration in sickle cell crises along with reported adverse outcomes.