RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Fasudil and ozagrel are drugs with the same indications for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm in Japan. However, there have been no definitive conclusions on the clinical efficacy of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium monotherapy or their combination. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of the combined administration of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium in Japanese patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). METHODS: This cross-sectional study used Diagnosis Procedure Combination data to assess patients who were hospitalized with SAH and received fasudil hydrochloride or ozagrel sodium between April 2016 and March 2020 (n = 17,346). The participants were divided into three groups based on the treatment received: fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy (F group, n = 10,484), ozagrel sodium monotherapy (O group, n = 465), and fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium combination therapy (FO group, n = 6,397). The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Multivariable adjusted logistic regression analysis (significance level, 5%) was used for data analyses. RESULTS: The results of the multivariable analysis, adjusted for factors considered to impact prognosis, showed that the adjusted odds ratio (OR) with the F group as the reference for in-hospital mortality was 0.94 in the FO group (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.81-1.08, p = 0.355), with no differences compared to the F group. CONCLUSION: Fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium had different mechanisms of action, suggesting a synergistic effect of combination therapy. However, a comparison of fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy and combination therapy of fasudil hydrochloride and ozagrel sodium showed no difference in the prognostic effect. Therefore, it was suggested that fasudil hydrochloride monotherapy may be sufficient.
RESUMEN
Background: This study aimed to reveal differences in the effectiveness of rehabilitation in improving activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with acute stroke across age groups and propose age-appropriate rehabilitation strategies. Methods: This observational study analyzed nationwide administrative data of inpatients admitted to hospitals with acute stroke between April 1, 2018, and March 31, 2020. The data included the average length of daily rehabilitation sessions, weekly frequency of rehabilitation sessions, and initiation of rehabilitation within three days. The primary outcome was the improvement in the Barthel Index (BI) score from admission to discharge. We classified the patients based on age and analyzed improvements in ADL according to rehabilitation characteristics. Results: An increased daily rehabilitation dose was associated with improved ADL, except in patients aged <65 years (risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals [CIs] in the 65-74, 75-85, and ≥85 age groups: 1.20 [1.14â1.27], 1.21 [1.15â1.27], and 1.43 [1.34â1.53], respectively; all p <0.001 vs. <65 years: 1.05 [0.98-â1.12]; p=0.18). A rehabilitation frequency of seven sessions per week was associated with improved ADL in the 75-85-year and ≥85-year age groups (1.06 [1.02â1.10] and 1.08 [1.03â1.13], respectively; both p <0.001). The effects of initiating rehabilitation within three days on ADL post-admission did not differ across age groups. Conclusions: Increasing the daily dose of rehabilitation was significantly associated with improved ADL in all age groups while increasing the frequency of rehabilitation per week improved ADL in older and very old patients.
RESUMEN
Backgrounds During the COVID-19 pandemic, visitor restrictions in healthcare settings adversely affected patients. Video calls have emerged as an essential digital alternative that can decrease patients' anxiety and improve satisfaction. This study investigated whether family-initiated video calls could mitigate delirium symptoms and risky behaviors and enhance patients' comprehension of instructions. Methods This observational study used medical chart data and the Diem Payment System from a single acute care hospital in Fukuoka, Japan. The study involved patients hospitalized between May 2020 and August 2021 who used video chat systems. Patients or their relatives used video calls through Skype. The frequency of video chat use served as the primary exposure. Changes in the patients' risky behaviors and instruction comprehension upon discharge were the primary outcomes. Results A total of 532 patients were included in the study, with an average age of over 70 years. After implementing the inverse probability of treatment weighting adjustment, an improved balance across age, sex, BMI categories, and other variables was observed. The effects of video calls on risky behaviors and instruction comprehension varied. Patients with three or more video calls showed distinct effects compared with those with fewer calls. When hospitalization was limited to three weeks, video calls noticeably influenced risky behaviors (p=0.022, 95% CI:1.08-2.63), but not instruction comprehension (p=0.226, 95% CI:0.43-1.22). Conclusions The use of video calls as a visitation method in acute care hospitals during a pandemic suggests that video calls reduce risky behaviors in patients with a three-week stay. This alternative to physical visitations contributes positively to patient safety and supports ongoing efforts to prevent the spread of COVID-19.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To analyse the association between the daily duration of rehabilitation for inpatients with sporadic inclusion body myositis and improvement in activities of daily living, using a Japanese nationwide inpatient administrative claims database. METHODS: Data were extracted regarding inpatients with sporadic inclusion body myositis who had undergone rehabilitation between 1 April 2018 and 31 March 2021. The mean daily duration of rehabilitation was categorized into 2 groups: > 1.0 h (longer rehabilitation) and ≤ 1.0 h (shorter rehabilitation). The main outcome was improvement in activities of daily living from admission to discharge, measured using the Barthel Index. For the main analysis, a generalized linear model was used. RESULTS: In total, 424 patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis met the eligibility criteria for inclusion in the study. The main analysis found a significant difference in improvement in activities of daily living between the longer rehabilitation and shorter rehabilitation groups after adjusting for confounders (risk ratio (95% confidence interval), 1.37 (1.06-1.78)). CONCLUSION: A longer daily duration of rehabilitation results in improved activities of daily living for inpatients with sporadic inclusion body myositis.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Miositis por Cuerpos de Inclusión , Humanos , Estudios de Cohortes , Pacientes Internos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the relationship between the annual volume of patients undergoing rehabilitation per hospital and the outcomes of patients admitted for acute stroke. METHODS: This observational study used nationwide administrative data. Data on stroke patients aged ≥ 20 years who underwent rehabilitation were extracted from 1,182 acute care hospitals in Japan. The exclusion criteria were extended hospital stay exceeding 180 days and death during hospitalization. Hospital volumes were divided into four quartiles of total patients per hospital. The primary outcome was an improvement in activities of daily living from admission to discharge measured using the Barthel index. Poisson regression analysis of activities of daily living improvement was performed using inverse probability of treatment weighting. RESULTS: High rehabilitation volume was significantly correlated with improvements in activities of daily living using the "very low group" as a reference (risk ratio [95% confidence interval]): 1.06 [1.05-1.08], P<0.001). Low volume was also significantly associated with activities of daily living improvement (risk ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.04 [1.03-1.06], P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The annual volume of stroke patients undergoing multidisciplinary rehabilitation at a specific hospital may be a factor in the degree of patient improvement in activities of daily living.
Asunto(s)
Rehabilitación de Accidente Cerebrovascular , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Humanos , Actividades Cotidianas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , HospitalesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of early implementation of and longer daily duration of rehabilitation on patients with acute ischemic stroke who require assistance with activities of daily living (ADL) before hospital admission. DESIGN: Nationwide, cohort, observational study from April 2018 to March 2019. SETTING: Acute care hospitals in Japan. PARTICIPANTS: The Japanese national Diagnosis Procedure Combination database was searched for the period between April 2018 and March 2019. Of the 330,672 patients with ischemic strokes identified, 53,523 met the inclusion criteria of being older than 20 years, having a prehospital modified Rankin Scale score of 3, 4, or 5, and having undergone rehabilitation (N=53,523). INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Improvement in ADL from admission to discharge using the Barthel Index. The effects of the following 3 rehabilitation variables on ADL improvement were evaluated: (1) average daily duration of rehabilitation; (2) rehabilitation started within 3 days after admission (early rehabilitation); and (3) rehabilitation started 1 day after admission (very early rehabilitation). RESULTS: Early rehabilitation was significantly associated with improvements in ADL (odds ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.28; P≤.001). A longer duration of rehabilitation was also significantly associated with ADL improvement (≥2.0 hours: odds ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 2.26-2.75; P≤.001) compared with a ≤1 hour of rehabilitation (1.1-2.0 hours: odds ratio, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.42; P≤.001). CONCLUSIONS: Early implementation of rehabilitation and a longer duration of rehabilitation per day improved the ADL of patients who required assistance before the onset of cerebral infarction.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a supervised rehabilitation programme with longer hours per day on activities of daily living after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer. DESIGN: This study represents retrospective observational use of nationwide administrative data. PATIENTS: Eligible patients (n = 8,633) were first diagnosed with colorectal cancer between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2018, underwent laparoscopicassisted colorectal resection, and began rehabilitation within 3 days of surgery. METHODS: Patients underwent a long (40 min or more) or short (less than 40 min) supervised rehabilitation programme, defined as rehabilitation under physiotherapist and occupational therapist supervision. The main outcome measure was improvement in activities of daily living from postoperative day 0 to day 14 using Nursing Need Degree. RESULTS: Patients who underwent longer daily supervised rehabilitation (n = 7,173) showed greater improvements in activities of daily living at 14 days after laparoscopic surgery than patients who underwent shorter daily supervised rehabilitation (n = 1,460) (odds ratio (95% confidence interval; 95% confidence interval): 1.42 (1.22-1.64), p < 0.001). The rate of postoperative complications did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Longer daily supervised rehabilitation for colorectal cancer improves activities of daily living after laparoscopic surgery.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Colorrectales , Laparoscopía , Actividades Cotidianas , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Humanos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Objectives: This study investigated the impact of the initial outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on rehabilitation and functional outcomes of patients in Japanese hospitals. Methods: The study subjects were hospitals belonging to Japan's National Hospital Organization that provided inpatient care for patients with coronavirus COVID-19 during March-May 2020. We specifically focused on patients who were hospitalized for acute diseases, such as stroke, hip fracture, acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and received rehabilitation during hospitalization. Data were sourced from Japanese administrative data. The primary outcome was rehabilitation provision time in the target hospitals. The secondary outcomes were patient outcomes: rehabilitation participation time, length of hospital stay, 30-day readmission rate, and improvement of activities of daily living. Interrupted time series analysis was performed to evaluate the trend of rehabilitation provision time. Patient outcomes were compared with those for 2019. Results: The rehabilitation provision time for outpatients declined by 62% during the pandemic, while that for inpatients declined temporarily, and then increased. Compared with 2019 outcomes, rehabilitation participation time was longer and hospital stay length was shorter for stroke and hip-fracture patients, the 30-day readmission rate was increased for hip-fracture patients, and improvement of activities in daily living was less for patients with congestive heart failure who were totally dependent at admission. Other outcomes did not change. Conclusions: The findings suggest that during the initial COVID-19 pandemic, resources for rehabilitation were quickly reallocated to inpatient care, and the impact on inpatient outcomes was minimized.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Growing evidence indicates that carefully programmed rehabilitation can improve symptoms in patients with myasthenia gravis (MG). However, evidence on rehabilitation to aid in recovery from a myasthenic crisis is lacking. This study aimed to examine the association between inpatient rehabilitation and recovery in the activities of daily living (ADL) after a myasthenic crisis. METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients hospitalized due to myasthenic crisis in a nationwide administrative database in Japan. Patients were divided into two groups based on the intensity of rehabilitation after weaning from mechanical ventilation. We evaluated the influence of rehabilitation on recovery in the ADL by comparing the two groups in Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard model analyses. RESULTS: We extracted the data of 437 cases treated from April 1, 2016 to March 31, 2020. High-intensity rehabilitation was associated with delayed recovery in the ADL on Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.024, log-rank test). A similar result was obtained after adjusting for covariates in the Cox proportional hazard model analysis (hazard ratio: 0.69; 95% confidence interval: 0.48-0.99; p = 0.043). CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity rehabilitation performed in current inpatient settings may not contribute to recovery in the ADL after a myasthenic crisis in patients with MG. Despite this study's large sample size, further research is necessary to reach firm conclusions.
Asunto(s)
Miastenia Gravis , Timectomía , Actividades Cotidianas , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Japón , Miastenia Gravis/diagnóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
This review introduces the National Hospital Organization (NHO) database in Japan. The NHO has maintained two databases through a system of data collection from 140 hospitals in the NHO. National Hospital Organization Clinical Data Archives (NCDA) is collecting clinical information in real time from the electronic medical records since January 2016, and Medical Information Analysis (MIA) databank is collecting daily insurance claims data since April 2010. The NHO database covers more than 8 million patients in 140 hospitals throughout Japan. The database consists of the information of patient profiles, hospital admission and discharge, diagnosis with ICD-10 codes, text data from medical chart, daily health insurance claims such as medical procedures, medications or surgeries, vital signs and laboratory data, and so on. The NHO database includes a wide variety of diseases and settings, including acute, chronic and intractable diseases, emergency medical services, disaster medicine, response to emerging infectious disease outbreaks, medical care according to health policies such as psychiatry, tuberculosis, or muscular dystrophy, and health systems in sparsely populated non-urban areas. Among several common diseases, the database has representativeness in terms of age distribution compared with the Patient Survey 2017 by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Interested researchers can contact (700-dbproject@mail.hosp.go.jp) the NHO database division to obtain more information about the NHO database for utilization.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Appropriate treatment of stroke immediately after its onset contributes to the improved chances, while delay in hospitalisation affects stroke severity and fatality. This study aimed to determine the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on emergency hospitalisation of patients with stroke in Japan. METHODS: This was an observational study that used nationwide administrative data of hospitalised patients diagnosed with stroke. We cross-sectionally observed patients' background factors during April and May 2020, when the COVID-19 pandemic-related state of emergency was declared; we also observed these factors in the same period in 2019. We also modelled monthly trends in emergency stroke admissions, stroke admissions at each level of the Japan Coma Scale (JCS), fatalities within 24 h, stroke care unit use, intravenous thrombolysis administration, and mechanical thrombectomy implementation using interrupted time series (ITS) regression. RESULTS: There was no difference in patients' pre-hospital baseline characteristics between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods. However, ITS regression revealed a significant change in the number of emergency stroke admissions after the beginning of the pandemic (slope: risk ratio [RR] = 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95-0.99, P = 0.027). There was a significant difference in the JCS score for impaired consciousness in emergency stroke, which was more severe during the pandemic than the pre-pandemic (JCS3 in level: RR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.29-2.33, P < 0.001). There was no change in the total number of fatalities with COVID-19, compared with those without COVID-19, but there were significantly more fatalities within 24 h of admission (fatalities within 24 h: RR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.29-2.33, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The infection prevalence of COVID-19 increased the number of fatalities within 24 h as well as the severity of illness in Japan. However, there was no difference in baseline characteristics, intravenous thrombolysis administration, and mechanical thrombectomy implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic. A decrease in the number of patients and fatalities was observed from the time the state of emergency was declared until August, the period of this study.