Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Transpl Coord ; 7(2): 82-7, 1997 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9295594

RESUMEN

This study identified frequency of sexual dysfunction, degree of satisfaction with sexual relationship, differences in sexual function, overall satisfaction and life quality, and desire for and receipt of instruction regarding sexual dysfunction in kidney, pancreas/kidney, and liver transplant recipients. Of the 768 adult recipients surveyed by mailed questionnaire, 39% responded. Intimate relationships were reported by 69.9%; 66.7% indicated satisfaction with their relationship. Twenty-six percent were not sexually active. Transplant groups did not differ significantly regarding satisfaction, sexual function, or quality of life. Satisfaction groups differed significantly regarding intimacy and expected future life and health quality. Frequency of intercourse, desire, orgasm, erection dysfunctions, and the acceptance of partners' advances related to relationship satisfaction. Sixty-seven percent received no instruction concerning sexuality or fertility. Education efforts could validate and support sexual identity among this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Órganos/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Órganos/psicología , Disfunciones Sexuales Fisiológicas/etiología , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Satisfacción Personal , Calidad de Vida , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Am Surg ; 62(9): 724-32, 1996 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8751763

RESUMEN

Surgical resection has been the standard approach for primary and metastatic liver tumors. Long-term survival, however, is limited because of recurrence or hepatic decompensation. Failure of chemotherapeutic regimens or liver transplantation (OLT) to prevent recurrence has resulted in the need for multimodality therapies. We report our experience with preoperative hepatic arterial chemoembolization (CET) followed by OLT in highly select patients. Over a 33-month period, 23 of 41 patients (56%) referred with primary (n = 16) or metastatic neuroendocrine (n = 7) liver tumors met eligibility requirements. Despite mild, self-limited chemical hepatitis, CET was well tolerated in all but three elderly patients who succumbed to liver failure. Four of five patients ultimately received OLT. Three are alive and free of disease at a mean followup of 17 months, one died of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma, and one (NET) remains well at 33 months with elevated glucagon levels but no measurable disease. All NET patients are alive with resolution of hormonal symptoms. Four of five noncirrhotic patients died of disease, and one has progressive tumor growth. Although OLT following CET achieves superior survival, its application is limited to a minority of patients with such tumors. Careful pretreatment staging and patient selection combined with caution in the use of CET in elderly cirrhotic patients is critical to the success of such therapies.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Trasplante de Hígado , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/patología , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Femenino , Arteria Hepática , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
Intensive Care Med ; 21(4): 302-9, 1995 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7650252

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To determine the incidence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis and severe sepsis in surgical ICU patients and define patient characteristics associated with their acquisition and outcome. DESIGN: One-month prospective study of critically ill patients with a 28 day in-hospital follow up. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit (SICU) at a tertiary care institution. METHODS: All patients (n = 170) admitted to the SICU between April 1 and April 30, 1992 were prospectively followed for 28 days. Daily surveillance was performed by two dedicated, specifically-trained research nurses. Medical and nursing chart reviews were performed, and follow up information at six and twelve months was obtained. RESULTS: The in-hospital surveillance represented 2246 patient-days, including 658 ICU patient-days. Overall, 158 patients (93%) had SIRS for an incidence of 542 episodes/1000 patients-days. The incidence of SIRS in the ICU was even higher (840 episodes/1000 patients-days). A total of 83 patients (49%) had sepsis; among them 28 developed severe sepsis. Importantly, 13 patients had severe sepsis after discharge from the ICU. Patient groups were comparable with respect to age, sex ratio, and type of surgery performed. Apache II score on admission to the ICU and ASA score at time of surgery were significantly higher (p < 0.05) only for patients who subsequently developed severe sepsis. The crude mortality at 28 days was 8.2% (14/170); it markedly differed among patient groups: 6% for those with SIRS vs. 35% for patients with severe sepsis. Patients with sepsis and severe sepsis had a longer mean length of ICU stay (2.1 +/- 0.2 and 7.5 +/- 1.5, respectively) than those with SIRS (1.45 +/- 0.1) or control patients (1.16 +/- 0.1). Total length of hospital stay also markedly differed among groups (35 +/- 9 (severe sepsis), 24 +/- 2 (sepsis), 11 +/- 0.8 (SIRS), and 9 +/- 0.1 (controls, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Almost everyone in the SICU had SIRS. Therefore, because of its poor specificity, SIRS was not helpful predicting severe sepsis and septic shock. Patients who developed sepsis or severe sepsis had higher crude mortality and length of stay than those who did not. Studies designed to identify those who develop complications of SIRS would be very useful.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Sepsis/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Iowa/epidemiología , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Sepsis/clasificación , Choque Séptico/epidemiología , Síndrome de Respuesta Inflamatoria Sistémica/epidemiología , Terminología como Asunto
4.
JAMA ; 271(20): 1598-601, 1994 May 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8182812

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the excess length of stay, extra costs, and mortality attributable to nosocomial bloodstream infection in critically ill patients. DESIGN: Pairwise-matched (1:1) case-control study. SETTING: Surgical intensive care unit (SICU) in a tertiary health care institution. PATIENTS: All patients admitted in the SICU between July 1, 1988, and June 30, 1990, were eligible. Cases were defined as patients with nosocomial bloodstream infection; controls were selected according to matching variables in a stepwise fashion. METHODS: Matching variables were primary diagnosis for admission, age, sex, length of stay before the day of infection in cases, and total number of discharge diagnoses. Matching was successful for 89% of the cohort; 86 matched case-control pairs were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude and attributable mortality, excess length of hospital and SICU stay, and overall costs. RESULTS: Nosocomial bloodstream infection complicated 2.67 per 100 admissions to the SICU during the study period. The crude mortality rates from cases and controls were 50% and 15%, respectively (P < .01); thus, the estimated attributable mortality rate was 35% (95% confidence interval, 25% to 45%). The median length of hospital stay significantly differed between cases and controls (40 vs 26 days, respectively; P < .01). When only matched pairs who survived bloodstream infection were considered (n = 41), cases stayed in the hospital a median of 54 days vs 30 days for controls (P < .01), and cases stayed in the SICU a median of 15 days vs 7 days for controls (P < .01). Thus, extra hospital and SICU length of stay attributable to bloodstream infection was 24 and 8 days, respectively. Extra costs attributable to the infection averaged $40,000 per survivor. CONCLUSIONS: The attributable mortality from nosocomial bloodstream infection is high in critically ill patients. The infection is associated with a doubling of the SICU stay, an excess length of hospital stay of 24 days in survivors, and a significant economic burden.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/economía , Infección Hospitalaria/mortalidad , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Sepsis/economía , Sepsis/mortalidad , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Enfermedad Crítica , Hospitales con más de 500 Camas , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Hospitales Universitarios/economía , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Iowa , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tasa de Supervivencia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA