RESUMEN
AIMS: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is a potential alternative to His bundle pacing. This study aimed to investigate the impact of different septal locations of pacing leads on the diversity of QRS morphology during non-selective LBBAP. METHODS AND RESULTS: Non-selective LBBAP and left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP) were achieved in 50 and 21 patients with atrioventricular block, respectively. The electrophysiological properties of LBBAP and their relationship with the lead location were investigated. QRS morphology and axis showed broad variations during LBBAP. Echocardiography demonstrated a widespread distribution of LBBAP leads in the septum. During non-selective LBBAP, the qR-wave in lead V1 indicated that the primary location for pacing lead was the inferior septum (93%). The non-selective LBBAP lead was deployed deeper than the LVSP lead in the inferior septum. The Qr-wave in lead V1 with the inferior axis in aVF suggested pacing lead placement in the anterior septum. The penetration depth of the non-selective LBBAP lead in the anterior septum was significantly shallower than that in the inferior septum (72 ± 11 and 87 ± 8%, respectively). In lead V6, the deep S-wave indicated the time lag between the R-wave peak and the latest ventricular activation in the coronary sinus trunk, with pacemaker leads deployed closer to the left ventricular apex. CONCLUSION: Different QRS morphologies and axes were linked to the location of the non-selective LBBAP lead in the septum. Various lead deployments are feasible for LBBAP, allowing diversity in the conduction system capture in patients with atrioventricular block.
Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Atrioventricular , Tabique Interventricular , Humanos , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/diagnóstico , Bloqueo Atrioventricular/terapia , Tabique Interventricular/diagnóstico por imagen , Sistema de Conducción Cardíaco , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Trastorno del Sistema de Conducción CardíacoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Multisurface pacemapping may help identify the surface of interest in scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT). This study aimed to investigate the performance of pacemap parameters for detecting critical sites through multisurface mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 26 patients who underwent scar-related VT ablation, pacemap parameters including a matching score, the difference between the longest and shortest stimulus-QRS intervals (Δs-QRS), and the distance between the good pacemap sites were measured. The parameters were compared between surfaces with and without critical sites and ablation outcomes. A total of 941 pacemap at 56 surfaces targeting 35 VTs were analyzed. A greater Δs-QRS (40 vs. 8 ms, p < .001) and longer distance between two good pacemap sites (24 vs. 13 mm, p < .001) were observed on the surfaces with critical sites. A similar trend was seen in multisurface pacemapping for the same VTs (52 vs. 18 ms in Δs-QRS, p = .021; 37 vs. 12 mm in distance, p = .019), although the best pacemap scores were comparable (94 vs. 87, p = .295). The Δs-QRS > 20 ms and the distance >19 mm showed high positive likelihood ratios (19.8 and 6.1, respectively) for discriminating the surface harboring the critical site. Ablation of VTs fulfilling these parameters was successful on the surfaces, but without the required multisurface ablation. CONCLUSION: Temporal (Δs-QRS) and spatial (distance) parameters for good pacemap match sites were excellent markers for detecting the surface harboring critical sites in scar-related VT. A multisurface pacemapping can successfully identify the surface of interest.
Asunto(s)
Ablación por Catéter , Infarto del Miocardio , Taquicardia Ventricular , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Ablación por Catéter/métodos , Cicatriz/diagnóstico , Cicatriz/patología , Cicatriz/cirugía , Electrocardiografía , Humanos , Taquicardia Ventricular/diagnóstico , Taquicardia Ventricular/cirugíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Few predictors of low capture threshold before the deployment of the Micra transcatheter pacing system (Micra TPS) have been determined. We aimed to identify fluoroscopic predictors of an acceptable capture threshold before Micra TPS deployment. METHODS: Sixty patients were successfully implanted with Micra TPS. Before deployment, gooseneck appearance of the catheter shaft was quantified using the angle between the tangent line of the shaft and the cup during diastole in the right anterior oblique (RAO) view. The direction of the device cup toward the ventricular septum was evaluated using the angle between the cup and the horizontal plane in the left anterior oblique (LAO) view. RESULTS: Of the 95 deployments we evaluated, 56 achieved an acceptable capture threshold of ≤2.0 V at 0.24 ms. In this acceptable threshold group, the deflection angle of the gooseneck shaft was significantly larger and the device cup was placed more horizontally with a lower elevation angle compared with those in the high threshold group. A deflection angle of ≥6° and an elevation angle of ≤30° were identified as the predictors of an acceptable capture threshold after deployment. An acceptable capture threshold was achieved in 24/31 (77.4%) patients in whom either angle criterion was satisfied at the first deployment. CONCLUSIONS: Diastolic gooseneck appearance of the delivery catheter in the RAO view or near-horizontal direction in the LAO view predicts an acceptable capture threshold after deployment. The shape of the delivery catheter before deployment should be evaluated using multiple fluoroscopic views to ensure successful implantation of Micra TPS.
Asunto(s)
Marcapaso Artificial , Diseño de Equipo , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Aims: Detection of asymptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation is challenging. Smartphone- or smartwatch-based photoplethysmography is efficient at detecting irregular rhythms using pulse waves but is too complex for older patients. We aimed to evaluate the detection accuracy of atrial fibrillation by a wristwatch-type continuous pulse wave monitor (PWM) in daily life. Methods and results: Patients at high risk of atrial fibrillation but with no history of atrial fibrillation (n = 163; mean CHADS2 score, 1.9) and patients with known atrial fibrillation (n = 123, including 34 with persistent atrial fibrillation) underwent PWM and telemetry electrocardiogram recording for 3 days. Risk of atrial fibrillation was judged using the 'Kyorin Atrial Fibrillation Risk Score', a scoring system based on previously reported atrial fibrillation risk scoring systems. The PWM assessed the presence of atrial fibrillation at 30â min intervals, and the results were compared with the telemetry electrocardiogram findings. The PWMs accurately diagnosed two patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in the high-risk group. The PWMs accurately diagnosed 48 of the 55 patients with atrial fibrillation in the known-atrial fibrillation group. The PWM accuracy in detecting patients with atrial fibrillation was as follows: sensitivity, 98.0%; specificity, 90.6%; positive predictive value, 69.4%; negative predictive value, 99.5%. The respective values for intervals with atrial fibrillation were 86.9%, 98.8%, 89.6%, and 98.5%. Conclusion: The wristwatch-type PWM has shown feasibility in detecting atrial fibrillation in daily life and showed the possibility of being used as a screening tool.
RESUMEN
Esophageal injury is a rare but serious complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. To minimize esophageal injury, our persistent AF (PerAF) protocol involves complete left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) and pulmonary vein (PV) isolation (box isolation), with a centerline away from the esophagus. However, there has been a concern that extensive LA isolation might deteriorate LA function. There has been a paucity of data on LA remodeling after box isolation. Therefore, we compared LA size pre- and post-box isolation with an LAPW centerline in patients with PerAF.Patients who underwent catheter ablation (CA) for PerAF between November 2016 and December 2018 were retrospectively evaluated.The LAPW, including all PVs, was completely isolated in 105 consecutive patients (75 men; mean age: 68 ± 10 years) with PerAF, including 58 patients with long-standing PerAF. During a follow-up of 660 ± 332 days, 76 patients (72%) were arrhythmia-free. The LA dimension (38 ± 6 mm versus 42 ± 7 mm; P < 0.0001) and volume index (38 ± 13 mL/m2 versus 47 ± 14 mL/m2; P < 0.0001) at 6 months post-ablation were significantly decreased in patients who maintained sinus rhythm compared to pre-ablation. In patients with recurrent AF/atrial tachycardia (AT), these parameters were also significantly decreased (P < 0.001, respectively).Box isolation with a posterior centerline has no esophageal complications and a high clinical success rate in patients with PerAF. Reverse remodeling could be achieved even when using extensive isolation of the PV and LAPW in patients with PerAF.
Asunto(s)
Fibrilación Atrial/cirugía , Remodelación Atrial/fisiología , Ablación por Catéter/efectos adversos , Enfermedades del Esófago/etiología , Esófago/lesiones , Atrios Cardíacos/fisiopatología , Anciano , Fibrilación Atrial/diagnóstico , Técnicas de Imagen Cardíaca/instrumentación , Ablación por Catéter/estadística & datos numéricos , Ablación por Catéter/tendencias , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Ecocardiografía/métodos , Electrocardiografía/métodos , Enfermedades del Esófago/prevención & control , Esófago/diagnóstico por imagen , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Atrios Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Venas Pulmonares/cirugía , Recurrencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the differences between distal His bundle pacing (HBP) via the right ventricle and proximal HBP via the right atrium with regard to pacing and sensing parameters. BACKGROUND: HBP preserves physiological ventricular activation. The capture threshold of the adjacent ventricle accompanying HBP has not been evaluated after implantation. METHODS: Fifty patients with bradycardia (58% with atrioventricular block) underwent successful HBP and were followed for 1 year. Precise locations of the lead tips were confirmed using follow-up echocardiography. RESULTS: HBP leads were fixed via the right atrium or right ventricle (25 patients each). Overall, the local ventricle and HBP thresholds were elevated during follow-up. The distal HBP thresholds did not significantly differ from the proximal HBP thresholds, although local ventricular thresholds of distal HBP were markedly lower than those of proximal HBP. At 6 months, the accepted ventricular threshold (≤2.5 V) was maintained in 39 patients (78%). An amplitude of ventricular electrogram post-fixation of ≥2.0 mV and a capture threshold of ≤1.1 V at implantation were determined to be optimal values for predicting the accepted threshold at 6 months, with areas under the curve of 0.86 and 0.84, respectively. Atrial oversensing was often detected in proximal HBP but not distal HBP. CONCLUSIONS: Distal HBP via the right ventricle captured the His bundle, similar to proximal HBP via the right atrium, with a superior local ventricular threshold during follow-up. Anatomy and electrophysiological ventricular properties at implantation may be critical for maintaining adjacent ventricle capture to prevent lead revision (Evaluation of Electrophysiological Parameters related to His Bundle Pacing in Patients With Bradyarrhythmias; UMIN000031364).
Asunto(s)
Fascículo Atrioventricular , Ventrículos Cardíacos , Estimulación Cardíaca Artificial/efectos adversos , Electrocardiografía , Ventrículos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The incidence of pericardial effusion (PE) during radiofrequency catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation is approximately 1%. PE is a major complication during CA, but there has been limited literature about the perforation site responsible. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to retrospectively investigate the characteristics of the procedure and the patients in whom PE developed during CA. METHODS: Of 1363 consecutive patients who underwent catheter ablation from January 2015 to June 2019 in Kyorin University Hospital, we reviewed patients who developed PE during CA. RESULTS: PE during CA occurred in 18 (1.32%) patients (median age, 71 [interquartile range (IQR) 65-77] years, 7 women). The median body mass index was 24 (IQR 20-27). Target arrhythmias for CA of patients with PE include atrial fibrillation (AF) (n = 13, 72%), premature ventricular contraction (n = 2, 11%), ventricular tachycardia (n = 1, 6%), atrial flutter (n = 1, 6%), and orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (n = 1, 6%). Seventeen patients required pericardiocentesis, resulting in 300 (IQR 192.5-475) mL of drainage. Two patients required emergency surgical repair, and 1 died from aortic dissection. Based on the gas analysis, the drained blood was of venous origin in 47% of the total events and 54% of AF ablation. CONCLUSION: PE caused by a diagnostic catheter in the right heart is not uncommon, even in AF ablation.
RESUMEN
Background His-bundle pacing (HBP) is a physiological form of pacing. Although high capture thresholds are common, few predictors of low HBP threshold have been determined. We aimed to identify electrophysiological predictors. Methods Fifty-one patients (53% with atrioventricular block) underwent HBP for bradycardia with an intrinsic QRS duration of <120 ms. Attempts to anchor the HBP lead were guided by unipolar His-bundle electrograms (HB EGMs) recorded with an electrophysiology recording system. Patients were followed-up for >6 months. Results In total, 153 attempts at anchoring the HBP lead were made, of which, 45 achieved acceptable HBP thresholds (≤2.5 V at 1 ms). The amplitude of negative deflection in HB EGM and the selective HBP form at fixation were independently associated with achieving an acceptable threshold. A negative amplitude of ≥0.060 mV in HB EGM was determined as the optimal value for identifying the acceptable threshold. This deep negative HB EGM was recorded with an HBP threshold of 1.4±1.3 V (in 34 attempts), significantly lower than that of positive HB EGM without deep negative deflection (2.8±1.3 V, in 31 trials; or >5 V, in 38 trials). The permanent HBP lead remained with deep negative (≥0.060 mV) or positive HB EGMs in 28 and 14 patients, respectively, and with positive or negative HB injury current in 19 and 23 patients, respectively. During follow-up, increased HBP threshold of >1 V was significantly more prevalent in the positive HB EGM group. The HBP thresholds of deep negative HB EGM and HB injury current, but not of the selective HBP group, were significantly lower than the other subgroups during follow-up. Conclusions Deep negative HB EGM at fixation was associated with an excellent short-term HBP threshold, similar to HB injury current. Analysis of unipolar HB EGM postfixation may enable prediction of permanent HBP threshold.