A large scale temporal and spatial environmental DNA biodiversity survey of marine vertebrates in Brazil following the Fundão tailings dam failure.

Seawater contains a wealth of genetic information, representing the biodiversity of numerous species residing within a particular marine habitat. Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding offers a cost effective, non-destructive method for large scale monitoring of environments, as diverse taxonomic groups are detected using metabarcoding assays. A large-scale eDNA monitoring program of marine vertebrates was conducted across three sampling seasons (Spring 2018, Autumn 2019; Spring 2019) in coastal waters of Brazil. The program was designed to investigate eDNA as a testing method for long term monitoring of marine vertebrates following the Fundão tailings dam failure in November 2015. While no baseline samples were available prior to the dam failure there is still value in profiling the taxa that use the impacted area and the trajectory of recovery. A total of 40 sites were sampled around the mouths of eight river systems, covering approximately 500 km of coastline. Metabarcoding assays targeting the mitochondrial genes 16S rRNA and COI were used to detect fish, marine mammals and elasmobranchs. We detected temporal differences between seasons and spatial differences between rivers/estuaries sampled. Overall, the largest eDNA survey in Brazil to date revealed 69 families from Class Actinopterygii (fish), 15 species from Class Chondrichthyes (sharks and rays), 4 species of marine and estuarine mammals and 23 species of conservation significance including 2 species of endangered dolphin. Our large-scale study reinforces the value eDNA metabarcoding can bring when monitoring the biodiversity of coastal environments and demonstrates the importance of collection of time-stamped environmental samples to better understand the impacts of anthropogenic activities.

Buses, cars, bicycles and walkers: the influence of the type of human transport on the flight responses of waterbirds.

One way to manage disturbance to waterbirds in natural areas where humans require access is to promote the occurrence of stimuli for which birds tolerate closer approaches, and so cause fewer responses. We conducted 730 experimental approaches to 39 species of waterbird, using five stimulus types (single walker, three walkers, bicycle, car and bus) selected to mimic different human management options available for a controlled access, Ramsar-listed wetland. Across species, where differences existed (56% of 25 cases), motor vehicles always evoked shorter flight-initiation distances (FID) than humans on foot. The influence of stimulus type on FID varied across four species for which enough data were available for complete cross-stimulus analysis. All four varied FID in relation to stimuli, differing in 4 to 7 of 10 possible comparisons. Where differences occurred, the effect size was generally modest, suggesting that managing stimulus type (e.g. by requiring people to use vehicles) may have species-specific, modest benefits, at least for the waterbirds we studied. However, different stimulus types have different capacities to reduce the frequency of disturbance (i.e. by carrying more people) and vary in their capacity to travel around important habitat.