Effects of Different Fiber-Reinforced Solutions on Fracture Strength and Pattern in Endodontically Treated Molars.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the fracture strength of endodontically treated molars filled with different composite resins with vs without fiber reinforcement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 intact mandibular molars were selected and endodontically treated. A standardized mesio-occlusal-distal cavity was prepared with cervical margins 1 mm above the cementoenamel junction and oral and buccal walls with 1.5-mm thickness. Universal adhesive was used in all specimens in etch-and-rinse mode. Specimens were divided into four groups (n = 15 each) according to restoration technique: group CSM = adhesive overlay with hybrid ceramic; group EXP = direct restoration with short fiber-reinforced composite; group ESU = direct restoration with nanohybrid composite; and group EST = direct restoration with nanohybrid composite reinforced with horizontal bidirectional glass fibers placed over the pulpal chamber floor. After 7 days of storage in water, samples were loaded until fracture using a universal testing machine. The maximum breaking loads were recorded in Newtons, and statistical analysis was then conducted with two-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test. Fragments were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Mean fracture resistance values were: CSM = 1,428.91 ± 316.90 N; EXP = 1,874.57 ± 299.47 N; ESU = 1,557.44 ± 355.65 N; and EST = 1,870.27 ± 145.11 N. The CSM and EXP groups showed the highest strength values when compared to the other groups. The variable fiber insertion did not significantly alter the fracture resistance. The origin of the fracture was always located on the occlusal surface, mainly in the major contact loading area. CONCLUSION: The use of fiber-reinforced composite showed great improvement in fracture resistance, similar to a cuspal coverage restoration. However, only short fiber-reinforced composites showed a favorable fracture pattern. Int J Prosthodont 2023;36:603-611.

Do Chemical-Based Bonding Techniques Affect the Bond Strength Stability to Cubic Zirconia?

This study evaluated the effectiveness of chemical-based adhesive techniques on promoting immediate and aged bond strength between zirconia and luting cement. A total of 128 discs of zirconia were divided into 4 groups (n = 32) according to the adhesive treatment: tribochemical silica-coating followed by silane (Silane Primer, Kerr) and bonding (Optibond FL, Kerr), Signum Zirconia Bond (Hereaus), Z-Prime Plus (Bisco), and All-Bond Universal (Bisco). Composite cylinders were cemented on the zirconia sample with Duo-Link Universal (Bisco). Eight specimens per group were subjected to 10,000 thermocycles and subsequently bond strength was tested with shear-bond strength test. ANOVA test showed that artificial aging significantly affected the bond strength to zirconia. Bonferroni test highlighted a significant influence of adhesive treatment (Signum) on bond strength after thermocycling. It was concluded that 10-MDP-based bonding systems showed no improvement in initial bond strength compared with tribochemical treatment. All chemical bonding techniques tested in this study were influenced by thermocycling.

Combined Endo-restorative Treatment of a Traumatized Central Incisor: A Five-year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: The management of complicated crown-root fractures is challenging for endodontic restoration. The present case describes a patient who sustained trauma to the maxillary right central incisor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and radiographic examination showed a complicated crown-root fracture and incomplete root development with periapical radiolucency and inadequate endodontic treatment with overfilling. Orthograde retreatment with MTA apical closure combined with a microsurgical approach to remove of extruded material was performed. Coronal sealing was accomplished with a direct adhesive restoration and marginal relocation. RESULTS: A 5-year follow-up showed complete healing of the periapical lesion and correct preservation of function and esthetic parameters. CONCLUSION: A modern minimally invasive treatment protocol allows the maximum conservation of residual dental tissues.

Effects of fiber-glass-reinforced composite restorations on fracture resistance and failure mode of endodontically treated molars.

OBJECTIVES: The study evaluated the fracture resistance and fracture patterns of endodontically treated mandibular first molars restored with glass-fiber-reinforced direct composite restorations. METHODS: In total, 60 extracted intact first molars were treated endodontically; a mesio-occluso-distal (MOD) cavity was prepared and specimens were then divided into six groups: sound teeth (G1), no restoration (G2), direct composite restoration (G3), fiber-post-supported direct composite restoration (G4), direct composite reinforced with horizontal mesio-distal glass-fibers (G5), and buccal-palatal glass-fibers (G6). Specimens were subjected to 5000 thermocycles and 20,000 cycles of 45° oblique loading force at 1.3Hz and 50N; they were then loaded until fracture. The maximum fracture loads were recorded in Newtons (N) and data were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey tests (p<0.05). Fractured specimens were analyzed with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). RESULTS: The mean static loads (in Newtons) were: G1, 831.83; G2, 282.86; G3, 364.18; G4, 502.93; G5, 499.26; and G6, 582.22. Fracture resistance did not differ among G4, G5, and G6, but was significantly higher than G3 (p=0.001). All specimens fractured in a catastrophic way. In G6, glass fibers inducted a partial deflection of the fracture, although they were not able to stop crack propagation. CONCLUSIONS: For the direct restoration of endodontically treated molars, reinforcement of composite resins with glass-fibers or fiber posts can enhance fracture resistance. The SEM analysis showed a low ability of horizontal glass-fibers to deviate the fracture, but this effect was not sufficient to lead to more favorable fracture patterns above the cement-enamel junction (CEJ). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with direct composite restorations seems to be increased by reinforcement with fibers, even if it is insufficient to restore sound molar fracture resistance and cannot avoid vertical fractures.