Clinical significance of the RT-PCR positive sentinel node in melanoma.

BACKGROUND: The clinical relevance of RT-PCR positivity for melanoma markers in the sentinel node remains controversial. Our purpose was to determine whether patients with a histologically negative but RT-PCR positive node were at an increased risk for recurrence than their RT-PCR negative counterparts. METHODS: Thirty-nine adult patients underwent sentinel node biopsies for melanoma between 1998 and 2000. Each sentinel node was bivalved. Half was serially sectioned and examined by routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry (IHC; S100, HMB-45, melanA, and tyrosinase). The other half was analyzed by a nested RT-PCR assay for tyrosinase. RESULTS: Patients were followed for recurrence with a mean follow-up of 71.1 months. The odds ratio of recurrence for RT-PCR positive versus RT-PCR negative patients was 1.39 (0.34, 5.62; p = 0.73). Within the histology negative subgroups, the risk of recurrence in the RT-PCR positive group (26.7%) was not significantly different from the risk of recurrence in the RT-PCR negative group (22.2%) (p = 0.33 chi-squared). RT-PCR of the sentinel node was not a predictor for recurrence on multivariate analysis (p = 0.65). CONCLUSION: Sentinel node RT-PCR positivity did not risk stratify histologically negative melanoma patients beyond routine pathologic examination in this series.

Preoperative chemoradiation and flap reconstruction provide high local control and low wound complication rates for patients undergoing limb salvage surgery for upper extremity tumors.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Neoadjuvant protocols in the management of upper extremity sarcoma have improved local control rates but have been associated with high complication rates. We present a refinement of the Eilber protocol using judicious preoperative chemoradiation, limb salvage surgery, and flap coverage to achieve high local control rates with acceptable wound healing complications. METHODS: Patients presenting with upper extremity neoplasms from 1986 to 2002 were treated with a modified Eilber protocol, consisting of 3 days of adriamycin (30 mg/day) and sequential radiotherapy (300 cGy/day for 10 days). Limb salvage surgery with flap coverage where needed was performed 4-8 weeks later. Patients were followed prospectively for recurrence. RESULTS: Fifty-three consecutive patients with upper extremity tumors were treated and followed for a mean of 6.1 years. This cohort included 44 sarcomas and nine non-metastasizing, locally aggressive tumors. There were two local recurrences (3.8%). Limb salvage was achieved in all patients. Flaps were required in 43.4% of patients. Major complications occurred in 11%, were all flap related (partial flap loss, venous congestion), and went on to heal promptly with treatment. CONCLUSION: This modified Eilber protocol achieved 96% local control for upper extremity tumors with a wound complication rate of 11%. The liberal use of flaps of resulted in healed, stable wounds in all patients.

Autologous diaphragm reconstruction with the pedicled latissimus dorsi flap.

The latissimus dorsi (LD) muscle has been previously described to repair diaphragmatic defects, but as a "reverse" flap, relying on secondary blood supply from the perforating lumbar vessels rather than primary inflow from the dominant thoracodorsal artery. We report resection of a retroperitoneal synovial sarcoma, with reconstruction of the hemidiaphragm using the LD rotated on its primary neurovascular bundle. By using the dominant pedicle, the vascularity of the flap is improved, minimizing the chance of flap tip loss. Maintaining an intact nerve supply prevents atrophy. As the distal origin of the LD is broad and flat, it is ideally suited for diaphragm repair. A latissimus-sparing thoracotomy incision is required to enable this method of diaphragm reconstruction.

Resistance to disruption and gapping of peripheral nerve repairs: an in vitro biomechanical assessment of techniques.

One potential cause of suboptimal results after nerve repair is disruption or gapping of the neurorrhaphy in the postoperative period. This study assesses the biomechanical strength of five nerve repair techniques: fibrin glue, simple epineurial sutures, and three other novel neurorrhaphy methods. Fifty rabbit sciatic nerve segments were divided and repaired utilizing one of five different methods, producing five groups of ten specimens. Fibrin glue and four epineurial suture techniques (simple, horizontal mattress, "Tajima," "Bunnell") were employed. Repaired nerve segments were ramp-loaded to failure on an Instron 8300 materials-testing machine at a displacement rate of 5 mm/min. Gapping at the repair site was captured using high-resolution video. Differences among the five groups were assessed for significance using ANOVA and Fisher's protected least squares differences post-hoc testing. The mean force to produce disruption was higher for mattress suture repairs relative to simple repairs, but not significantly so (p = 0.31). Both were significantly stronger than fibrin glue repairs (p < 0.0001). "Tajima" and "Bunnell" repairs were both statistically stronger than glue (p < 0.0001), simple (p < 0.0001), or mattress (p = 0.0004) repairs, but not significantly different from one another (p = 0.48). Data for gapping at the repair site were similar with all suture techniques outperforming fibrin glue (p = 0.003). "Bunnell" repairs demonstrated the most resistance to gapping, compared to glue (p < 0.0001), simple (p = 0.0001), mattress (p = 0.007) and "Tajima" repairs (p = 0.01). These data demonstrate that repairs done utilizing fibrin glue are significantly weaker than all types of suture repairs. Two novel techniques for nerve repair (epineurial "Tajima" and "Bunnell") are significantly more resistant to disruption and gapping. Further evaluation to assess the effect of these repair techniques on function is required.

Tensile strength of healing peripheral nerves.

Although the time required for a nerve to gain sufficient strength to withstand normal physiologic forces of joint motion is unknown, typically nerve repairs are protected up to 3 weeks postoperatively. The authors investigated the mechanical strength of a nerve repair as a function of time. Fifty adult Sprague-Dawley rats underwent sciatic nerve division and repair, and were sacrificed in groups of 10 at 0, 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks. Repaired nerves were then mechanically loaded at 5 mm/min to failure. Gapping across the repair site was captured on high-resolution video. The contralateral sciatic nerve served as a control. A significant increase in tensile strength was gained between 0 and 1 week and between 2 and 4 weeks. Healing nerves achieved 63 percent of the strength of the control by 8 weeks. Controls showed no gain in strength over the testing period. Gapping occurred at lower forces at all time increments. From 0 to 1 week, a significant increase in load necessary to produce gapping was found, which did not increase significantly again until 8 weeks. These results may have implications for postoperative rehabilitation protocols in patients with nerve injuries.