ALTERED RETINAL PERFUSION IN PATIENTS WITH INACTIVE GRAVES OPHTHALMOPATHY USING OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY ANGIOGRAPHY.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate retinal and optic nerve head (ONH) perfusion in patients with inactive Graves ophthalmopathy (GO) and compare it to healthy controls using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients with inactive GO (study group) and 29 eyes of 29 healthy subjects (control group) were included in this study. The vessel density (VD) data in the superficial and deep retinal OCT angiogram of the macula and the radial peripapillary capillary network (RPC) were extracted and analyzed. OCTA was performed using RTVue XR Avanti with AngioVue (Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA). Clinical activity was evaluated using the clinical activity score, the severity assessment using the NOSPECS classification. Results: The VD in the superficial OCT angiogram and in the OCT angiogram of the ONH was significantly lower in the GO group when compared to the control group (whole en face, P = .016; parafovea, P = .026; RPC peripapillary, P = .027). There was no significant correlation between VD and functional parameters or the NOSPECS classification. Conclusion: Macular VD and ONH capillary density measured using OCTA were significantly lower in the study group compared to healthy controls. Noninvasive quantitative analysis of retinal perfusion using OCTA could be useful in monitoring patients with GO. Abbreviations: CAS = clinical activity score; GO = Graves ophthalmopathy; OCTA = optical coherence tomography angiography; ONH = optic nerve head; RPC = radial peripapillary capillary; rSp = Spearman's correlation coefficient; VD = vessel density.

[Importance of Cryotherapy for Eyelid Papillomas]. / Kryotherapie in der Behandlung ausgedehnter Lidpapillome.

PURPOSE: Cryotherapy as a destructive procedure is an important alternative to the surgical excision of eyelid tumors. METHODS: We report our own experiences in the cryotherapy of large upper eyelid papillomas using spray- and contact-freezing. RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: Cryotherapy gave excellent results in the treatment of unusually large papillomas. The preservation of collagen structures during cryotherapy provides a good aesthetic and functional outcome.

Does general anesthesia have a clinical impact on intraocular pressure in children?

BACKGROUND: Reliable measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) is crucial in pediatric patients with suspected glaucoma. General anesthesia (GA) is usually needed in infants to allow a thorough examination. However, anesthesia itself may influence IOP, depending on the type used and the depth of sedation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the normal distribution of IOP during GA in healthy children and to analyze differences in IOP relative to the anesthetics used and the measurement time point. METHODS: Approval for this observational study was received from the local institutional review boards and written informed consent was obtained from the children's parents. A total of 100 pediatric patients with no history of glaucoma scheduled for nonintraocular surgery underwent general anesthesia, induced with sevoflurane (s) or propofol (p) and maintained with either sevoflurane with remifentanil (S) or propofol with remifentanil (P). The patients were grouped to one of four subgroups (sS, sP, pP, pS) depending on the anesthetics used during induction and maintenance. Hemodynamic parameters and IOP were measured in both eyes at four defined time points: before anesthesia induction (M1); in apnea immediately after induction and before insertion of a laryngeal mask airway (M2); in deep anesthesia during mechanical ventilation (M3); and after extubation (M4), using a handheld Perkins applanation tonometer. Differences in IOP in both eyes during the measurement periods were analyzed using multivariate repeated-measures analysis of variance and Tukey-HSD as a posthoc test with statistical significance set at P < 0.05. Pearson correlation coefficient was used to investigate further relationships between heart rate, systolic blood pressure, and IOP. RESULTS: General anesthesia reduced IOP significantly. The mean IOP was normally distributed, with a mean of 7.4 ± 2.89 mmHg at M1. It decreased significantly to a minimum of 5.6 ± 3.04 mmHg (P < 0.01) at M2 and increased significantly to 7.2 ± 2.51 mmHg (P < 0.01) at M3 and again to 8.4 ± 3.72 mmHg (P = 0.03) at M4. All four subgroups (sS, sP, pP, pS) showed comparable decreases in IOP between M1 and M2. During deep anesthesia (M3) and during reversal (M4), the IOP increased again in all groups. During reversal (M4), however, the sS group had a significantly lower IOP than the pP group (P = 0.001) and sP group (P = 0.02). There were no correlations between changes in IOP and gender, age, or type of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Sevoflurane and propofol, both in combination with remifentanil, significantly lower IOP in children. Individual IOP levels rise and fall during anesthesia, depending on the time point of measurement. The lowest IOP can be measured immediately after induction of anesthesia. This needs to be taken into account when measuring IOP in children.

Accuracy of Measurements With the iCare HOME Rebound Tonometer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the accuracy of intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements obtained with the newly available iCare HOME (RTHOME) rebound tonometer compared with the iCare ONE (RTONE) tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), and possible correlation with central corneal thickness (CCT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: IOP measurements were obtained from 154 patients by an ophthalmologist (doc) using each of the above-mentioned tonometers. In addition, patients (pat) measured their own IOP with the RTHOME and RTONE. The means and SD of results obtained with the different tonometers were compared. Agreement between the tonometers was calculated using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: Mean IOPs for the right eyes only were 15.9±6.4 mm Hg (RTONEdoc), 15.8±6.4 mm Hg (RTONEpat), 15.0±5.9 mm Hg (RTHOMEdoc), 14.9±6.3 mm Hg (RTHOMEpat), and 15.8±4.4 mm Hg (GAT). Bland-Altman analysis revealed mean differences (bias) between RTONEdoc and RTHOMEdoc, between RTHOMEdoc and RTHOMEpat, and between RTHOMEdoc and GAT of 0.8, 0.1, and -0.8 mm Hg, respectively, with 95% limits of agreement of -3.5 to 5.2, -4.9 to 5.1, and -7.2 to 5.6 mm Hg, respectively. Linear regression of the comparisons revealed a proportional error over the range of pressures examined in the case of RTHOMEdoc versus GAT (slope=0.32, P<0.001). Considering the data from all eyes, the difference between RTHOMEdoc and GAT correlated significantly with the CCT (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: RTHOME readings correlate well with the GAT results although some limitations such as dependency of readings on CCT and increasing differences at lower and higher IOP levels need to be taken into account.