The Ethics of Decentralized Clinical Trials and Informed Consent: Taking Technologies' Soft Impacts into Account.

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have the potential to advance the conduct of clinical trials, but raise several ethical issues, including obtaining valid informed consent. The debate on the ethical issues resulting from digitalization is predominantly focused on direct risks relating to for example data protection, safety, and data quality. We submit however, that a broader view on ethical aspects of DCTs is needed to touch upon the new challenges that come with the DCT practice. Digitalization has impacts that go beyond its direct purposes, by shaping behaviors, experiences, social relations, and values. We examine four elements of the informed consent procedure that are affected by DCTs, while taking these soft impacts of technologies into account: (i) informing participants and testing understanding, (ii) freedoms in relation to responsibilities and burdens, (iii) trust in participant-researcher relations, and (iv) impacts on the concept of privacy. Our analysis reveals that a broad view is key for optimal conduct of DCTs. In addition, it provides insight into the ethical impacts of DCTs on informed consent. Technologies such as DCTs potentially have profound impacts which are not immediately addressed by the existing regulatory frameworks, but nonetheless important to recognize. These findings can guide future practices of DCTs to foster the important values of clinical research in this novel approach for conducting clinical trials.

Which Benefits Can Justify Risks in Research?

Research ethics committees (RECs) evaluate whether the risk-benefit ratio of a study is acceptable. Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) are a novel approach for conducting clinical trials that potentially bring important benefits for research, including several collateral benefits. The position of collateral benefits in risk-benefit assessments is currently unclear. DCTs raise therefore questions about how these benefits should be assessed. This paper aims to reconsider the different types of research benefits, and their position in risk-benefit assessments. We first propose a categorization of research benefits, based on the types of benefits that can be distinguished from the literature and ethical guidelines. Secondly, we will reconsider the position of collateral benefits. We argue that these benefits are not fundamentally different from other benefits of research and can therefore be included in risk-benefit assessments of DCTs.

Ethics review of decentralized clinical trials (DCTs): Results of a mock ethics review.

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) can be a valuable addition to the clinical trial landscape. However, the practice of DCTs is dependent on a regulatory system designed for conventional (site-based) trials. This study provides insight into the ethics review of DCTs. A 'mock ethics review' was performed in which members of European ethics committees (ECs) and national competent authorities (NCAs) discussed and reviewed a DCT protocol. Respondents expressed hesitancy toward DCTs and focused on potential risks and burdens. We advise to address these aspects explicitly when submitting a DCT protocol. We propose that both the benefits and risks of DCTs should be carefully monitored to advance the review and practice of this innovative approach to ethically optimize drug development.

Opportunities and Challenges for Decentralized Clinical Trials: European Regulators' Perspective.

Decentralized clinical trials (DCTs) have the potential to improve accessibility, diversity, and retention in clinical trials by moving trial activities to participants' homes and local surroundings. In this study, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 European regulators to identify regulatory challenges and opportunities for the implementation of DCTs in the European Union. The key opportunities for DCTs that were recognized by regulators include a reduced participation burden, which could facilitate the participation of underserved patients. In addition, regulators indicated that data collected in DCTs are expected to be more representative of the real world. Key challenges recognized by regulators for DCTs include concerns regarding investigator oversight and participants' safety when physical examinations and face-to-face contact are limited. To facilitate future learning, hybrid clinical trials with both on-site and decentralized elements are proposed by the respondents.

CSF Biomarkers Reflecting Protein Pathology and Axonal Degeneration Are Associated with Memory, Attentional, and Executive Functioning in Early-Stage Parkinson's Disease.

In early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD), cognitive impairment is common, and a variety of cognitive domains including memory, attention, and executive functioning may be affected. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are potential markers of cognitive functioning. We aimed to explore whether CSF α-synuclein species, neurofilament light chain, amyloid-ß42, and tau are associated with cognitive performance in early-stage PD patients. CSF levels of total-α-synuclein and phosphorylated-α-synuclein, neurofilament light chain, amyloid-ß42, and total-tau and phosphorylated-tau were measured in 26 PD patients (disease duration ≤5 years and Hoehn and Yahr stage 1-2.5). Multivariable linear regression models, adjusted for age, gender, and educational level, were used to assess the relationship between CSF biomarker levels and memory, attention, executive and visuospatial function, and language performance scores. In 26 early-stage PD patients, attention and memory were the most commonly affected domains. A higher CSF phosphorylated-α-synuclein/total-α-synuclein ratio was associated with better executive functioning (sß = 0.40). Higher CSF neurofilament light was associated with worse memory (sß = -0.59), attentional (sß = -0.32), and executive functioning (sß = -0.35). Reduced CSF amyloid-ß42 levels were associated with poorer attentional functioning (sß = 0.35). Higher CSF phosphorylated-tau was associated with worse language functioning (sß = -0.33). Thus, CSF biomarker levels, in particular neurofilament light, were related to the most commonly affected cognitive domains in early-stage PD. This indicates that CSF biomarker levels may identify early-stage PD patients who are at an increased risk of developing cognitive impairment.

[The diagnostic contribution of direct radiographic enlargement and of echography in the study of breast neoplasms]. / Contributo diagnostico dell'ingrandimento radiografico diretto e dell'ecografia nello studio delle neoplasie mammarie.

To compare the diagnostic value and the role of plain radiographic magnification and of ultrasonography (US) in breast cancer evaluation, 83 malignant tumors were studied with mammography, plain radiographic magnification and US. Microcalcifications were not included in our study. All tumors subsequently underwent histology or cytology. In our series, the malignant nature of the lesion was unquestionably proved in 53% of cases while a possible malignancy was suspected in 36% and a benign nature was incorrectly suspected in 11% of cases with mammography. The diagnostic value of plain radiographic magnification was compared with that of US; breast patterns, mammographic and clinical findings were considered. As for breast patterns, plain radiographic magnification was more accurate in evaluating fatty breast than both mammography and US, allowing the correct diagnosis of 58% of questionable mammographic findings, vs. 33% of US. On the contrary, US was more accurate in dense breasts, allowing the correct diagnosis of 77.7% of mammographic misdiagnoses vs. 33.3% only of plain radiographic magnification. As far as mammography is concerned, US was more accurate than plain radiographic magnification in the assessment of round masses (71.4% vs. 38.1%, respectively), whereas plain radiographic magnification was more accurate than US in stellate masses (100% vs. 92.7%, respectively). As far as clinical findings are concerned, plain radiographic magnification sensitivity was substantially the same in the assessment of symptomatic and asymptomatic lesions (91.5% vs. 89%, respectively), whereas US sensitivity was higher in symptomatic (97%) than in asymptomatic (69%) lesions. The rate of false-negative US diagnoses (14.4%) was higher than those of mammography and of plain radiographic magnification. Negative US findings must be considered with caution and are not sufficient to settle a radiologic doubt.