RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Over the past several decades, numerous large cohort studies have attempted to quantify the protective effect of physical activity on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. The aim of the authors' review was to provide an up-to-date overview of the study results. METHODS: In a systematic MEDLINE search conducted in May 2007, the authors included cohort studies that assessed the primary preventive impact of physical activity on all-cause and cardiovascular mortality. The authors reported risk reductions on the basis of comparison between the least active and the most active population subgroups, with the least active population subgroup as the reference group. Random-effect models were used for meta-analysis. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies with 883,372 participants were included. Follow-up ranged from 4 years to over 20 years. The majority of studies reported significant risk reductions for physically active participants. Concerning cardiovascular mortality, physical activity was associated with a risk reduction of 35% (95% confidence interval, 30-40%). All-cause mortality was reduced by 33% (95% confidence interval, 28-37%). Studies that used patient questionnaires to assess physical activity reported lower risk reductions than studies that used more objective measures of fitness. CONCLUSIONS: Physical activity is associated with a marked decrease in cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in both men and women, even after adjusting for other relevant risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/mortalidad , Causas de Muerte , Ejercicio Físico , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Aptitud Física , Conducta de Reducción del RiesgoRESUMEN
The role of clinical practice guidelines (CPG) as a tool for continuous medical education (CME), and quality management in health care is now widely accepted in Germany. Since the 90ies, the physicians' professional associations as well as health care authorities and parliament have been introducing several incentives and regulations in order to promote the use of evidence based CPG. In the past German CPG agencies have been focussing their work on developing and optimising methodological CPG standards. Future CPG activities should address much more other key factors for the success of CPGs, such as medical relevance, practicability, effective dissemination, and implementation. The article describes the process of guideline adaptation by regional physician audit groups as a tool for CPG implementation.