The concentration of the cleaved suPAR forms in pre- and postoperative plasma samples improves the prediction of survival in colorectal cancer: A nationwide multicenter validation and discovery study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim was to evaluate the prognostic biomarker potential of the soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in plasma samples collected pre- and postoperatively from patients resected for colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients with CRC were recruited prospectively at six centers from 2006 to 2008. Preoperative plasma samples were available from 494 patients and from 328 of these patients at 6 months postoperatively. Determinations of intact soluble uPAR (suPAR) suPAR(I-III) and the cleaved forms suPAR(I-III) + (II-III) and uPAR(I) were performed. Clinical data were retrieved retrospectively. RESULTS: In a multivariable model based on preoperative plasma samples suPAR(I-III) + (II-III) and uPAR(I) showed an independent statistically significant association to long term survival. When including the change in biomarker level between the pre- and postoperatively samples the hazard ratios were 3.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.78-5.28; P < .0001) and 2.24 (95% CI, 1.59-3.16; P < .0001) for suPAR(I-III) + (II-III) and uPAR(I), respectively. A one-unit decrease in biomarker levels between the pre- and postoperative levels resulted in a 55% and 34% reduction in the risk estimate of death for suPAR(I-III) + (II-III) and uPAR(I), respectively. CONCLUSION: This study validates previously findings regarding the prognostic significance of suPAR in preoperative samples. The inclusion of postoperative samples added further prognostic information.

Identifying a potential biomarker for primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis and its association with recurrence after transplantation.

BACKGROUND: We investigated circulating levels of individual soluble urokinase plasminogen activation receptor (suPAR) forms to determine if specific circulating fragments of suPAR (II-III) and (I) can better serve as clinical biomarkers for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) and the risk of recurrence after transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum levels of intact suPAR and its cleaved forms were measured with two assays, ELISA and TR-FIA. RESULTS: suPAR levels in healthy controls were significantly lower than those who had glomerular diseases but were not significantly different between FSGS patients and glomerular controls. Intact suPAR (I-II-III) levels were noted to be elevated in glomerular diseases including FSGS. uPAR fragment (I) levels measured with the TR-FIA 4 assay were significantly higher in FSGS (695.4 + 91.29 pMol/L) than glomerular controls (239.1 + 40.45 pMol/L, P = 0.001). However, suPAR(I) levels were not significantly different between recurrent FSGS and nonrecurrent FSGS patients. CONCLUSION: Our analysis of suPAR using the ELISA assay used in all previous studies does not appear to be a useful marker for FSGS nor serve as a predictor for its recurrence after transplantation. The TR-FIA assay results suggest that uPAR(I) is a potential biomarker for FSGS but not of its recurrence.

Urokinase receptor cleavage correlates with tumor volume in a transgenic mouse model of breast cancer.

The urokinase plasminogen activator system plays a key role in tissue degradation during cancer invasion. The linker region between domains I and II of the intact, three domain urokinase receptor uPAR(I-III) is highly susceptible to proteolytic cleavage and the resulting cleaved uPAR forms are strong prognostic biomarkers in several types of cancer, i.e., high levels of the cleaved uPAR forms indicate poor survival. To better understand the role of uPAR cleavage in cancer, we have designed immunoassays for specific quantification of intact mouse uPAR [muPAR(I-III)] and mouse uPAR domain I [muPAR(I)]. The level of muPAR(I) is significantly increased in mammary tumor-bearing mice compared to controls and, notably, there is a strong correlation to tumor volume. In contrast, the tumor volume is only weakly correlated to the level of intact muPAR(I-III), indicating that cleavage of muPAR is a more specific marker for cancer than increased expression of muPAR per se. The levels of the muPAR forms are dramatically affected by in vivo challenge with a urokinase -blocking antibody, demonstrating a functional role of uPA in uPAR cleavage. The levels of the muPAR forms are, however, unaffected by uPA-deficiency, suggesting that redundant proteases maintains the task of cleaving uPAR(I-III) when uPA is absent. Our findings emphasize the significance of the cleaved uPAR forms as cancer biomarkers. The strong correlation between muPAR(I) and the tumor volume in our experimental setup may motivate investigations of human uPAR(I) as biomarker for response to oncological treatment.

First-in-human uPAR PET: Imaging of Cancer Aggressiveness.

A first-in-human clinical trial with Positron Emission Tomography (PET) imaging of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) in patients with breast, prostate and bladder cancer, is described. uPAR is expressed in many types of human cancers and the expression is predictive of invasion, metastasis and indicates poor prognosis. uPAR PET imaging therefore holds promise to be a new and innovative method for improved cancer diagnosis, staging and individual risk stratification. The uPAR specific peptide AE105 was conjugated to the macrocyclic chelator DOTA and labeled with (64)Cu for targeted molecular imaging with PET. The safety, pharmacokinetic, biodistribution profile and radiation dosimetry after a single intravenous dose of (64)Cu-DOTA-AE105 were assessed by serial PET and computed tomography (CT) in 4 prostate, 3 breast and 3 bladder cancer patients. Safety assessment with laboratory blood screening tests was performed before and after PET ligand injection. In a subgroup of the patients, the in vivo stability of our targeted PET ligand was determined in collected blood and urine. No adverse or clinically detectable side effects in any of the 10 patients were found. The ligand exhibited good in vivo stability and fast clearance from plasma and tissue compartments by renal excretion. In addition, high uptake in both primary tumor lesions and lymph node metastases was seen and paralleled high uPAR expression in excised tumor tissue. Overall, this first-in-human study therefore provides promising evidence for safe use of (64)Cu-DOTA-AE105 for uPAR PET imaging in cancer patients.

The soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor and its fragments in venous ulcers.

OBJECTIVE: Activation of proteolytic mechanisms at the cell surface through the activity of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) bound to its receptor, uPAR, is an important process in wound healing. The soluble forms of uPAR (suPAR and its fragments I, II, and III) have nonproteolytic functions that include chemotaxis, adhesion, and proliferation, which also have a role in wound healing. The aim of this study was to determine whether suPAR and its cleaved fragments are present in venous ulcers and whether their levels are associated with healing. METHODS: Ulcer exudates were collected from patients with venous leg ulcers (n = 30). Healing was defined as complete re-epithelialization within 6 months of compression therapy. Time-resolved fluorescence immunoassays were validated for quantification of suPAR and its fragments in ulcer exudates. The effect of exudates on keratinocyte migration was analyzed by an in vitro scratch assay. RESULTS: Ulcer exudates from patients who healed (n = 9) had approximately threefold higher levels of intact suPAR (P = .005), twofold higher levels of suPARI (P = .03), and approximately threefold higher levels suPARII-III (P < .0001) compared with nonhealers (n = 21). Exudate from healing ulcers stimulated keratinocyte migration (P = .02), whereas depletion of suPAR from exudates resulted in cell apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that suPAR and its fragments are present in the environs of venous ulcers and may act as indicators of the propensity of venous ulcers to heal, with suPARII-III being the best discriminator. We speculate that suPAR and its fragments may have a role in the maintenance of an optimal ulcer-healing environment.

Circulating intact and cleaved forms of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor: biological variation, reference intervals and clinical useful cut-points.

BACKGROUND: High levels of circulating forms of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) are significantly associated to poor prognosis in cancer patients. Our aim was to determine biological variations and reference intervals of the uPAR forms in blood, and in addition, to test the clinical relevance of using these as cut-points in colorectal cancer (CRC) prognosis. METHODS: uPAR forms were measured in citrated and EDTA plasma samples using time-resolved fluorescence immunoassays. Diurnal, intra- and inter-individual variations were assessed in plasma samples from cohorts of healthy individuals. Reference intervals were determined in plasma from healthy individuals randomly selected from a Danish multi-center cross-sectional study. A cohort of CRC patients was selected from the same cross-sectional study. RESULTS: The reference intervals showed a slight increase with age and women had ~20% higher levels. The intra- and inter-individual variations were ~10% and ~20-30%, respectively and the measured levels of the uPAR forms were within the determined 95% reference intervals. No diurnal variation was found. Applying the normal upper limit of the reference intervals as cut-point for dichotomizing CRC patients revealed significantly decreased overall survival of patients with levels above this cut-point of any uPAR form. CONCLUSIONS: The reference intervals for the different uPAR forms are valid and the upper normal limits are clinically relevant cut-points for CRC prognosis.

Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR) on tumor-associated macrophages is a marker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Patients were identified from a population-based prospective study of 4990 individuals with symptoms associated with colorectal cancer (CRC). A total of 244 CRC tissue samples were available for immunohistochemical staining of uPAR, semiquantitatively scored at the invasive front, and in the tumor core on cancer cells, macrophages, and myofibroblasts. In addition, the levels of the intact and cleaved uPAR-forms in blood from the same patients are evaluated in this study. In a univariate analysis, the number of uPAR-positive versus uPAR-negative macrophages (HR = 2.26, [95% CI: 1.39-3.66, P = 0.0009]) and cancer cells (HR=1.49, [95% CI: 1.01-2.20, P = 0.047]) located in the tumor core were significantly associated to overall survival. In a multivariate analysis, uPAR-positive versus uPAR-negative macrophages located in the tumor core showed the best separation of patients with positive score associated to poor prognosis (HR = 1.84 [95% CI: 1.12-3.04, P = 0.017]). In a multivariate analysis including clinical covariates and soluble uPAR(I), the latter was significantly associated to overall survival (HR = 2.68 [95% CI: 1.90-3.79, P < 0.0001]) and uPAR-positive macrophages in the tumor core remained significantly associated to overall survival (HR = 1.81 [95% CI: 1.08-3.01, P = 0.023]). Membrane-bound uPAR showed additive effects with the circulating uPAR(I) and stage, giving a hazard ratio of 12 between low and high scores. Thus, combining stage, uPAR(I) in blood and uPAR on macrophages in the tumor core increase the prognostic precision more than tenfold, as compared to stage alone.

uPAR as anti-cancer target: evaluation of biomarker potential, histological localization, and antibody-based therapy.

Degradation of proteins in the extracellular matrix is crucial for the multistep process of cancer invasion and metastasis. Compelling evidence has demonstrated the urokinase receptor (uPAR) and its cognate ligand, the urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), to play critical roles in the concerted action of several proteolytic systems in generation of a high proteolytic potential required for tissue remodeling processes. uPAR is additionally cleaved by uPA on the cell surface, liberating domain I, resulting in abrogated pericellular proteolysis. The expression of both uPAR and uPA is significantly up-regulated during cancer progression and is primarily confined to the tumor-associated stromal compartment. Furthermore, both uPAR and uPA have proven to be prognostic markers in several types of cancer; high levels indicating poor survival. The cleaved forms of uPAR are also prognostic markers, and a potential diagnostic and predictive impact of the different uPAR forms has been reported. Hence, pericellular proteolysis seems to be a suitable target for anti-cancer therapy and numerous approaches have been pursued. Targeting of this process may be achieved by preventing the binding of uPA to uPAR on the cell surface and/or by direct inhibition of the catalytic activity of uPA. Both strategies have been pursued and inhibition of these functions has shown effect in xenogenic cancer models. Pericellular proteolysis has also been inhibited in vivo in mouse models of wound healing and hepatic fibrinolysis using mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) against mouse uPA or uPAR. These reagents will target uPA and uPAR in both stromal cells and cancer cells, and their therapeutic potential can now be assessed in syngenic mouse cancer models.

A new assay for measurement of the liberated domain I of the urokinase receptor in plasma improves the prediction of survival in colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: The liberated domain I of the urokinase plasminogen activator receptor [uPAR(I)] is a significant prognostic marker in lung and ovarian cancer, although the uPAR(I) concentration is below the limit of quantification (LOQ) in a substantial proportion of patient samples (Lung Cancer 2005;48:349-55; Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:5785-93; APMIS 2009;117:755-61). This study was undertaken to design an immunoassay with improved functional sensitivity for measuring uPAR(I) and to evaluate the prognostic value of uPAR(I) for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. METHODS: Surface plasmon resonance analysis identified 2 monoclonal antibodies, R3 and R20, that simultaneously bind to the liberated uPAR(I) but not to intact uPAR. We used R3 for capture and Eu-labeled R20 for detection in designing a 2-site sandwich time-resolved fluorescence immunoassay (TR-FIA 4) for measuring liberated uPAR(I). TR-FIA 4 was validated for use with citrated plasma. The prognostic value of the uPAR(I) concentration was evaluated in 298 CRC patients. The Cox proportional hazards model was used for the uni- and multivariate survival analyses. RESULTS: The LOQ was 0.65 pmol/L. Liberated uPAR(I) was measurable in all patient samples with TR-FIA 4. In the multivariate analysis that included sex, age, tumor stage, tumor localization, and adjuvant treatment, the uPAR(I) concentration measured with TR-FIA 4 (hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.15-2.57; P = 0.009), as well as the concentration of intact soluble uPAR plus the cleaved uPAR fragment containing domains II and III, tumor stage, and age were independent predictors of prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: TR-FIA 4 has a functional sensitivity improved 4-fold over that of the previous uPAR(I) assay. The uPAR(I) concentration measured with TR-FIA 4 is an independent predictor of prognosis in CRC patients.

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor forms in plasma as markers of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability.

OBJECTIVES: : To test if circulating forms of the soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) are potential biomarkers of plaque vulnerability. DESIGN AND METHODS: : Plasma concentrations of suPAR(I-III), suPAR(II-III) and uPAR(I) were measured by time-resolved fluorescence immunoassays in Caucasian patients operated for symptomatic carotid atherosclerosis (n=255). Local suPAR release from plaques into the circulation was assessed in plasma passing retrogradely over the plaque in the carotid artery, collected during surgery (n=7). RESULTS: : The suPAR(I-III) (P=0.03) and suPAR(II-III) (P=0.006) concentrations were higher after ischemic strokes and transient ischemic attacks, i.e., clinical subgroups associated with poorer prognosis and a less stable plaque phenotype, than after amaurosis fugax. Slightly elevated suPAR(I-III) levels were found in plasma from the carotid lesion. However, refuting the hypothesis, the concentrations of the suPAR forms were not higher in patients with short intervals between clinical event and blood sampling compared with those with long intervals. Age, inflammatory markers and diabetes were confounding factors independently associated with suPAR forms. CONCLUSION: : Circulating suPAR forms are probably not useful biomarkers of atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability.